PSA Screwup: This one's bad even by their standards

[KhalDrogo]

Originally Posted by PLB9eight

Does anyone really believe PSA is better since Collectors was acquired? Sure they’ve added some stuff here and there but stuff like this is just laughable.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

This is a very unserious question. Joe ran the company into the ground. Don’t forget that when Nat took over, they had to pause submissions and it still took almost a year to get out what was already there.

They grade 1 million cards a month. They are going to make some baffling mistakes. And unlike the old PSA, they will quickly decertify these sorts of mistakes found by the community. If you need them to be perfect, no grading company is for you.

[PLB9eight]

Originally Posted by KhalDrogo

This is a very unserious question. Joe ran the company into the ground. Don’t forget that when Nat took over, they had to pause submissions and it still took almost a year to get out what was already there.

They grade 1 million cards a month. They are going to make some baffling mistakes. And unlike the old PSA, they will quickly decertify these sorts of mistakes found by the community. If you need them to be perfect, no grading company is for you.

Of course mistakes are expected. It’s just funny that when it comes down to the “experts” grading the cards, PSA is a lot more HGA than most realize.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk