2016 Politics Thread - Enter At Your Own Risk - All Politics & Dumb Opinions Here

[Clarka3]

Originally Posted by xavieronly1

I don't see how he will get smoked at all.

well, unless he learns that he can't just say things like "we'll not defend allies in NATO", he'll get smoked.

and once it gets to a policy position he isn't solid on (i.e. anything besides immigration and walls), he'll falter. HRC is going to slam the #@#@#@#@ out of him for not having actual advisers for these things, so he needs to get those advisers ahead of time.

if he comes out with eloquent positions, it will put HRC on her heels and then Trump can go on the offensive and dictate the pace and tenor of the debates, which is what he needs to do.

[jcardstore]

Originally Posted by cruiserdaddy7

Polls mean nothing until we see a debate. I think we can both agree on that.

I don't think he will agree with anyone on anything at this point

[pgisback]

Originally Posted by mfisher27

Since it's been confirmed there were emails sent that contained classified information (your "boys" confirmed this), then it would be a reasonable assumption that she doesn't know what is/isn't classified, no? How could the Secretary of State not know what is classified and what isn't? That's just as bad as having her own server.

Not necessarily. The classification process involves different agencies with different opinions. The FBI stated they didn't find any evidence she knowingly sent or received classified info.

[cruiserdaddy7]

Originally Posted by jcardstore

I don't think he will agree with anyone on anything at this point

Very true. I guess we each have our very own fairy tale land we live in.

[ajlaxmn]

Originally Posted by jcardstore

Sure thing. It's much better being able to go back to civil posts. I think the other guy finally went to sheep

Fixed it for you.

[jcardstore]

Originally Posted by pgisback

Not necessarily. The classification process involves different agencies with different opinions. The FBI stated they didn't find any evidence she knowingly sent or received classified info.

That's funny, I never knew you knew so much about internal government classification procedures. I'm sure you just pulled something off google

[pgisback]

Originally Posted by jcardstore

That's funny, I never knew you knew so much about internal government classification procedures. I'm sure you just pulled something off google

Nah, it came from Hillary's spokesperson and one of the heads of the Democrat intelligence committee. Obama also talked about the differences in "classification".

[cruiserdaddy7]

Originally Posted by jcardstore

That's funny, I never knew you knew so much about internal government classification procedures. I'm sure you just pulled something off google

Fallacy fallacy fallacy fallacy fallacy fallacy

[xavieronly1]

Originally Posted by Clarka3

well, unless he learns that he can't just say things like "we'll not defend allies in NATO", he'll get smoked.

and once it gets to a policy position he isn't solid on (i.e. anything besides immigration and walls), he'll falter. HRC is going to slam the #@#@#@#@ out of him for not having actual advisers for these things, so he needs to get those advisers ahead of time.

if he comes out with eloquent positions, it will put HRC on her heels and then Trump can go on the offensive and dictate the pace and tenor of the debates, which is what he needs to do.

The point is that the debate is just for the show. You don't get an award for debate champ. There will be no official score. You don't score "point" by putting fact out.

In the end of the day, it does not matter what Trump says. Both parties to spin the whole thing to their sides. You just need to go there and acts like you know stuff. That's all. Trump is a good salesman. He will do fine.

[jcardstore]

Originally Posted by pgisback

Nah, it came from Hillary's spokesperson and one of the heads of the Democrat intelligence committee. Obama also talked about the differences in "classification".

Classified documents must be marked on the top and the bottom the level of classification so it's pretty much not possible that she didn't know it was classified.

I know you wont read it or don't care but here.

http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/c...20001_vol2.pdf

[pgisback]

Originally Posted by jcardstore

Classified documents must be marked on the top and the bottom the level of classification so it's pretty much not possible that she didn't know it was classified.

I know you wont read it or don't care but here.

http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/c...20001_vol2.pdf

Sure it is. People just typed names or locations in to email chains. Doesn't mean their were classification markings on them. Did you not listen to anything Comey said?

[jcardstore]

Originally Posted by pgisback

Sure it is. People just typed names or locations in to email chains. Doesn't mean their were classification markings on them. Did you not listen to anything Comey said?

Oh? This one seems to be marked.

c. Each interior page of a classified document shall be marked with a banner line at the top
and bottom of the page. Banner markings used on interior pages are also referred to as page
markings

[pgisback]

Originally Posted by jcardstore

Oh? This one seems to be marked.

Please don't vote

[Davesportscards]

Originally Posted by pgisback

Please don't vote

Spoken like a child.

[pgisback]

Originally Posted by Davesportscards

Spoken like a child.

More like a concerned citizen.

[tacoma34]

Originally Posted by pgisback

Please don't vote

Mr. Educated still at it. Did you get any sleep last night?

[jcardstore]

Originally Posted by pgisback

Please don't vote

What are you talking about? I literally watched her send that email. I even pointed out to her that it was classified and she laughed at me.

You can't disprove what I'm saying so it must be true, right?

[pgisback]

Originally Posted by jcardstore

What are you talking about? I literally watched her send that email. I even pointed out to her that it was classified and she laughed at me.

You can't disprove what I'm saying so it must be true, right?

You mean the email that was sent in May 2011 that was classified in January 2016?

[jcardstore]

Originally Posted by pgisback

You mean the email that was sent in May 2011 that was classified in January 2016?

back to being serious for a second...

Here's a quote from Comey again

Only a very small number of the e-mails containing classified information bore markings indicating the presence of classified information.

So there WERE emails that bore classification markings, coming from your buddy himself. He followed that up with

But even if information is not marked “classified” in an e-mail, participants who know or should know that the subject matter is classified are still obligated to protect it.

Unless your name is Hillary Clinton, of course

[greentown]

Originally Posted by pgisback

More like a concerned citizen.

A concerned citizen would be more knowledgeable about her policies and how she plans to achieve them. As many times as you have posted in this thread you have not mentioned a single thing about her policies. But, many times you have referred to Trump supporters as stupid and uneducated and deserving of redicule, and then proceeded to call people Trump supporters and told them not to vote.

So please stop insulting people, and actually try to discuss issues.

[chezball]

Originally Posted by Davesportscards

Spoken like a true child.

Fixed it for you.

[xavieronly1]

Originally Posted by jcardstore

back to being serious for a second...

Here's a quote from Comey again



So there WERE emails that bore classification markings, coming from your buddy himself. He followed that up with



Unless your name is Hillary Clinton, of course

But your previous image was about "marked" topic. It was about Hillary sending marked email using her personal email account.

Now, you are talking about classification without being marked in the first place. Now, you are talking about Hillary not acknowledge the material should be classified and still used her personal account.

2 different things.

[cruiserdaddy7]

Originally Posted by tacoma34

Mr. Educated still at it. Did you get any sleep last night?

No place to be in the morning, afternoon, and night.

[jcardstore]

Originally Posted by greentown

A concerned citizen would be more knowledgeable about her policies and how she plans to achieve them. As many times as you have posted in this thread you have not mentioned a single thing about her policies. But, many times you have referred to Trump supporters as stupid and uneducated and deserving of redicule, and then proceeded to call people Trump supporters and told them not to vote.

So please stop insulting people, and actually try to discuss issues.

I wonder if not knowing anything about Hillary's policies makes him the uneducated one

[tacoma34]

Originally Posted by cruiserdaddy7

No place to be in the morning, afternoon, and night.

Well yeah. When you are that educated, people just come to you for answers, like an oracle.