![]() |
|
GRADING For all grading talk - PSA, BGS, SGC, etc |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 292
|
![]()
If a card has perfect corners, edges, and surfaces, and centering is no worse than 60/40 on the front and 75/25 on the back, do the PSA grading standards say this card must be a 10 or is there still wiggle room for PSA not to award a 10 under their standards? I get that they can do whatever they want -- my question is about what the result SHOULD be under its own published standards in this scenario. I recently sent a 1980 Rickey Henderson PSA 9 in for review that I believe is perfect except for centering on the front, which at its worst is 58/42 (measured using PSA's own high resolution photos), and it came back as a PSA 9 with a little post it note that said "centering" and which pointed to the spot of the card where the centering is 58/42. Frustrating because centering is the one aspect of card grading that is objective and if the centering satisfies PSA's requirements for a 10 then how can that be the basis for not giving it a 10?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 41,173
|
![]()
For a 10, PSA says the centering must not exceed approximately 55/45 to 60/40 on the front. The range is to account for how centering presents in different issues. A bordered card with 60/40 centering L/R and T/B isn’t generally going be get a 10 because it doesn’t have gem mint eye appeal. Whereas a borderless card with the same centering might.
__________________
I love PSA! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 4,268
|
![]()
58/42 sounds like it would look off center, and the decision to grade as 9 seems reasonable and consistent with their scale, for the reasons Khal mentioned.
__________________
BO Resident TAG Grading shill |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 292
|
![]()
Thanks. Here's the card
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 292
|
![]()
Ok, so what you're saying is the eye appeal factor justifies a 9 notwithstanding the fact that 58/42 is better than 60/40? I dont have sour grapes on this, I'm just trying to figure out if this is how it could be a 9 if it technically satisfies the minimum centering requirement listed in the standard
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
|
![]()
Amazing card! I think the rougher cut on the edges paired with the centering ruined it chances. Rare to see the colors so vivid on that card without any print defects.
__________________
Updating my entire collection on Card Ladder. Lots to go... https://www.cardladder.com/showcase/IOBB7AY2qTVVKSgU9Aqj02kfF4I3 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2022
Location: Canada
Posts: 45
|
![]()
yeah, the card have an offcenter LR feeling that make it a 9 I think
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 4,268
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
BO Resident TAG Grading shill |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
|
![]()
9.4!
Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Member
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 292
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: VA
Posts: 8,754
|
![]()
Looks like a BGS 9.5
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 4,071
|
![]()
Definitely just the centering, but I do wonder if there are psa 10 examples with the same centering.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: West coast
Posts: 1,389
|
![]()
The common man will NEVER receive a PSA 10 on this particular card. It’s under population control. I’d be happy with a 9 any day.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Member
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Member
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|