2016 Politics Thread - Enter At Your Own Risk - All Politics & Dumb Opinions Here

[jarrodsalas]

Originally Posted by jewcer2k5

I know some nanny's NYC and you are wrong with this statistic.

Ok. Then what is it? Just becasue you know some nanny's doesn't mean you know the statistics.

[cruiserdaddy7]

Originally Posted by JosieD

Controlled her own vagina? That's what we are going with now? So, your penis played no part in the making of your children?

Women are raped every single day and it is significantally under reported.

"A 2013 study found that rape is grossly underreported in the United States.[2] Furthermore, a 2014 study determined that police departments eliminate or undercount rapes from official records in part to "create the illusion of success in fighting violent crime".[3] Based on the available data, 21.8% of American rapes of female victims are gang rapes.[4] For the last reported year, 2013, the prevalence rate for all sexual assaults including rape was 0.1% (prevalence represents the number of victims, rather than the number of assaults since some are victimized more than once during the reporting period). The survey included males and females aged 12+.[5] Since rapes are a subset of all sexual assaults, the prevalence of rape is lower than the combined statistic.[6] Of those assaults, the Bureau of Justice Statistics stated that 34.8% were reported to the police, up from 29.3% in 2004.[7]"

What is alarming about that number is 21% of those raped are gang raped. Could you imagine that? More than 2 guys having their way with you against your will? How much shame, anger, guilt, betryal, etc. would come from that and you have the balls to sit over there and say a women should control her vagina? How about men put it away for a bit and control themselves.

I am against abortion being used as a form of birth control but you probably also want to defund planned parerthood which provides women in low income areas with free birth control. How would you like them to get their birth control thus preventing the abortions without this service?

You see, this is the problem with typical liberals. They make assumptions and run with them.

I have never stated that women should not have access to affordable women's health services. In fact, Trump has said the same. I have no problem with the creation of health clinics for women's health. Planned parenthood has been proven to harvest organs of unborn infants for sale. Shameful.

[cruiserdaddy7]

New terror attack now in Germany. Don't ya just love Hillary Clintons idea to bring in 65,000 Syrians that we know nothing about on a yearly basis? Yay!!

[duwal]

Originally Posted by cruiserdaddy7

New terror attack now in Germany. Don't ya just love Hillary Clintons idea to bring in 65,000 Syrians that we know nothing about on a yearly basis? Yay!!

Terror attack? You aren't talking about the report of shots fired in a shopping mall in Germany are you? Kind of going to an extreme there

[Addison]

Originally Posted by cruiserdaddy7

You see, this is the problem with typical liberals. They make assumptions and run with them.

I have never stated that women should not have access to affordable women's health services. In fact, Trump has said the same. I have no problem with the creation of health clinics for women's health. Planned parenthood has been proven to harvest organs of unborn infants for sale. Shameful.

You know the people behind those fake edited videos were indicted right? The exact opposite conclusion has been proven. Inconvenient...

[JosieD]

Originally Posted by cruiserdaddy7

You see, this is the problem with typical liberals. They make assumptions and run with them.

I have never stated that women should not have access to affordable women's health services. In fact, Trump has said the same. I have no problem with the creation of health clinics for women's health. Planned parenthood has been proven to harvest organs of unborn infants for sale. Shameful.

I don't classify myself as a liberal. And, I said probably as I was trying not to assume. I was asking for clarification.

The issue is they fill a lot of the gaps in areas where there is a great deal of poverty. Also, clinics are not going to pop up over night. What is the plan while they are being built and planned parenthood is defunded?

[jarrodsalas]

Originally Posted by cruiserdaddy7

New terror attack now in Germany. Don't ya just love Hillary Clintons idea to bring in 65,000 Syrians that we know nothing about on a yearly basis? Yay!!

Remember when Germany welcomed them with "Open Arms"? The same people that Hillary wants to bring in? The ones that have know taken over half of Germany...

[ensbergcollecto]

i will just put this out there:

1. it is a sad day when donald trump is a major party candidate in this country

2. hillary is just as bad if not worse.

[jarrodsalas]

Originally Posted by duwal

Terror attack? You aren't talking about the report of shots fired in a shopping mall in Germany are you? Kind of going to an extreme there

10 dead so far and they are locking things down.

[HillbillyCletus]

Originally Posted by jewcer2k5

So is it as appalling that people won't vote for people for those reasons?

Absolutely.

[jewcer2k5]

Originally Posted by jarrodsalas

Ok. Then what is it? Just becasue you know some nanny's doesn't mean you know the statistics.

If I know 100 nanny's that aren't British illegal immigrants then you have to know how many that are to make it 99.9%?

[jewcer2k5]

Originally Posted by cruiserdaddy7

You see, this is the problem with typical liberals. They make assumptions and run with them.

I have never stated that women should not have access to affordable women's health services. In fact, Trump has said the same. I have no problem with the creation of health clinics for women's health. Planned parenthood has been proven to harvest organs of unborn infants for sale. Shameful.

Republicans don't do this?????????

[xavieronly1]

Originally Posted by jewcer2k5

If I know 100 nanny's that aren't British illegal immigrants then you have to know how many that are to make it 99.9%?

Most illegal immigrants don't want to be discovered by the state, and yet, he was able to track them.

Amazing...

[duwal]

Originally Posted by jewcer2k5

Republicans don't do this?????????

As a Republican myself I say yes we do, even more than liberals

[callou2131]

Pretty much

[jewcer2k5]

Originally Posted by xavieronly1

Most illegal immigrants don't want to be discovered by the state, and yet, he was able to track them.

Amazing...

Blows my mind.

A lot of my friends have recently had children and many of them go to specific services for nanny's that are legal (if foreign) and documented so they know who they are hiring. Imagine leaving your child with someone that is illegal and you have no idea of their background. Scary thought there.

[Clarka3]

Originally Posted by Skipscards

I'd say the opposite. He, along with all the primary candidates signed a pledge that they would support the eventual candidate. Clearly they all did this out of fear Trump would run as a third party. But when he won, we got to see just how principled Cruz and some of the others were.

I get why someone wouldn't want to support him, but then don't sign the pledge.

you know what, you're right. I forgot about that pledge garbage.

[Clarka3]

Originally Posted by cruiserdaddy7

You see, this is the problem with typical liberals. They make assumptions and run with them.

I have never stated that women should not have access to affordable women's health services. In fact, Trump has said the same. I have no problem with the creation of health clinics for women's health. Planned parenthood has been proven to harvest organs of unborn infants for sale. Shameful.

for their profit though? i thought the sale was ONLY to cover the costs related to harvesting and storage, and the organs ONLY go to biotech for research.

[Orangejello727]

Originally Posted by cruiserdaddy7

New terror attack now in Germany. Don't ya just love Hillary Clintons idea to bring in 65,000 Syrians that we know nothing about on a yearly basis? Yay!!

Do you know the process when a country accepts Syrian refugees? Specifically the process that the US uses? This came up recently on another forum in conversation. Most people do not realize the process for syrian refugee status to enter the US. Here is how it works... (copied from other source)

T

he administration both screens them and knows where they are from. The Department of Homeland Security leads the process, which involves rigorous background checks. Processing of a refugee can take 18 months to two years, and usually longer for those coming from Syria. Refugees are also subject to in-person interviews and fingerprint and other biometric screening.
For all that caution, U.S. officials acknowledge that the Islamic State group could try to place operatives among refugees. Last year, FBI Director James Comey said data about people coming from Syria may be limited, adding, "If we don't know much about somebody, there won't be anything in our database."

Not saying its full proof of avoiding bad apples. Just wanted to state the facts that vetting of syrian refugees is probably much more strict than for those refugees coming from other countries. Im indifferent about accepting Syrian refugees just for the record.

[greentown]

Originally Posted by jewcer2k5

I know some nanny's NYC and you are wrong with this statistic.

And see, I know some nannies from NYC from my time living there and most of them were. So why does your experience mean my experience isn't valid? And it should have been obvious that was meant in a joking manner.

[Davesportscards]

Originally Posted by cruiserdaddy7

You see, this is the problem with typical liberals. They make assumptions and run with them.

I have never stated that women should not have access to affordable women's health services. In fact, Trump has said the same. I have no problem with the creation of health clinics for women's health. Planned parenthood has been proven to harvest organs of unborn infants for sale. Shameful.

You still believe that?

[jewcer2k5]

Originally Posted by greentown

And see, I know some nannies from NYC from my time living there and most of them were. So why does your experience mean my experience isn't valid? And it should have been obvious that was meant in a joking manner.

You knowing some could mean there are a few. But not 99.9%.

[jarrodsalas]

Originally Posted by Orangejello727

Do you know the process when a country accepts Syrian refugees? Specifically the process that the US uses? This came up recently on another forum in conversation. Most people do not realize the process for syrian refugee status to enter the US. Here is how it works... (copied from other source)

T

Not saying its full proof of avoiding bad apples. Just wanted to state the facts that vetting of syrian refugees is probably much more strict than for those refugees coming from other countries. Im indifferent about accepting Syrian refugees just for the record.

Yeah. Because they keep great records in Syria.

[xavieronly1]

Originally Posted by greentown

And see, I know some nannies from NYC from my time living there and most of them were. So why does your experience mean my experience isn't valid? And it should have been obvious that was meant in a joking manner.

Because your number is not valid. In fact, it is stupid.

[greentown]

Originally Posted by xavieronly1

Most illegal immigrants don't want to be discovered by the state, and yet, he was able to track them.

Amazing...

They are not exactly in hiding here. All you heard on the news here at the end of the last school year was about this amazing Mexican girl who was here illegally but was valedictorian of her class and how she was getting a free ride to the University of Texas.