![]() |
|
|||||||
| BASKETBALL Post your Basketball Cards Hobby Talk |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
|
Here's the exact math.
250 cards with a "Galactic" parallel 150 cards with a "Futura" parallel /25 I've seen probably 15 cases opened and all cases have had EXACTLY 2 Galactic and 2 Futura cards (1 per inner case). So: 150 (cards with the Futura parallel) x 25 (Futura parallel numbering) = 3750 Futura cards in total 3750 (Futura print run) / 2 (Futura parallels per case) = 1875 cases So the galactic would be: 2 (Galactic parallels per case) x 1875 cases (the case run based on Futura math) = 3750 Galactic parallels 3750 (cards with Galactic parallel) / 250 (total cards with a Galactic Parallel) = 15, the print run of each Galactic card Here's the math with pack odds (showstopper parallel) 1875 cases x 16 boxes per case x 8 packs per box = 240,000 packs 240,000 packs / 1323 packs (odds of showstopper Galactic) = 181.40 181.40 (total showstopper galactics) / 12 (number of cards in the showstopper set) = 15.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
|
NICE WORK, GeechQuest! By chance, any thoughts on the print runs for this years Prizm refractors or Complete Golds? Not sure Complete can be reverse engineered because it didn't have any numbered cards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
Haven't busted Complete or even seen it opened, but if you get a big enough sample size it can definately be reversed engineered. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
|
Prizm is much harder because of all the different versions you have (Hobby, Jumbo, Blaster, Rack Pack, Pack). The Silver Prizm versions are in all of them for the base and in most of them for the inserts.
__________________
Basketball Sets: Threads Century Greats Jerseys - Innovation Stat Line Jerseys Soccer Sets: 2018 World Cup Prizm Peru Parallels - 2015 Select Soccer Peru Parallels Players: Red Bulls Parallels, 17-18 Thibs Prizms, Soccer Legends Autos |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 27,556
|
I wish I could do math
__________________
Board man. Board man gets paid. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
|
Something does not compute here.....
Suppose to be 1 numbered card per box (at least I guess, so lets just take the minimum 1 to be conservative) There are 150 + 33 + 30 + 12 + 25 Different Cosmic /100 = 25000 numbered cards 150 Sunburst (/75) and Futura /25 = 15000 numbered total numbered cards = 40000 Assume best case scenario ALL are inserted then there are 2500 max cases, 40000 boxes. 320K packs. The 'stated' odds of 1:288 for galactic base means even if you discount completely ALL subset galactics there are at most 320K/ 288*150 ~ 7.5 to 8 of each galactic base. (inserted) If the galactics subsets are included at same odds then there are less than 5 of each.... This is NOT including who know how many they kept UNPACKED, for whatever reason or reward store. Are they really that rare? So far they seem much more readily available considering a case of 16 boxes have 144 packs and most cases have 1-2 Galactics....whereas stated odds means they should be 1 per 2 case. (Obviously they could either have front loaded the early cases...., or maybe the subset Galactics are less rare...dont think it is the case so far) Or could it be another case of 2012-13 Panini Contenders.....when they first released the odds for HoF contender (at 1:20 cases) and RoY Contender (1:13 cases), alot of people bought them at stupid prices and then it turned out they were approximately 1 per case and not as rare....
__________________
No Longer Use Stinkbay:special:! Woot |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
|
My guess is they are NOT really 1:288 packs....and are at similar insertion to the Futuras....but maybe there are more not released....
Another thing it remind me is the 2004-05 Upper Deck Spectrum vs Immaculate....whereas alot of ppl believe the Immaculate are more rare, when in reality they are the same insertion rate
__________________
No Longer Use Stinkbay:special:! Woot |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
|
LOL cant tell if it is sarcasm.
We could all put finger up in the air and come up with an unicorn number
__________________
No Longer Use Stinkbay:special:! Woot |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
The exact math is done above but you are right and there are inconsistencies (when using Panini's pack odds) Assuming each card has a print run of 15 (and I'm 99.99% sure that they do) here's what the breakdown would look like within each set: Base Set (150 total cards x 15) = 2250 Galactics New Wave (30 total cards x 15) = 450 Galactics Rookie Revolution ( 25 total cards x 15) = 375 Galactics Icons ( 33 total cards x 15) = 495 Galactics Showstoppers ( 12 total cards x 15) = 180 Galactics For a total of 3750 total Galactics, as referenced above. If you reverse engineer the odds for each insert set (using the case run/pack run from above) you'll come out to this as well: New Wave ( 1:528 packs): 240,000 / 528 (odds) = 454.54 454.54 / 30 (total cards in set) = 15.15 Rookie Revolution ( 1:632 packs): 240,000 / 632 (odds) = 379.74 379.74 / 25 (total cards in set) = 15.18 Icons ( 1:483 packs): 240,000 / 483 = 496.89 496.89 / 33 (total cards in set) = 15.05 Showstoppers ( 1:1323 packs): 240,000 / 1323 = 181.40 181.40 / 12 (total cards in set) = 15.11 Then you come to the Base Galactic ![]() Base (1:288 packs): 240,000 / 288 = 833.33 833.33 / 150 (total cards in set) = 5.55 ![]() That doesn't make any sense whatsoever based on any observation of the case breaks. EVERY SINGLE MASTER CASE HAS 2 GALACTICS! There is 1 per inner case. If Panini's odds were real, then somebody should have opened a case (inner or master) without a Galactic, but I've yet to see it done. I have no clue where the 288 number came from, but guaranteed the real odds of the Galactic Base is 1:96 packs. This would put it's print run at 15, and line up with pulling 2 Galactics per master case. I could show the math, although it's a lot more complicated, but in short the odds stated are for pulling a "certain" type (base or insert) of Galactic, not pulling "any" type Galactic. If you open 8 boxes out of an inner case, you will be guaranteed 1 Galactic, 1 Futura, and 2 autos. So the actual odds of pulling "any" Galactic are exactly the same as pulling a Futura, even if the Futura has a higher print run. TL;DR
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: US
Posts: 1,455
|
They should have just numbered them!
__________________
Goat count Kobe Autos:0; Lebron Autos:0; Jordan Autos:1; Brady Autos:0; Rodgers Autos:1; Scrub Count Scrub Autos:1000s |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
|
No sarcasm here
Just nice that someone did the math on this since a lot of people were thinking about the print runs.But, you know...how much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?
__________________
PC : Anthony Davis, Stephen Curry & too many other side PC's https://www.instagram.com/AnthonyDavisCards/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 5,005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 4,303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Member
|
Geech! Can I recruit you to tell me print run on 2000-01 topps gold label leather jersey insert????
Nvm I think I figured it out ..... /25
__________________
Check out my Ron Harper collection and wantlist! https://www.flickr.com/photos/144848597@N06/albums http://ronharper.weebly.com/ Last edited by Harper; 04-01-2016 at 08:29 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 864
|
So far, I know of three different Kawhi base Galactics that have been pulled. I've seen 2 each of many other players, but the 3 kawhi's are the most of one card I've noticed so far. Just throwing that out there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Germany
Posts: 519
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 4,303
|
Im a fan. Just got these in. More on the way. A lot of the top guys haven't even shown up yet. I'd say /15 is accurate. Gorgeous cards in hand.
Last edited by rauchand; 04-05-2016 at 06:58 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,401
|
I picked up the Rodney Hood from eBay. I can't wait to see what it looks like in hand. Here is the picture from the listing;
__________________
PC: Reggie Evans
LF: Reggie Evans - Bismack Biyombo - Marc Gasol Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/143199198@N02/albums |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,401
|
Quote:
http://www.blowoutcards.com/forums/b...evolution.html
__________________
PC: Reggie Evans
LF: Reggie Evans - Bismack Biyombo - Marc Gasol Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/143199198@N02/albums |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Member
|
I was super lucky and pulled this out of one of the 3 boxes that I purchased
IMG_3113 by Nate Flesher, on FlickrIt's PC and I'm not selling. Have yet to see another surface.
__________________
PC's: Revolution Galactic, LeBron, Matthew Stafford, & Shiny Stuff Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/130031161@N07/albums/with/72157664643757362 Instagram: nfunkcollection |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
Still stands that at the odds indicated these should be popping up much rarer than they are (at half to a third the frequency) Still doesnt add up Another thing is Panini should stop putting out low serialled cards, and just put in the astronomical odds to pull them, people clearly pay way more for those than similar print run serial cards. I think the card company is catching on somewhat though after 7 years
__________________
No Longer Use Stinkbay:special:! Woot |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 900
|
I'm going to be the jackass that asks what stands out on the galactic to let you know you in fact have a galactic? They all look too similar to me...
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|