![]() |
|
|||||||
| BASKETBALL Post your Basketball Cards Hobby Talk |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 299
|
check out this NT Patch
2012 13 National Treasures NBA Material Treasures ED 25 25 JJ Redick | eBay That would suck so bad to pull a patch card and it looked like this. Espcially after seeing what the other patches looked like coming out of this set. IMP they should never put a so called patch card like this on any card, much less in there most expensive product. Well maybe the seller believes in ebay 1 of 1's seeing how its numbered 25/25. I want to talk a lot junk bc more than likely I'll be bidding on bc it should go a pretty reasonable price and it will go with others I already have like it. Trying to get all these patch cards that I can get my hands on. ![]() Just the other day I thought this patch was as plain as it gets. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Banned
|
Dang! Trim sucks, wth is Panini thinking?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
|
Still beats a one color jersey piece, meh...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Banned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
|
How is trim classed as a patch. It's not a patch!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
|
i guess panini thinks if ud could get away with it in exquisite, then national treasures shouldnt be a problem. i agree though, the trim, no matter how many colors or breaks, should not be considered a prime/patch card.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 299
|
I was actually talking about this card, it makes the trim look pretty nice compared to it.
![]() It's number 25/25 it seem like they know this was the last card and instead of cutting up a new patch they trimmed off the smallest piece possibly (to be consider a "Patch Card") and here is what you get. It is ashamed as expensive as this card are a box/pack to them to consider this a patch card. The really bad thing is that all the Patch cards aren't as crappy as these are, here are two I bought that I think are really nice. ![]() ![]() I just think it crappy to make some patches so nice and some so pathetic. Hopefully who ever pulled this pull a logoman or a nice Irving Rookie to even things out. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Edgewater, NJ
Posts: 2,533
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 299
|
Panini is getting bad with the trim cards on Redick cards. I am sure it is the same with others I just notice Redick bc that is who I collected. Here is another thing that blows my mind. This years Certified Patch Cards. I don't get this
Certified Red Patch /49 ![]() Pretty Nice Patch card and numbered to /49 Blue Certified Patch /25 ![]() Grey Trim Patch on the card that there only 1/2 of as many as the Red and its not just this one all the Blue Certified look like this. Here is another low numbered Patch card where they used Trim on all of them. Guess what it is the 10-11 Certified Gold /25 ![]() Panini PLEASE quite using trim and calling them PATCHES!!!!!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
|
Happens. Sucks to pull one I'm sure
__________________
https://www.flickr.com/photos/jinscollection/albums
- collecting HOF patches and inscriptions - |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 929
|
Correct me if I'm wrong but Panini didn't mention anywhere that it is a "patch" but rather deem them as "Prime" Materials. I suppose any relic that is 2-coloured is term "Prime" Material.
__________________
11-14 Panini Private Signings Premier Hobby Singapore |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|