![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Administrator
|
Babe Ruth photo signed to his sister sells for $22,546
September 1, 2010, 10:24 am A Babe Ruth photos originally owned for his sister sold for $22,546 Wednesday through SchulteAuctions.com. The image (above) was the headliner as part of a collection consisting of five original photos and an inner book cover, which was signed, dated and personalized by The Bambino to “Mamie” Margaret Ruth-Moberly. The items were consigned by the family to the Woodstock, Md.-based auction house and were never before been publicly available. Adding to the $22K photo’s appeal was a photo of “Mamie” holding the signed photo. While that photo attracted 39 bids, the next-highest selling image, a photo signed by Lou Gehrig also personalized to Ruth’s sister sold for $11,183 after 37 bids. Among the other items sold were five other Ruth-signed items — $7,902 for a signed photo of The Babe and his wife, down to $1,292 each for a pair of Ruth family photos signed with just a “Babe” signature. Babe Ruth photo signed for his sister sells for $22,546 The Beckett Blog |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Southern New Jersey
Posts: 8,460
|
Kind of odd how he addressed the photo and signed it as Babe instead of George since it was for his sister. Maybe he was goofing around with her, who knows.
__________________
IF YOU CAN'T TAKE AN HONEST REPLY THEN DON'T ASK. ALWAYS BUYING '97 LEGENDS AUTOS OR H.O.F. AUTO NEEDS |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
|
Given the pose in the picture, I'm sure it was meant to portray him as "Babe" as apposed to simply a picture of himself to his sister. After all, how many of us give our sisters an autographed picture of ourselves?
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
|
How many of us are Babe Ruth?
__________________
Check Out My Cards ID = fungi2510 Check me out on Sport Lots. http://www.sportlots.com/inven/invenbin/dealerpage.tpl?dealer=dmkeil02 |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
|
I don't think anyone will be putting a $22,000 Babe Ruth auto into a cut auto card ever. There are plenty of his autos that can be used that cost a lot less.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
mwheeler. It depends on who bought the picture. You just never know. I hope that it stays intact. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
Now, if the inscription was smaller so that more than his name could fit into/onto a card, that would possibly be a different story. But given the size of the inscription, this picture will be staying intact. That's my opinion anyway. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
|
I agree, the card companies are buying the cheapest autographs they can to make into cut autographs. The only exception is if a player's autograph is normally too big to fit on a card, then a manufacturer might pay more for an unusually small autograph that will fit.
But for Ruth autos, they are going to use ones that cost less than $2k most likely. And it seems to me, the quality of cut autos of the most expensive players seem to be going down... most of the Ruths I have seen in the past couple years in Topps and Upper Deck products are either in pencil on a darker background that is harder to see (and thus should sell for less money), or a portion of the auto gets cut off since it was taken from a team signed sheet. |
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|