![]() |
|
|||||||
| NON-SPORTS Post Your Non-Sports Cards Hobby Talk |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#326 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 2,972
|
Quote:
![]() From Topps Mint(Meeks), should sell for $4,000? When this: ![]() From 18MM(Meeks) sells for $1,600~? That was his previous high, over the past 3 years, before the Mint card sold. So, does something being harder to hit really negate the fact that most of these guys have hundreds of sketches floating around out there? One instance I will yield you is if a GOOD artist is NEW in a set. In that instance, I get prices being higher than usual. What we're seeing isn't that though. I don't see an uptick in quality. I do understand they're harder to hit but again, why does that matter...to the tune of $2,400 MORE, for a sketch that's not 1/10th as well done? Maybe you can answer those questions. I can not. 2. Less doesn't always equal better. I'm all for MORE quality cuts, which UD does make, so people can actually collect them. It sounds like you might prefer: ![]() That "1/1" Doom for $6,000 over: ![]() That /65 for $150, the absolute HIGHEST a Doom cut has sold for from UD. 3. The quality of the card is better? You might be right on this one, as I have had 0 Topps Chrome cards in my hands. Are you comparing apples to apples though? Like Topps Chrome quality to say Marvel Platinum? Cause if TC is better quality that Platinum, which has a CRAZY high Gem 10 rate via PSA...then cool, the quality is better
__________________
I ONLY ship to the US and also ONLY buy & sell(No trading). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#327 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 9,599
|
Hey that sketch looks familiar
![]() +1 to the rarity of a sketch or even stock shouldn’t see these large price discrepancies. A sketch to me is about the art quality foremost. In an ideal world that would be the total driver of its value, but it’s not the case. I will grant set stock has historically factored into market value, no question. People probably pay more for Marvel Masterpieces stock, especially 07-08MM era, over say Annual stock for a similar quality sketch. And definitely over PSC’s on non-set stock. But the discrepancies are large for the Topps era and don’t make sense to me. I do not see any big uptick in art quality. It does make sense from the perspective of flippers/gamblers though, basing prices solely on level of difficulty to hit in a pack, and not much else. To some not really in tune with sketches or valuation…it’s probably as simple as “Hey it’s Dr Doom! Hey it’s 1:500 packs!”…thus it must be a high value sketch, regardless of what the heck it even looks like. The current prices are pretty silly. Edit: I forgot to add one more hey above…. “Hey…it’s encased!”, as if it’ll add $2k value to a sketch
__________________
~~~ '90s trading cards === Golden Era ~~~ Last edited by DynaEtch; 08-06-2025 at 05:55 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#328 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 2,972
|
Nice display Dyna
![]() The whole thing doesn't make sense. I can't fathom a COLLECTOR getting the choice of the Thanos & $2,400 cash or...the lackluster Iron Man. Also, how would anyone who "looks up sketch cards all the time" even make the statement that the quality is better... I'd agree that the Topps LOW quality sketch cards ARE seemingly better than UD's low quality sketches, but I think that might boil down to Topps refusing several so they can make them "rare". Almost none of this crap we collect is "rare". It really never was and it probably never will be. They can serial number stuff into oblivion and make the same image "rare", but beyond that...millions and millions of numbered/sketches/comic cuts etc. are floating around at this point. Then you add in Topps/Fanatics and the antics/hoops you have to go through to even get a single box...No thank you. Not for the price they're asking, not even for 50% of the price they're asking...let alone the secondary prices. Back collecting UD is where my money will go. Not sure how many "me's" Topps can loss before it's just dudes flipping boxes and singles to each other and collecting absolutely nothing...save perhaps 10-20 guys with a TON of money and nothing better to do with it.
__________________
I ONLY ship to the US and also ONLY buy & sell(No trading). |
|
|
|
|
|
#329 | |
|
Member
|
I don't have all the answers, but let's be honest and clear about one thing--that Doom sketch came from a 'limited' Mint product that was only available at SDCC. That carries its own tax of sorts. Trust me, I collect LEGO and those SDCC-exclusive LEGO sets are silly on the secondary market.
Of course, Mint will be a wider release, so my guess is whomever dropped that kind of dough on the Doom did not know that. The backs of the SDCC Mint cards do not indicate SDCC in any way on the cardstock, so I'd guess they are the same as will be in the normal release, whenever that is. Quote:
__________________
Go green--reuse toploaders! Tons of cards available: https://rhinosgonecrazy.com/html/index_avail.html Last edited by glorbgorb; 08-06-2025 at 07:28 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#330 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 2,972
|
Quote:
. Your arguments have been poor. Not back up by anything but "I've collected since 2008", from what I can tell. You say you're taking the time to look up sketches every day...and then you're saying the quality is "higher" in Topps...Here are some examples...Just took the last 5 Topps sketches, since there aren't a ton: $900 ![]() $500 ![]() $400 ![]() $350 ![]() $260 ![]() From UD I just did the last 7 days and picked a few out: $375 ![]() $160 ![]() $160 ![]() $141 ![]() $100 ![]() You're a collector...what are you spending your hard earned money on? You could have the Beast or basically all 5 UD sketches(You'd owe $36 dollars). I'd hazard a guess that if people didn't KNOW the prices, because I just typed them out, that the Ghost would be the top choice of MOST people...save a Beast collector perhaps? So, again, make sense of it. You're the expert. Explain without saying "they made less"...when again, 90%+ of these guys have hundreds, if not thousands of sketches out there.
__________________
I ONLY ship to the US and also ONLY buy & sell(No trading). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#331 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 2,972
|
And another one for the road...because I like driving home a point when I start in on something. Here are your choices:
Option A for $4,000: ![]() Or Option B for $4,000: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Obviously no disrespect to Meeks, guy is one of the best, but c'mon. Make it make sense.
__________________
I ONLY ship to the US and also ONLY buy & sell(No trading). |
|
|
|
|
|
#332 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 9,599
|
I will offer some middling ground here…I agree with points both of you are making. To orion’s point, I think those topps sketches above are priced way high. To each their own…but I’d not be paying that. That is showing what’s going on with the sketches in the era pretty well.
And I think glorb you’re hitting on the cause exactly- it’s more the “It’s new and it’s Topps”, “it’s SDCC set”, it’s a longer odds hit, and it’s encased. I guess the point I’m getting as is sketches don’t really click with me like that. Im looking at the art and artist..maybe the character, when evaluating sketch value. It just doesn’t matter to me whether it was a longer odds hit, or came from a Topps set etc….but….im not the market. As to avg sketch quality being up or down…I guess it’s a matter of opinion, no objective answer here. We haven’t had a huge sampling yet from topps but just my personal opinion, I don’t think it’s any up from UD. Granted even UD towards the end was experience a decrease in avg sketch quality. This is all subjective…but I think roughly 2014-2020 seemed like a good time for sketches with UD marvel. Actually 07-2012 (with beginnings) wasnt bad either but many of the 07-08s were black and white, some like them, some don’t. Anyway…I see points both of you are making. For me, and it sounds like for Orion too…the prices some of these topps sketches are going for don’t make a lot of sense. The rest of that Thanos display btw (in fairness most of these are APs. But they were all UD, within MM16-MM20 sets). ![]()
__________________
~~~ '90s trading cards === Golden Era ~~~ |
|
|
|
|
|
#333 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 9,599
|
Quote:
Heck I’m picking option B…putting a Jusko in it kinda seals that deal pretty darn fast! Not even really close with all those sketches. And this is coming from someone who is a big fan of Meeks’ art (obviously, having bought that Thanos).
__________________
~~~ '90s trading cards === Golden Era ~~~ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#334 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 2,972
|
Quote:
A ![]() Or B ![]() ![]() I don't think anyone who COLLECTS is taking A, not in a million years...again, save a huge character collector. Those are just random UD sketches from the past 7 days. Of course there are garbage UD sketches that are far worse...but they're also priced accordingly. No offense to the artist on the Topps sketch but I wouldn't give someone $20 at a show for it if the stipulation was that I had to keep it. And his argument is that Topps sketches are higher quality. I don't buy it. And so far his evidence/arguments have been that he has collected since 2008 and looks up sketches every day... ![]() PS. Sweet sketches Dyna, yet again
__________________
I ONLY ship to the US and also ONLY buy & sell(No trading). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#335 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 2,972
|
Quote:
Haha. I'll leave it at that, but I'd love some responses from the sketch lord...
__________________
I ONLY ship to the US and also ONLY buy & sell(No trading). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#336 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 2,972
|
I think I'll go ahead and answer my own question...
My opinion is that we're dealing with mostly uneducated buyers. Probably sports guys. Not ALL of these are getting purchased by them, but I suspect some of these are. I can't imagine collectors seeing these options and prices and being the buyers in a lot of cases. I have nothing against sports guys coming into the hobby. The more the merrier. I started off doing sports cards and still do them to this day, 41~ years later. I just don't see them continually dumping this kind of money into stuff that just isn't worth nearly what they're spending. I dislike what Topps has done with the Marvel license thus far so much that I guess I've become quasi rude in making a point. Sorry about that glorb. I have nothing against you personally, I don't even know you. Anyone defending or trying to justify prices on these singles, wax and/or their business model just irks me. I'll keep my old man, hate the new stuff attitude out of Topps threads as much as possible...I just feel like I have to say something sometimes. I really do enjoy this hobby and IMO, they are "ruining it".
__________________
I ONLY ship to the US and also ONLY buy & sell(No trading). |
|
|
|
|
|
#337 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 11,385
|
Quote:
EDIT - Just to add, I jumped over to whatnot just to see, and there are currently 2 breakers ripping 25 Marvel Chrome. And its 9:30 AM on a Thursday morning. Last edited by premium1981; 08-07-2025 at 08:35 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#338 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 2,972
|
Quote:
I understand that the wax is being bought by breakers and the risk is fractionalized. My issue with Topps is the initial offering of wax to the "public" is like 1%(or less) of the total wax available. The rest seemingly ends up with these breakers and the pump starts and never stops. So, anyone who does enjoy opening is forced to either pay the ridiculous secondary price or join in the pump, where they have almost no shot at hitting anything because the astronomical odds of hitting something are even worse because you've got 1 slot out of 200.
__________________
I ONLY ship to the US and also ONLY buy & sell(No trading). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#340 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 11,385
|
My fault, I just assumed you were talking about the box prices the way it was worded. In my view, the single prices on pretty everything is horrible. Almost everything trends down with singles while wax trends up. A lot of the stuff going for hundreds or even thousands right now will be worth $10-$50 in a few years. So in that instance, yes, I agree with you completely that anyone buying (who cares at all about value) is definitely uneducated. But, just like with the stock market, that is how peaks are created. Someone is buying at stupid prices and will be left looking back at how bad their purchase was. Or multiple people as it stair steps back down to reality.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#341 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
![]() Curious to see what the hike, combined with the huge jump in USPS retail postage rates, does to sales. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#342 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 11,385
|
If it helps answer anyone's questions about why so few were made available, Backyard is currently streaming on Whatnot breaking live boxes of 25 Marvel Sapphire. Knock me over with a feather.
EDIT - I'll add to this instead of making another post. The BYB stream is for 5 boxes of sapphire, filled and running now. I tallied their sold prices and these 5 boxes sold for a grand total of $13,811. Even for their standards, that is a mighty large profit margin. Per box price of $2,762 before fees. Last edited by premium1981; 08-07-2025 at 03:21 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#343 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
People complained about print lines on Topps Chrome but Im guessing(not a manufacturer) that it would be extremely expensive and or time consuming to attempt to produce a set so large with ZERO print lines throughout the product. Aside from that the case I opened had next to no quality issues. I've been direct with UD as a hobby store for awhile now, Topps not going on a few years so I sell/rip a lot of Topps and UD stuff. I probably request replacements from UD 5x more than I do from Topps on damaged hits. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#344 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Chicago
Posts: 5,547
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#345 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 11,385
|
Two "hot chicks" doing the breaks is part of it. They are catering to their audience, and it is working well. They most likely got those boxes around release price direct from Topps, so let's say $2,500 in cost turned into $13,800 in about an hour. That is the exact reason why any and all wax that has any demand at all goes up, and only up. I can't stand to watch it, but I click through random places looking for data. Before I finished adding this break up they had another one posted to run again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#346 | ||
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 2,972
|
Quote:
Quote:
I mentioned earlier that I'd have to take the posters word that the quality of the card was better, as I haven't had any TC in hand. But...I have had 5 genesis cards(Ghost Spider...I like the image...sue me!) in hand. All cards were definitely in good condition, but I wouldn't say they were in any better(or worse) condition than thicker UD cards. You're a shop owner, so you should know. I seriously have no idea. In my previous post about condition, I wanted to know if they were comparing apples to apples...Topps Chrome Marvel to Marvel Platinum. Much easier to keep those cards in great shape vs thick cards with all sorts of edge issues. I will say, via opening a metric TON of Marvel Black Diamond...the thin stock cards were mostly in 8+ condition and the thick cards were all over the place. 4's and 5's mixed in with probably 8's max. I think UD has ALWAYS had issues with thicker cards. Older Exquisite etc. were the same. I remember opening several boxes over the years and they were kind of the same as the BD. 4's-8's, mostly.
__________________
I ONLY ship to the US and also ONLY buy & sell(No trading). |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#347 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 11,417
|
I’m not sure why “thick cards = premium” ever became a thing to be honest. They are harder to store and as said above, tend to suffer in QC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#348 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 10,131
|
Nar and Jusko. No question.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#349 |
|
Member
|
I feel your frustration with Topps Orion, I actually closed my Topps account once I realized that there is no chance for me to ever buy any wax from Star Wars or Marvel anymore.Just get a frozen website and then sold out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#350 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|