Would you vote for Pete Rose? Do you believe him? - Page 2

3of5-2 · 12-14-2015, 10:34 PM

Got to see him in person against the Cardinals. Saw him turn a single to right field into a double with a head first slide on pure hustle. Would like to see him get in before I die.

roro17 · 12-14-2015, 10:36 PM

I would but then you have to vote in the 1919 Blacksox guys, shoeless joe etc. Then eventually the steroid guys.

seabass97166 · 12-14-2015, 10:48 PM

My guess is they have proof of him betting against his own team while he was Manager.

Whodey14 · 12-16-2015, 07:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LCM1223

Why else do you let someone in the HOF?

I forgot everyone in the hof is a perfect human being and their on field merits come second. What an idiot.

SaveMeTheGum · 12-16-2015, 07:51 PM

I don't believe him.

I believe he should be in the HOF. For 20+ years Pete Rose was baseball. Let him in.

Soxrule111 · 12-16-2015, 07:56 PM

I would vote him 100%, don't care about anything other than his playing stuff.

Het Bet, so what (I know) but football players have Fantasy Football teams, that betting. They should all be banned as well then.

Take him for his playing career for the HOF and leave the rest of the #@#@#@#@ out.

jmscoggin · 12-16-2015, 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ck6599

Put him in the Hall for his baseball accomplishments, but don't allow him anywhere near day to day MLB activities. He should not hold a job in baseball because he is a dispicable human being.

Exactly this.

LCM1223 · 12-16-2015, 08:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Whodey14

I forgot everyone in the hof is a perfect human being and their on field merits come second. What an idiot.

I'm so confused by this comment. I think you just misinterpreted my questioning.

Skipscards · 12-16-2015, 09:00 PM

The Hall should have never made him ineligible. The black sox were never ineligible for induction, the voters just never put any of them in. The voters can sort out whther they want to put him in based on all criteria (including character). If they put him in, great. If they don't, fine. But saying he can't even be considerd is stupid. Even the cheaters get to be considered.

JohnRyno · 12-16-2015, 09:02 PM

His Sketcher's commercials are an egregious miscarriage of justice.

Whodey14 · 12-16-2015, 09:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LCM1223

I'm so confused by this comment. I think you just misinterpreted my questioning.

I was actually cosigning your ideas. Sorry I now see how it could be taken.

LCM1223 · 12-16-2015, 09:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Whodey14

I was actually cosigning your ideas. Sorry I now see how it could be taken.

Ohhhh that makes sense now. I'm with ya

BGT Masters · 12-16-2015, 09:36 PM

I would vote yes.

go_steelers07 · 12-16-2015, 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LCM1223

I'm so confused by this comment. I think you just misinterpreted my questioning.

I think he is agreeing with you and calling the guy you quoted an idiot

EDIT: now I'm the idiot... I should have kept reading ...........

Whodey14 · 12-16-2015, 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by go_steelers07

I think he is agreeing with you and calling the guy you quoted an idiot

EDIT: now I'm the idiot... I should have kept reading ...........

I found this confusion quite hilarious haha.

12-16-2015, 07:51 PM	#30
SaveMeTheGum Member Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: NH --> CA --> SC Posts: 16,744 Cardboard_Dynamite CardboardDynamite	I don't believe him. I believe he should be in the HOF. For 20+ years Pete Rose was baseball. Let him in. __________________ Pay fast. Ship fast. Deal with people honestly. IG: CardboardDynamite

12-16-2015, 07:56 PM	#31
Soxrule111 Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: DeKalb Posts: 14,861 Soxrule111	I would vote him 100%, don't care about anything other than his playing stuff. Het Bet, so what (I know) but football players have Fantasy Football teams, that betting. They should all be banned as well then. Take him for his playing career for the HOF and leave the rest of the #@#@#@#@ out. __________________ Texans Future Super Bowl Champions

12-16-2015, 09:00 PM	#34
Skipscards Member Join Date: Oct 2012 Location: In Tribute To The Great Ryno Posts: 30,241 jlankf2 jmp4	The Hall should have never made him ineligible. The black sox were never ineligible for induction, the voters just never put any of them in. The voters can sort out whther they want to put him in based on all criteria (including character). If they put him in, great. If they don't, fine. But saying he can't even be considerd is stupid. Even the cheaters get to be considered. __________________ Go Royals!! #RoyalsIn2015 <---It Happened!! #TEAMZinck Sometimes it is astounding that we are able to persist in a world so full of morons.

12-14-2015, 10:34 PM	#26
3of5-2 Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 987	Got to see him in person against the Cardinals. Saw him turn a single to right field into a double with a head first slide on pure hustle. Would like to see him get in before I die.

12-14-2015, 10:36 PM	#27
roro17 Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Chicago Illinois Posts: 6,309 roro17	I would but then you have to vote in the 1919 Blacksox guys, shoeless joe etc. Then eventually the steroid guys.

12-14-2015, 10:48 PM	#28
seabass97166 Banned Join Date: Feb 2015 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 10,685	My guess is they have proof of him betting against his own team while he was Manager.

12-16-2015, 09:02 PM	#35
JohnRyno Banned Join Date: Nov 2012 Location: Fairway in Regulation Posts: 12,248 johnryno2012 johnryno	His Sketcher's commercials are an egregious miscarriage of justice.

12-16-2015, 09:36 PM	#38
BGT Masters Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Wellsville, New York Posts: 10,184	I would vote yes.