2016 Politics Thread - Enter At Your Own Risk - All Politics & Dumb Opinions Here

[jcardstore]

Originally Posted by xavieronly1

But your previous image was about "marked" topic. It was about Hillary sending marked email using her personal email account.

Now, you are talking about classification without being marked in the first place. Now, you are talking about Hillary not acknowledge the material should be classified and still used her personal account.

2 different things.

I know that I'm eliciting a response from him, I find it amusing.

My point in the last post is that Comey admitted that there were emails that had markings on them so you can't use the excuse that she had no idea

[greentown]

Originally Posted by jcardstore

I wonder if not knowing anything about Hillary's policies makes him the uneducated one

That is another problem with elections these days, the cult of personality. At least with Obama they would say, he will close Guatonamo (sp), or shovel ready jobs. Those may have turned out to be false, but at least they could say something. People like him, can't even do that.

[jarrodsalas]

I think it is safe to say that if this thread has done one thing it has shifted people to the neither side.

[jcardstore]

Originally Posted by cruiserdaddy7

No place to be in the morning, afternoon, and night.

You don't have many places to be when you're 15 lol

[xavieronly1]

Originally Posted by jcardstore

I know that I'm eliciting a response from him, I find it amusing.

My point in the last post is that Comey admitted that there were emails that had markings on them so you can't use the excuse that she had no idea

You read up to July 5th.

Here is what he said on July 7th. The emails were not properly marked.

Rep. Cartwright: Those three documents with the little “c”s on them, were they properly documented? Were they properly marked according to the manual?

Director Comey: No.

Rep. Cartwright: According to the manual, and I ask unanimous consent to enter this into the record, Mr. Chairman. According to the manual, if you’re going to classify something, there has to be a header on the document, right?

Director Comey: Correct.

Rep. Cartwright: Was there a header on the three documents that we’ve discussed today that had the little “c” in the text someplace?

Director Comey: No, there were three e-mails. The “c” was in the body in the text, but there was no header on the email or in the text.

Rep. Cartwright: So if Secretary Clinton really were an expert at what's classified and what’s not classified and we're following the manual, the absence of a header would tell her immediately that those three documents were not classified. Am I correct in that?

Director Comey: That would be a reasonable inference.

[jcardstore]

Originally Posted by xavieronly1

You read up to July 5th.

Here is what he said on July 7th. The emails were not properly marked.

Rep. Cartwright: Those three documents with the little “c”s on them, were they properly documented? Were they properly marked according to the manual?

Director Comey: No.

Rep. Cartwright: According to the manual, and I ask unanimous consent to enter this into the record, Mr. Chairman. According to the manual, if you’re going to classify something, there has to be a header on the document, right?

Director Comey: Correct.

Rep. Cartwright: Was there a header on the three documents that we’ve discussed today that had the little “c” in the text someplace?

Director Comey: No, there were three e-mails. The “c” was in the body in the text, but there was no header on the email or in the text.

Rep. Cartwright: So if Secretary Clinton really were an expert at what's classified and what’s not classified and we're following the manual, the absence of a header would tell her immediately that those three documents were not classified. Am I correct in that?

Director Comey: That would be a reasonable inference.

You can believe what you want, if you're handling classified information you better know all the markings. It's just a convenient excuse. The fact is, they had a classified marking, whether it was the proper marking or not is immaterial, ignorance of the markings is not an excuse. For someone who was working with classified info for her entire career I find it pretty hard to believe she didn't know what the markings meant

[jcardstore]

To be completely fair, when I saw he said the emails were marked I assumed they had the correct top and bottom markings. It was my fault to make that assumption. Taking that information into account still doesn't change my opinion, though

[pgisback]

Originally Posted by jcardstore

back to being serious for a second...

Here's a quote from Comey again



So there WERE emails that bore classification markings, coming from your buddy himself. He followed that up with



Unless your name is Hillary Clinton, of course

Did you listen to a single thing Comey said in the testimony. There were only 3 emails that within the body of the email among a chain there was a (c) marking. He says it is reasonable that Hillary would not know those emails contained classified info because they weren't properly marked. Come on now.

[Ephland]

Obama And Trump Gave Different Responses To The Same Reddit Question

[jcardstore]

Originally Posted by pgisback

Did you listen to a single thing Comey said in the testimony. There were only 3 emails that within the body of the email among a chain there was a (c) marking. He says it is reasonable that Hillary would not know those emails contained classified info because they weren't properly marked. Come on now.

I find it absolutely hilarious how you waited until Xavier posted this to say something even though you were checking this thread the whole time. Just shows how little you know lol

[Clarka3]

Originally Posted by xavieronly1

The point is that the debate is just for the show. You don't get an award for debate champ. There will be no official score. You don't score "point" by putting fact out.

In the end of the day, it does not matter what Trump says. Both parties to spin the whole thing to their sides. You just need to go there and acts like you know stuff. That's all. Trump is a good salesman. He will do fine.

i think it does, because there is a decent-sized contingent of undecided voters to be picked up. If he looks like a fool, it'll kill his chances.

debates matter. you hear (hopefully) what their plans are for the presidency. if the debate doesn't have any of that, it's a show.

[TASS]

I'm watching Trump talk in Colorado Springs and I feel like I'm watching Saturday Night Live, but unfortunately it's not a comedy skit it's really him and he's serious!!

He's trying to explain his impersonation of the handicapped reporter and it's just #@#@#@#@ing mind numbing, I'm really embarrassed for him.

[babyfaceposey]

Originally Posted by pgisback

You mean the email that was sent in May 2011 that was classified in January 2016?

They removed the classification markers so they could send them over a non secure network. When the FBI went through the emails they were remarked for classification. It is illegal to remove classification markers. You can send a secret email over a secret or top secret network. Once the secret email is sent over a top secret network the markings are changed to top secret. You can move up, but not down on a classification marker. Documents are marked for a time period depending on the information. After that time they are reviewed before declassification or they are resubmitted with a new time stamp for continued classification. Anyone who has worked with classified documents knows she broke the law. It is a disgrace to Americans who hold clearances and realize we are held to a different standard. Shame on the FBI for not prosecuting her. Comey is a disgrace to the American people for not doing his job and giving her a pass.

[Timmay]

The fact that she removed secure headings was already established.

In email, Hillary Clinton tells aide to send talking points "nonsecure" - CBS News

[Ephland]

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...ays/ar-BBv08xz

Ok, here's an actual legitimate candidacy issue. Clear cut candidate on both sides of it.

[jcardstore]

So he copies exactly what someone else says, gets called out, then disappears

[jcardstore]

Originally Posted by Ephland

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...ays/ar-BBv08xz

Ok, here's an actual legitimate candidacy issue. Clear cut candidate on both sides of it.

I am absolutely pro choice. I think it's foolish to ban abortions. Just like prohibition of anything else, people are going to do it regardless they'll just doing in unsafe ways

[Timmay]

Originally Posted by babyfaceposey

They removed the classification markers so they could send them over a non secure network. When the FBI went through the emails they were remarked for classification. It is illegal to remove classification markers. You can send a secret email over a secret or top secret network. Once the secret email is sent over a top secret network the markings are changed to top secret. You can move up, but not down on a classification marker. Documents are marked for a time period depending on the information. After that time they are reviewed before declassification or they are resubmitted with a new time stamp for continued classification. Anyone who has worked with classified documents knows she broke the law. It is a disgrace to Americans who hold clearances and realize we are held to a different standard. Shame on the FBI for not prosecuting her. Comey is a disgrace to the American people for not doing his job and giving her a pass.

June 27, 2016: Former President Bill Clinton has an “accidental” meeting with Attorney General Loretta Lynch, causing a political storm.

July 1, 2016: Attorney General Loretta Lynch will accept whatever recommendations the FBI and career prosecutors give in the Clinton investigation.

July 1, 2016: Attorney General Lynch says she regrets meeting with Bill Clinton.

July 2, 2016 Clinton meets with FBI on Saturday of a holiday weekend. Meeting is not recorded and she is not under oath.

July 3, 2016: If Clinton is elected president, she may keep Lynch as attorney general.

July 6, 2016: The Justice Department won’t pursue an indictment against Clinton, ending the FBI’s Clinton investigation.

July 12, 2016: Attorney General Loretta Lynch refuses to answer questions about the FBI’s Clinton investigation in a Congressional hearing.


If you don't see the problem with this you shouldn't be allowed to breed much less vote.

[cruiserdaddy7]

Originally Posted by jcardstore

I am absolutely pro choice. I think it's foolish to ban abortions. Just like prohibition of anything else, people are going to do it regardless they'll just doing in unsafe ways

Good....Atleast that way they won't have a second.

[jdandns]

None of this stuff matters.
Emails are a done deal.
On to the next wing and prayer already.
Here's a freebie for you to get started.
"Slick Hilly".

Good luck...

[jarrodsalas]

Originally Posted by Timmay

June 27, 2016: Former President Bill Clinton has an “accidental” meeting with Attorney General Loretta Lynch, causing a political storm.

July 1, 2016: Attorney General Loretta Lynch will accept whatever recommendations the FBI and career prosecutors give in the Clinton investigation.

July 1, 2016: Attorney General Lynch says she regrets meeting with Bill Clinton.

July 2, 2016 Clinton meets with FBI on Saturday of a holiday weekend. Meeting is not recorded and she is not under oath.

July 3, 2016: If Clinton is elected president, she may keep Lynch as attorney general.

July 6, 2016: The Justice Department won’t pursue an indictment against Clinton, ending the FBI’s Clinton investigation.

July 12, 2016: Attorney General Loretta Lynch refuses to answer questions about the FBI’s Clinton investigation in a Congressional hearing.


If you don't see the problem with this you shouldn't be allowed to breed much less vote.

Take your tin foil hat off bruh.

There was no way she was going to be found of wrongdoing. No way. It would have been a disaster for the Democratic party considering the timing of all of this. She was their only hope for a "qualified" candidate. I told myself that from day one. There were decisions made behind closed doors that helped her avoid this disaster. That should be clear as day to everyone.

[jcardstore]

Originally Posted by cruiserdaddy7

Good....Atleast that way they won't have a second.

I'm personally against abortions but it's not my place to tell someone else what to do with their body and I don't think it should be decided by the government either

[Timmay]

Originally Posted by jarrodsalas

Take your tin foil hat off bruh.

There was no way she was going to be found of wrongdoing. No way. It would have been a disaster for the Democratic party considering the timing of all of this. She was their only hope for a "qualified" candidate. I told myself that from day one. There were decisions made behind closed doors that helped her avoid this disaster. That should be clear as day to everyone.

I know, I've worn it out. I need a new one.

[preakness]

Originally Posted by pgisback

Baylor
TCU
Oklahoma
OK St

Never had Tech in the top 6. I simply said at home they can compete with any team in the nation. Making stuff up like your buddy Trump I see. Lying runs in the family, lol.

But I bumped your post in that thread when you denied saying what you said about texas tech and they're ranking

It was awesome when you denied it, proof was given (bumped old post), you continued to deny, tried to insult a bunch of members, made more bolt ridiculous statements

Kept talking about big ten being overrated when not fern
Sure who was even promoting big ten

Then your rankings weren't that far off from regular polls other than texas tech up and big ten dropped a few

[jewcer2k5]

Originally Posted by jcardstore

I'm personally against abortions but it's not my place to tell someone else what to do with their body and I don't think it should be decided by the government either

Which means you are pro choice.