2025 NFL Offseason Thread

[BostonNut]

Originally Posted by Bosoxfan5990

The Patriots know what it feels like to have rules changed on them because of another team being whiny crybabies.

Truth.

[Boo]

One of the main complaints by defenses is that they use a hard count sometimes so that is what makes it unfair. They want it so that you have to go on the first count, that would even up the odds. I'm almost ok with that but at this point, let the Eagles keep doing it and making everyone else mad.

[hxcmilkshake]

I think the Eagles should do it more. 3rd and 3? Tush push twice if needed. Anywhere on the field.

Then other teams will copy.

And we will have 10+ tush pushes each game

Then it'll get banned because no one wants to watch rugby/football.

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

[oldgoldy97]

Originally Posted by hxcmilkshake

I think the Eagles should do it more. 3rd and 3? Tush push twice if needed. Anywhere on the field.

Then other teams will copy.

And we will have 10+ tush pushes each game

Then it'll get banned because no one wants to watch rugby/football.

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

I like your thinking.

[Floridacardguy]

I am just worried other teams will start doing it and then I am watching a rugby game. I don't want to watch rugby

[Grid]

Originally Posted by packman80

Yeah Eagles fans not that bright. They keep trying to troll the Packers and their fans despite this was 100% brought up by the league itself. They wanted this banned and used the Packers because Mark Murphy is retiring in July as team president. They figured he could take the blame for bringing this up and that no other owner would have to take the blame.

Though first time a injury happens to a starting QB you know they will be running to ban this in a 32-0 vote.

Until then keep it but be fair call offsides on the play when the OL always seems to be offsides when lining up to run the tush push. If you want to ban it have the refs start calling it as it should be.

Not buying it. Packers wanted it banned, cause Jordan Love couldn't do it as well. He just pushes his own tush...

[packman80]

Originally Posted by Grid

Not buying it. Packers wanted it banned, cause Jordan Love couldn't do it as well. He just pushes his own tush...

Packers HC and GM have said they could care less about Tush Push. NFL pushed Murphy into it he's retiring so why should he care if it makes him look bad.

[asujbl]

Originally Posted by packman80

Packers HC and GM have said they could care less about Tush Push. NFL pushed Murphy into it he's retiring so why should he care if it makes him look bad.

So he could care?

[blackvodka]

Only two teams use the "tush push" with any real success. Personally, I would have been really surprised if it was actually banned.

Sent from my motorola razr 2024 using Tapatalk

[asujbl]

I sort of respect how much Stefon Diggs does not give a #@#@#@#@ about his career anymore

[packman80]

Originally Posted by asujbl

I sort of respect how much Stefon Diggs does not give a #@#@#@#@ about his career anymore

Soon as that video came out if I was the NFL I am sending Diggs a text saying you have been selected for a random drug test please show up today at such and such to take the test.

[blackvodka]

Only a wide receiver.

At least he showed up for OTAs.

Sent from my motorola razr 2024 using Tapatalk

[2010GBPackers]

To be clear on the "Tush Push" vote, the Packers were used as a vessel by the NFL, which wanted to see it banned. The Packers don't give a sh!t whether it is banned or not, but Goodell convinced Mark Murphy to submit the resolution. This is for two reasons:

1. The Packers have no owner. There will be no blowback to any one individual since the Packers are essentially run by a management team, and the head of team, the President....see #2

2. Mark Murphy is retiring due to the Packers' mandatory age 70 requirement to do so. So if folks around the league get super pissed at Murphy for bringing this up for a vote, he's gone in 2 months. Now there's no one to be mad at.

Guys, the NFL wanted this gone. They got close, and I'm betting next time they'll have the votes.

[oldgoldy97]

Originally Posted by asujbl

So he could care?

Don’t talk grammar with a Packer fan.

[jmarascojr]

Originally Posted by asujbl

I sort of respect how much Stefon Diggs does not give a #@#@#@#@ about his career anymore

OTAs for a team who's best case scenario is a 7 seed in the playoffs

OR

Party on a boat with Cardi B and a bunch of video sloots...

[asujbl]

Originally Posted by jmarascojr

OTAs for a team who's best case scenario is a 7 seed in the playoffs

OR

Party on a boat with Cardi B and a bunch of video sloots...

I feel like you don't know the story...

OTA's have nothing to do with it

[majestik101]

Clearly it was a bag of pink pop rocks that Diggs gave to the blonde skank after she called him daddy.

I don't see what the problem is

[Jaysabz]

Not trying to be salacious... I'd like to say thank you to Kenny Pickett for your time in Philly, you were a class guy, stepped in when we needed you, and played well through a lot of pain on your way to helping the Eagles secure their second Super Bowl win. Plus you got to take snaps in a Super Bowl!

But on the Eagles subreddit, it seems Pickett took some shots at Steelers Nation today:

During the Browns‘ OTAs, Pickett expressed his gratitude for the Eagles‘ organization but took a subtle jab at the Steelers, the team that picked him during the 2022 NFL draft.

“I’m extremely grateful for my time in Philly,” Pickett said on Wednesday.

“I think I was just shown how it’s supposed to be done, really, from the top down. So when you get a chance to see what it’s supposed to look like and how it should look on a day-to-day basis, not just on Sundays. You know, I think it’ll pay dividends for me in the future.”

[asujbl]

Originally Posted by Jaysabz

Not trying to be salacious... I'd like to say thank you to Kenny Pickett for your time in Philly, you were a class guy, stepped in when we needed you, and played well through a lot of pain on your way to helping the Eagles secure their second Super Bowl win. Plus you got to take snaps in a Super Bowl!

But on the Eagles subreddit, it seems Pickett took some shots at Steelers Nation today:

During the Browns‘ OTAs, Pickett expressed his gratitude for the Eagles‘ organization but took a subtle jab at the Steelers, the team that picked him during the 2022 NFL draft.

“I’m extremely grateful for my time in Philly,” Pickett said on Wednesday.

“I think I was just shown how it’s supposed to be done, really, from the top down. So when you get a chance to see what it’s supposed to look like and how it should look on a day-to-day basis, not just on Sundays. You know, I think it’ll pay dividends for me in the future.”

Echoing what Terry Bradshaw said

[21Pittsburgh58]

Steelers are not in a good place right now in so many ways.

Very frustrating

[Grid]

Originally Posted by packman80

Packers HC and GM have said they could care less about Tush Push. NFL pushed Murphy into it he's retiring so why should he care if it makes him look bad.

Originally Posted by 2010GBPackers

To be clear on the "Tush Push" vote, the Packers were used as a vessel by the NFL, which wanted to see it banned. The Packers don't give a sh!t whether it is banned or not, but Goodell convinced Mark Murphy to submit the resolution. This is for two reasons:

1. The Packers have no owner. There will be no blowback to any one individual since the Packers are essentially run by a management team, and the head of team, the President....see #2

2. Mark Murphy is retiring due to the Packers' mandatory age 70 requirement to do so. So if folks around the league get super pissed at Murphy for bringing this up for a vote, he's gone in 2 months. Now there's no one to be mad at.

Guys, the NFL wanted this gone. They got close, and I'm betting next time they'll have the votes.

The Packer backers are all worked up over this I see. Everyone knows it makes their organization look soft for wanting it banned.

Packer Fans, yes we put it up for vote. But we didn't want to, they made us. But we still did it cause we are soft.

[hairysasquatch]

Originally Posted by Grid

The Packer backers are all worked up over this I see. Everyone knows it makes their organization look soft for wanting it banned.

Packer Fans, yes we put it up for vote. But we didn't want to, they made us. But we still did it cause we are soft.

Grid's capacity for deflection knows no bounds. Yes, the Packers brought it up for a vote, but they were joined in their "softness" by the Vikes and, to no one's surprise - Da Bearss!

https://www.cbsnews.com/philadelphia...n-vote-eagles/

Keep on keepin' on, Griddy!

[Jaysabz]

Originally Posted by hairysasquatch

Grid's capacity for deflection knows no bounds. Yes, the Packers brought it up for a vote, but they were joined in their "softness" by the Vikes and, to no one's surprise - Da Bearss!

https://www.cbsnews.com/philadelphia...n-vote-eagles/

Keep on keepin' on, Griddy!

Pretty badass that the Lions voted no on the ban, being a favorite in the NFC and playing the Eagles head-to-head this year.

My cousin married into a Lions household and lives in Detroit now. Her husband, a lifelong Lions fan, wants to come to the Lions / Eagles game in Philadelphia this year.

I told him probably best he didn't wear a Lions jersey to the game, but he said he's worn Lions gear at all the NFC North Division opponents' stadiums and never had any problems but for verbal sparring. But the Lions / Eagles is a 8:20pm start. The later the start, the rowdier the crowd, generally. I still have time to talk him out of it...

[Grid]

Originally Posted by hairysasquatch

Grid's capacity for deflection knows no bounds. Yes, the Packers brought it up for a vote, but they were joined in their "softness" by the Vikes and, to no one's surprise - Da Bearss!

https://www.cbsnews.com/philadelphia...n-vote-eagles/

Keep on keepin' on, Griddy!

What is there to deflect? 22 teams voted with the Packers. The Packers were the one that had issue with it, and put it up for vote.

It isnt like the Bears suggested it. But keep trying! Just like the Lions have for 60 years to make a super bowl!

[Siberian13]

Originally Posted by Jaysabz

Pretty badass that the Lions voted no on the ban, being a favorite in the NFC and playing the Eagles head-to-head this year.

My cousin married into a Lions household and lives in Detroit now. Her husband, a lifelong Lions fan, wants to come to the Lions / Eagles game in Philadelphia this year.

I told him probably best he didn't wear a Lions jersey to the game, but he said he's worn Lions gear at all the NFC North Division opponents' stadiums and never had any problems but for verbal sparring. But the Lions / Eagles is a 8:20pm start. The later the start, the rowdier the crowd, generally. I still have time to talk him out of it...

Yeah they the #1 worst fans. Obviously not all of them. Pretty sad adults can’t wear a jersey to support their team at an away game