POLL: Is a 1/1 really a 1/1 of there are 30 1/1s?

[FTLFTL]

There are sets that have five 1/1s for the same player, some with jerseys, some with autographs, some have neither, some just include a picture of the player wearing sunglasses. Are they really 1/1s if there are 30 of them?

[MiamiMarlinsFan]

If they’re all different (even slightly) then yes, there are 30 1/1’s in the set. It is lame of Fanatics to do? Also yes.

[Skipscards]

Originally Posted by MiamiMarlinsFan

If they’re all different (even slightly) then yes, there are 30 1/1’s in the set. It is lame of Fanatics to do? Also yes.

I must agree with my esteemed Marlins colleague.

[Bosoxfan5990]

Any ABCD/YYYY serial numbered card is a 1/1.

Don't @ me.

[Biohazarddfl]

Originally Posted by FTLFTL

There are sets that have five 1/1s for the same player, some with jerseys, some with autographs, some have neither, some just include a picture of the player wearing sunglasses. Are they really 1/1s if there are 30 of them?

You are mostly correct. I'll give the benefit of the doubt to Dynasty which does a 1/1 logo man, then a 1/1 Nike swoosh, 1/1 team logo patch, and 1/1 laundry tag (awful).

Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk

[hermanotarjeta]

Originally Posted by Bosoxfan5990

Any ABCD/YYYY serial numbered card is a 1/1.

Don't @ me.

This is correct.

Don’t fall for artificial scarcity.

Not all serial numbers are created equally.

[89Giants]

No, and this means you Leaf

[ATLOTP]

No. There's a true 1/1; that depends on which product it is. Printing plates are false 1/1s. In the case of something like Leaf, I consider the gold vinyl pattern the true 1/1. It's a real "which one is the true chalice of Christ" scenario.

[Gene]

All right, who's gonna tell this guy about the Archives signature 1 of 1s?

[MiamiMarlinsFan]

Originally Posted by ATLOTP

No. There's a true 1/1; that depends on which product it is. Printing plates are false 1/1s. In the case of something like Leaf, I consider the gold vinyl pattern the true 1/1. It's a real "which one is the true chalice of Christ" scenario.

How is a cyan printing plate a false 1/1?

[ATLOTP]

Originally Posted by MiamiMarlinsFan

How is a cyan printing plate a false 1/1?

I don't make the rules, the market does. I'm simply an adherent.

Originally Posted by Gene

All right, who's gonna tell this guy about the Archives signature 1 of 1s?

False 1/1s. Are they nice? Yes. Are they really 1/1s? No. The same card can be a 1/1 in two years of Archives.

[eastbayak]

For me, if the card shows "1/1" or states "1 of 1"/"One of One" (I might be missing some other version), it's a 1/1 with the exception of those white/black box and national stamped 1/1s (to me, those are fake 1/1s).

Basically, if a card is on a set checklist as a 1/1, it's a 1/1.

[Biohazarddfl]

Originally Posted by Gene

All right, who's gonna tell this guy about the Archives signature 1 of 1s?

Hahaha

Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk

[Giroux]

Leaf?

[Giroux]

Originally Posted by Giroux

Leaf?

https://www.beckett.com/news/2023-le...ootball-cards/

Versions:

Alligator Crystal – 1/1
Alligator Kaleidoscope – 1/1
Alligator Mojo – 1/1
Alligator Prismatic – 1/1
Butterfly Crystal – 1/1
Butterfly Kaleidoscope – 1/1
Butterfly Mojo – 1/1
Butterfly Prismatic – 1/1
Chameleon Crystal – 1/1
Chameleon Kaleidoscope – 1/1
Chameleon Mojo – 1/1
Chameleon Prismatic – 1/1
Clown Fish Crystal – 1/1
Clown Fish Kaleidoscope – 1/1
Clown Fish Mojo – 1/1
Clown Fish Prismatic – 1/1
Deer Crystal – 1/1
Deer Kaleidoscope – 1/1
Deer Mojo – 1/1
Deer Prismatic – 1/1
Dragon Crystal – 1/1
Dragon Kaleidoscope – 1/1
Dragon Mojo – 1/1
Dragon Prismatic – 1/1
Elephant Crystal – 1/1
Elephant Kaleidoscope – 1/1
Elephant Mojo – 1/1
Elephant Prismatic – 1/1
Giraffe Crystal – 1/1
Giraffe Kaleidoscope – 1/1
Giraffe Mojo – 1/1
Giraffe Prismatic – 1/1
Leopard Crystal – 1/1
Leopard Kaleidoscope – 1/1
Leopard Mojo – 1/1
Leopard Prismatic – 1/1
Parrot Crystal – 1/1
Parrot Kaleidoscope – 1/1
Parrot Mojo – 1/1
Parrot Prismatic – 1/1
Peacock Crystal – 1/1
Peacock Kaleidoscope – 1/1
Peacock Mojo – 1/1
Peacock Prismatic – 1/1
Snake Crystal – 1/1
Snake Kaleidoscope – 1/1
Snake Mojo – 1/1
Snake Prismatic – 1/1
Tiger Crystal – 1/1
Tiger Kaleidoscope – 1/1
Tiger Mojo – 1/1
Tiger Prismatic – 1/1
Zebra Crystal – 1/1
Zebra Kaleidoscope – 1/1
Zebra Mojo – 1/1
Zebra Prismatic – 1/1

[here2havefun]

Every card ever printed is a 1/1. When you own a card, and have it in your possession, no one else can own that exact copy. Every card is unique.

[LCM1223]

Originally Posted by Giroux

https://www.beckett.com/news/2023-le...ootball-cards/

Excuse me I just threw up in my mouth a little bit

[corndog]

Manufactured scarcity just doesn't interest me.

[ScooterD]

Originally Posted by corndog

Manufactured scarcity just doesn't interest me.

Always wondered what the definition of manufactured scarcity is/was.

[MiamiMarlinsFan]

Originally Posted by ScooterD

Always wondered what the definition of manufactured scarcity is/was.

Basically numbered parallels/refractors.

In some cases I like it. Like TC blue #/150’s, and especially gold #/50’s, but Topps and Panini have taken it to outrageous lengths over the last 5-ish years.

[DynaEtch]

Originally Posted by ScooterD

Always wondered what the definition of manufactured scarcity is/was.

I like to contrast manufactured scarcity with scarcity from organic means. A 1962 Amazing Fantasy #15 in NM condition is scarce. But it wasn’t intended to be scarce when it was made…there would have been many thousands made, sitting on racks. Problem is people read them, beat them up over the years, and threw them out.

A /5 baseball card is intended to be scarce from the get-go. It is manufactured scarcity. It doesn’t even have to be numbered. Anything that is just made rare from the get go, intended to be scarce (including rare inserts or photo variations etc).

This is not to say manufactured scarcity cannot have organic demand though- it certainly can. A 90s Flair or Ultra Masterpieces 1/1, especially for a key player, has a LOT of organic demand at this point. And that was manufactured scarcity. As were any 90s #’d insert or parallel like PMGs. The question more is whether this absolute ocean of ultra modern manufactured scarcity will retain much value as the years go on…I’m skeptical it will in the longer term.

[JohnnyAppleseed]

Originally Posted by FTLFTL

There are sets that have five 1/1s for the same player, some with jerseys, some with autographs, some have neither, some just include a picture of the player wearing sunglasses. Are they really 1/1s if there are 30 of them?

A question plaguing the hobby since Donruss Diamond Kings and their 40 layers of parallels.

Yes, they are 1/1s. No, they do not have the same value. Yes, when a product has a bunch of 1/1s it devalues all of the 1/1s from that product.

Yes, I wish there was only one 1/1 parallel per product.

[kyle1707]

The false scarcity in this hobby is a joke

But it seems to fool a lot of people

Not surprisingly

[brewtown107]

Just like not all numbered parallels and inserts from the 90s are equally valuable and sought after, such will be the case with today's low numbered parallels and inserts. Something will be valuable and sought after, though.

Most likely not a card--even a 1/1-- from a low tier, unlicensed product that parodies itself with the amount of different "rare" parallels, though.

[DynaEtch]

I think someone else said it…but in this glut of stuff….I would look to the most mainstream set….(Flagship, or like Chrome)….and the most mainstream 1/1 in that set (platinum, superfractor). Longevity is also relevant and I think those are pretty long lasting although I don’t collect much baseball. I mean if you’re gonna weed out the fluff, stick with mainstream and longevity. Or any late 90s 1/1s because they’re in their own category.