Blowout Cards Forums
AD Heritage

Go Back   Blowout Cards Forums > BLOWOUTS HOBBY TALK > Topps Now & The Living Sets

Notices

Topps Now & The Living Sets Post your Topps Now Hobby Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-10-2017, 04:22 PM   #10626
joejoemay
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: New Braunfels Texas
Posts: 9,898
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by armstrong View Post
I've seen two different /10 gold Baez on ebay. I forgot there numbers, but they were different.

I've seen the 1/1 russell, it's not in the best of shape (not mine).
I've added the Russell but still have only seen the one Gold /10 Baez.
joejoemay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2017, 04:30 PM   #10627
joejoemay
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: New Braunfels Texas
Posts: 9,898
Default

Updated...THINK I GOT THEM ALL (NOT KEEPING TRACK OF ALL SN's FOUND JUST ONE)...SAVE FOR THE 1/10'S and only then till my theory is completely (in my mind) debunked

Number Name Color SN CF
NO RIZZOS
WS-3A Anthony Rizzo ?????????? NSN ??????????
WS-3B NSTD ?????????? of 199 ??????????
WS-3C NSTD ?????????? of 99 ??????????
WS-3D NSTD ?????????? of 49 ??????????
WS-3E NSTD ?????????? of 25 ??????????
WS-3F NSTD ?????????? of 10 ??????????
WS-3G NSTD ?????????? of 1 ??????????
NO 1/1 BAEZ
WS-4A Javier Baez Plain NSN Confirmed
WS-4B Javier Baez Green 178 of 199 Confirmed
WS-4C Javier Baez Blue 1 of 99 Confirmed
WS-4D Javier Baez Purple 30 of 49 Confirmed
WS-4E Javier Baez Red 20 of 25 Confirmed
WS-4F Javier Baez Gold 7 of 10 Confirmed
WS-4G NSTD ?????????? ??????????
NO 1/199 BRYANT
WS-5A Kris Bryant Plain NSN Confirmed
WS-5B NSTD ?????????? of 199 ??????????
WS-5C Kris Bryant Blue 73 of 99 Confirmed
WS-5D Kris Bryant Purple 43 of 49 Confirmed
WS-5E Kris Bryant Red 2 of 25 Confirmed
WS-5F Kris Bryant Gold 9 of 10 Confirmed
WS-5? Kris Bryant Red 1 of 1 Confirmed
NO PLAIN, 199 OR 1/49 RUSSELL
WS-6A Addison Russell ?????????? ? ??????????
WS-6B NSTD ?????????? ??????????
WS-6C NSTD Blue 43 of 99 Confirmed
WS-6? NSTD ?????????? ??????????
WS-6D Addison Russell Red 18 of 25 Confirmed
WS-6E Addison Russell Gold 10 Of 10 Confirmed
WS-6F Addison Russell Red 1 of 1 Confirmed
NO 1/10 OR 1/1 HEYWARD
WS-9A Jason Heyward Plain ? Confirmed
WS-9B Jason Heyward Green 36 Of 199 Confirmed
WS-9C Jason Heyward Blue 39 of 99 Confirmed
WS-9D Jason Heyward Red 25 of 25 Confirmed
WS-9E NSTD ?????????? of 10 ??????????
WS-9F NSTD ?????????? of 1 ??????????
NO /25, /10 OR 1/1 SCHWARBER
WS-10A Kyle Schwarber Plain ? Confirmed
WS-10A Kyle Schwarber Green 107 Of 199 Confirmed
WS-10C Kyle Schwarber Blue 6 of 99 Confirmed
WS-10D Kyle Schwarber Purple 11 of 49 Confirmed
WS-10E NSTD ?????????? of 25 ??????????
WS-10F NSTD ?????????? of 10 ??????????
WS-10G NSTD ?????????? of 1 ??????????
NO 1/25 OR 1/1 CONTRERAS
WS-11A Willson Contreras Plain ? Confirmed
WS-11B Willson Contreras Green 117 Of 199 Confirmed
WS-11C Willson Contreras Blue 20 of 99 Confirmed
WS-11D Willson Contreras Purple 14 of 49 Confirmed
WS-11E NSTD ?????????? of 25 ??????????
WS-11F Willson Contreras Gold ? of 10 Confirmed
WS-11G NSTD ?????????? of 1 ??????????
NO PLAIN OR 1/49 ALMORA
WS-16A Albert Almora Jr ?????????? ? ??????????
WS-16B Albert Almora Jr Green 1 of 199 Confirmed
WS-16C Albert Almora Jr Blue 68 of 99 Confirmed
WS-16D NSTD ?????????? of 49 ??????????
WS-16E Albert Almora Jr Red ? Of 25 Confirmed
WS-16F NSTD ?????????? of 10 ??????????
joejoemay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2017, 04:38 PM   #10628
mlbexpert
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 2,245
Default

/49 ARuss was confirmed earlier.
And you are missing /49 Heyward on your list- which is unconfirmed I believe.
mlbexpert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2017, 04:42 PM   #10629
armstrong
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 1,717
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by joejoemay View Post
I've added the Russell but still have only seen the one Gold /10 Baez.

Baez - one was 07/10 and the other was 05/10.
armstrong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2017, 04:45 PM   #10630
mlbexpert
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 2,245
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by armstrong View Post
Baez - one was 07/10 and the other was 05/10.
Both completed listings on eBay. I believe we can say your theory is debunked.
mlbexpert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2017, 04:45 PM   #10631
armstrong
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 1,717
Default

I'm pretty sure there are no rizzo. How they plan on distributing them I'm not sure. It would suck if they decided to "distribute" the rizzo's in "other topps" products like Northy mentioned before.
armstrong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2017, 04:49 PM   #10632
joejoemay
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: New Braunfels Texas
Posts: 9,898
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mlbexpert View Post
/49 ARuss was confirmed earlier.
And you are missing /49 Heyward on your list- which is unconfirmed I believe.
Corrected
joejoemay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2017, 04:49 PM   #10633
joejoemay
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: New Braunfels Texas
Posts: 9,898
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by armstrong View Post
Baez - one was 07/10 and the other was 05/10.
OK I believe that...theory debunked.
joejoemay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2017, 04:50 PM   #10634
joejoemay
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: New Braunfels Texas
Posts: 9,898
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by armstrong View Post
I'm pretty sure there are no rizzo. How they plan on distributing them I'm not sure. It would suck if they decided to "distribute" the rizzo's in "other topps" products like Northy mentioned before.
Or wait till next year and send them out to buyers of the new 2017 product.
joejoemay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2017, 04:55 PM   #10635
Ferg1945
Member
 
Ferg1945's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Midwest
Posts: 14,719
Default

So the Bryzzo isn't gonna happen? Who do I see about a refund?
Ferg1945 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2017, 04:56 PM   #10636
mlbexpert
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 2,245
Default

I added up all the confirmed WS autos and that means we have 2100 autos accounted for.

That leaves no more than 481 autos for unserialized cards. And probably less if we confirm some additional /10 or /49s.

With 5 players confirmed to have unserialized autos, if no additional confirmed autos, we'd be at ~96 each if they signed equally. And I'm guessing they didn't. I'm thinking the unserialized ones will be more rare than /199 and /99
mlbexpert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2017, 05:01 PM   #10637
armstrong
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 1,717
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mlbexpert View Post
I added up all the confirmed WS autos and that means we have 2100 autos accounted for.

That leaves no more than 481 autos for unserialized cards. And probably less if we confirm some additional /10 or /49s.

With 5 players confirmed to have unserialized autos, if no additional confirmed autos, we'd be at ~96 each if they signed equally. And I'm guessing they didn't. I'm thinking the unserialized ones will be more rare than /199 and /99
agree
armstrong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2017, 05:05 PM   #10638
mlbexpert
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 2,245
Default

If the missing /49s, /25s, /10s, etc. for known players get accounted for, that leaves ~300 autos for unserialized. Split equally across 5 known signers equals about 60 each.

Okay, this was fun. Thanks for all the insights from others. I'm going to guess PRs look like 50-100 for unserialized for each player.
mlbexpert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2017, 05:11 PM   #10639
joejoemay
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: New Braunfels Texas
Posts: 9,898
Default

No matter how you slice it (so far) the Unnumbered ones are going to be less then the /199's and most likely less then the /99

2583 PR subtract the 2105 and you have 438 unaccounted for cards. No Plain Almora, Russell or Rizzo gives you about 110 each of the others plain and we are most likely not seeing the /49 Almora /25 Contreras, the 10 and 25 Schwarber's and the 49 and 10 Heywards. Add those in...you have only 270 to split. That would be a PR of about /67 each for the unnumbered. Just a guess though...
joejoemay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2017, 05:13 PM   #10640
armstrong
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 1,717
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by joejoemay View Post
No matter how you slice it (so far) the Unnumbered ones are going to be less then the /199's and most likely less then the /99

2583 PR subtract the 2105 and you have 438 unaccounted for cards. No Plain Almora, Russell or Rizzo gives you about 110 each of the others plain and we are most likely not seeing the /49 Almora /25 Contreras, the 10 and 25 Schwarber's and the 49 and 10 Heywards. Add those in...you have only 270 to split. That would be a PR of about /67 each for the unnumbered. Just a guess though...
The unnumbered ones also look better than some of the colored ones out there too.
armstrong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2017, 05:15 PM   #10641
joejoemay
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: New Braunfels Texas
Posts: 9,898
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by joejoemay View Post
No matter how you slice it (so far) the Unnumbered ones are going to be less then the /199's and most likely less then the /99

2583 PR subtract the 2105 and you have 438 unaccounted for cards. No Plain Almora, Russell or Rizzo gives you about 110 each of the others plain and we are most likely not seeing the /49 Almora /25 Contreras, the 10 and 25 Schwarber's and the 49 and 10 Heywards. Add those in...you have only 270 to split. That would be a PR of about /67 each for the unnumbered. Just a guess though...
Right 5 not 4...darn it! And add not subtract....
joejoemay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2017, 05:16 PM   #10642
joejoemay
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: New Braunfels Texas
Posts: 9,898
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by armstrong View Post
The unnumbered ones also look better than some of the colored ones out there too.
Well I'm happy with my 2/25 RED Bryant, that looks just like the 1/1 Red Bryant.

Kind of silly if you ask me.
joejoemay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2017, 05:17 PM   #10643
mlbexpert
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 2,245
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by armstrong View Post
The unnumbered ones also look better than some of the colored ones out there too.
Agreed. I pulled a /49 Contreras, but have never been a fan of the purple. May sell and try to sub with a plain one.
mlbexpert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2017, 05:17 PM   #10644
mlbexpert
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 2,245
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by joejoemay View Post
Well I'm happy with my 2/25 RED Bryant, that looks just like the 1/1 Red Bryant.

Kind of silly if you ask me.
Ha - true that! Lucky guy!
mlbexpert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2017, 05:24 PM   #10645
joejoemay
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: New Braunfels Texas
Posts: 9,898
Default

It will come down to looks I think...I think the Green look like crap but I'd buy one to fill a whole till I get a better one. The next worse (for me) would be the Plain as it is un numbered and folks want those numbers. I'd shoot for a blue across the board for my set, so I may sell my Red in the end but only to pay for the blues. Of course a graded BGS 9.5 or better is a must so it may take some time. I'm not a real fan of the Purple or the Gold so I will pass on them unless for some insane reason they get cheap.
joejoemay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2017, 05:24 PM   #10646
armstrong
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 1,717
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by joejoemay View Post
Well I'm happy with my 2/25 RED Bryant, that looks just like the 1/1 Red Bryant.

Kind of silly if you ask me.
1000% agree. What's the point of a 1/1 red when you have 25 other reds that literally look the same color wise? Bad move on Topps Now and Fred's part.
armstrong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2017, 05:33 PM   #10647
joejoemay
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: New Braunfels Texas
Posts: 9,898
Default

FYI, I sold one of the #DYI WWE cards to Tommaso Ciampa's wife...she was told by Topps that they would get a copy of the card but Topps wouldn't print any extras only the ones sold on-line.

I got $50 and a signed 8x10 of Tommaso and Johnny as well as their first tag team card (Slam Attax Takeover - #279 Johnny Gargano & Tommaso Ciampa).
Not a big fan of WWE but I thought it was cool...right along the lines of selling to Trevor Story's family.
joejoemay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2017, 06:07 PM   #10648
mlbexpert
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 2,245
Default

The activity in the thread today really made me miss baseball. Spring Training (and new Topps Now) can't come quick enough!
mlbexpert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2017, 08:51 PM   #10649
wilsonj12
Inactive Account
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 544
Default

Cubs may visit White House on Monday ... wonderful if there'd be a Topps Now card for it?

Cubs Will Reportedly Visit the White House on Monday
wilsonj12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2017, 09:26 PM   #10650
Ferg1945
Member
 
Ferg1945's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Midwest
Posts: 14,719
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wilsonj12 View Post
Cubs may visit White House on Monday ... wonderful if there'd be a Topps Now card for it?

Cubs Will Reportedly Visit the White House on Monday
Topps... Bryzzos to White House... STAT!!!
Ferg1945 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © 2019, Blowout Cards Inc.