2016 Politics Thread - Enter At Your Own Risk - All Politics & Dumb Opinions Here - Page 346

tke1600 · 10-13-2016, 11:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoxBreaker72

You gotta ask yourself at some point why there is an obvious, sickening bias by the media in favor of Clinton.

It's not due to her amazing record or competent service. She is more flawed than Trump. She didn't know what classified marks looked like??!!?! WHAT!?!?!

As more of these emails come out I am absolutely amazed by what I'm seeing.

What is facinating to me is trying to figure out what's really going on with all the lies and misinformation being pumped from all angles. When you read all the content in Wikilekas and then see literally 25 different hit job headlines on Trump's character from the MSM, with no mention of Clinton, it really is mind boggling to try and figure out what is really causing all of it.

BoxBreaker72 · 10-13-2016, 11:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tke1600

What is facinating to me is trying to figure out what's really going on with all the lies and misinformation being pumped from all angles. When you read all the content in Wikilekas and then see literally 25 different hit job headlines on Trump's character from the MSM, with no mention of Clinton, it really is mind boggling to try and figure out what is really causing all of it.

I was never a believer in "secret societies" or NWO, but the last few weeks have me questioning everything I have ever thought about the world.

My instincts tell me there are people behind the scenes here controlling everything.

And I guess I should go commit myself, because that sounds crazy even while typing it.

NeilCO · 10-13-2016, 11:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoxBreaker72

Jessica Leeds, the woman all over CNN doesn't even know where she was coming back from on the flight to NY!!! Maybe Texas.. Maybe not. Doesn't know what time of year it was.. wants to say Fall... Yet she remembers every detail of Trump grinding all over her on a plane.

BS.

Edit- she remembers word for what what he said to her the second "random" time she met him. He called her some random derogatory name but she won't go into detail. She obviously couldn't make something up on the spot.

People need to wake up. This is beyond anything I have ever seen. It's like a movie we are living in.

I obviously have no idea if all these stories are true, partially true, or completely false, but this seems pretty consistent with distant memories to me.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

BoxBreaker72 · 10-13-2016, 11:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NeilCO

I obviously have no idea if all these stories are true, partially true, or completely false, but this seems pretty consistent with distant memories to me.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

If something like that happens to someone on a plane, they shouldn't forget details like that. Unless she was a very frequent flyer. Possibly she was. A very famous person sexually assaulting you? I mean, you have to bookmark that day in your mind forever? no?

tke1600 · 10-13-2016, 11:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoxBreaker72

I was never a believer in "secret societies" or NWO, but the last few weeks have me questioning everything I have ever thought about the world.

My instincts tell me there are people behind the scenes here controlling everything.

And I guess I should go commit myself, because that sounds crazy even while typing it.

My guess is that Hillary knows they may drop a bomb on her at anytime, so she is having her MSM minions running the presses to distract from that future event. I would guess a sex scandal so that she can play the propoganda card when it hits.

NeilCO · 10-13-2016, 11:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoxBreaker72

If something like that happens to someone on a plane, they shouldn't forget details like that. Unless she was a very frequent flyer. Possibly she was. A very famous person sexually assaulting you? I mean, you have to bookmark that day in your mind forever? no?

Sure, but it seems natural to bookmark the details of the assault itself rather than peripheral details like where she was coming from, many years later. You're right, though, that it depends how frequently she flew. If she flew once every five years, she should be able to remember. If she flew some place new every six months, not so easy to remember.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

coltsnsox07 · 10-13-2016, 11:51 PM

There's an article on MSN '14 Photos of U.S. Presidents Before And After The White House', I wonder if JFK is in there..

BoxBreaker72 · 10-14-2016, 12:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NeilCO

Sure, but it seems natural to bookmark the details of the assault itself rather than peripheral details like where she was coming from, many years later. You're right, though, that it depends how frequently she flew. If she flew once every five years, she should be able to remember. If she flew some place new every six months, not so easy to remember.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Good points.

In my crazy mind, I am thinking she is avoiding details like that because her story could be shot down with extensive research I would imagine. Not pinning herself down, you know? The whole thing sounded very rehearsed and pre-planned.

If it's proven she's telling the truth, I obviously support her in coming out.

NeedChapmans · 10-14-2016, 12:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoxBreaker72

Good points.

In my crazy mind, I am thinking she is avoiding details like that because her story could be shot down with extensive research I would imagine. Not pinning herself down, you know? The whole thing sounded very rehearsed and pre-planned.

If it's proven she's telling the truth, I obviously support her in coming out.

It was over 30 years ago. The NYTimes knows it can't be proven one way or another, so they're off the hook (and why they published it).

Impossible to prove, disprove.

BoxBreaker72 · 10-14-2016, 12:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NeedChapmans

It was over 30 years ago. The NYTimes knows it can't be proven one way or another, so they're off the hook (and why they published it).

Impossible to prove, disprove.

Well, there it is.. Thanks NC.

Obvious hit piece in my mind now.

NeedChapmans · 10-14-2016, 12:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoxBreaker72

Well, there it is.. Thanks NC.

Obvious hit piece in my mind now.

Witnesses? Impossible. Video? Impossible. I'm willing to bet Trump doesn't even remember who this person is.

The only thing Trump can do to defend himself is chip away at the minor details of the story (arm-rest, location, time of day) ... whatever, and even if he's able to provide beyond a shadow of a doubt that one of the details is wrong, all the accuser would have to say is "I guess it's possible it was a morning flight, it happened such a long time ago" ... and you're back at square one.

As is true of the incident that took place 13 years ago at a Ray Charles concert (where the woman isn't even sure if she was assaulted) and again so many years ago when Trump supposedly just started kissing a woman he was introduced to.

They're indefensible in the sense that the encounters were likely so casual in nature to everyone around ... they're not memorable to anyone other than the accuser IF they happened (and perhaps Trump). A media outlet like the Times, who's printed thousands of target pieces at Trump this year was salivating at this kind of opportunity ... and they took it.

BoxBreaker72 · 10-14-2016, 12:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NeedChapmans

Witnesses? Impossible. Video? Impossible. I'm willing to bet Trump doesn't even remember who this person is.

The only thing Trump can do to defend himself is chip away at the minor details of the story (arm-rest, location, time of day) ... whatever, and even if he's able to provide beyond a shadow of a doubt that one of the details is wrong, all the accuser would have to say is "I guess it's possible it was a morning flight, it happened such a long time ago" ... and you're back at square one.

As is true of the incident that took place 13 years ago at a Ray Charles concert (where the woman isn't even sure if she was assaulted) and again so many years ago when Trump supposedly just started kissing a woman he was introduced to.

They're indefensible in the sense that the encounters were likely so casual in nature to everyone around ... they're not memorable to anyone other than the accuser IF they happened (and perhaps Trump). A media outlet like the Times, who's printed thousands of target pieces at Trump this year was salivating at this kind of opportunity ... and they took it.

All good points..

I was under the impression that this was going to court. And that she would have to prove this. When you combine all of that with the timing of this now, it can't be anything but a Clinton plant IMO.

And that sucks, because stuff like this is so serious and shouldn't be used for political advantage or hit jobs. And that's all that's happening.

tacoma34 · 10-14-2016, 04:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nyfancam01

I'm already proud of HILLARY CLINTON! Our next great leader of this country. She's going to do a fantastic job!!!

CLINTON 2016

Your comments are the equivalent of pinoymamba's nauseating posts about Panini.

babyfaceposey · 10-14-2016, 04:53 AM

Sorry meant to post this last night.

BUSTED: @NYTimes Trump Accuser #RachelCrooks Is LYING According To Family Friend - GotNews

pac213up · 10-14-2016, 05:07 AM

I am just curious to see what happens to the Republican Party after this election. You lose to Hillary Clinton after 2 beatdowns from Obama. Will they adjust the platform to account for demographic shifts or are they going to continue down this path and give themselves such a small margin of error in a national election. It is only going to get more difficult for them.

NeilCO · 10-14-2016, 05:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by babyfaceposey

Sorry meant to post this last night.

BUSTED: @NYTimes Trump Accuser #RachelCrooks Is LYING According To Family Friend - GotNews

Quite the source. Both in the sense that you're citing a "news source" that refers to the victim as "Lying Rachel Crooks" and in the sense that the entire piece is about the social media accusations of a person who claims to "know the family."

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Addison · 10-14-2016, 05:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NeilCO

Quite the source. Both in the sense that you're citing a "news source" that refers to the victim as "Lying Rachel Crooks" and in the sense that the entire piece is about the social media accusations of a person who claims to "know the family."

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You can always grant validation to news sites that publishes articles apologizing for a sex offender...

ANALYSIS: The Lynching Of Brock Turner #BrockTurner - GotNews

babyfaceposey · 10-14-2016, 06:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NeilCO

Quite the source. Both in the sense that you're citing a "news source" that refers to the victim as "Lying Rachel Crooks" and in the sense that the entire piece is about the social media accusations of a person who claims to "know the family."

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Considering that NYT is running the Trump accusations my source is fitting. Family friends facebook posts.

The msm will not post anything that could discredit these women.

babyfaceposey · 10-14-2016, 06:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Addison

You can always grant validation to news sites that publishes articles apologizing for a sex offender...

ANALYSIS: The Lynching Of Brock Turner #BrockTurner - GotNews

Don't think I posted a link to this story. Nice try. Family friend discredits Trump accuser and you link this bs.

Panthersfans · 10-14-2016, 06:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by babyfaceposey

Don't think I posted a link to this story. Nice try. Family friend discredits Trump accuser and you link this bs.

He prefers you stick to completely unbiased media...... Like Huffington Post.

Davesportscards · 10-14-2016, 07:00 AM

What I learned in this thread:
If it's from an article that is attacking Trump it must be true.
If it's from an article discrediting above article it's false.
If it it's an article exposing Clinton for the liar she is it needs to be ignored.

I wonder if The Onion were to run a bunch articles attacking Trump how many liberals would eat it up.

oldgoldy97 · 10-14-2016, 07:06 AM

Some more breaking articles. Posted online so it must be true!

Trump speaks about his worst enemy

oldgoldy97 · 10-14-2016, 07:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Davesportscards

What I learned in this thread:
If it's from an article that is defending Trump it must be true.
If it's from an article discrediting above article it's false.
If it it's an article exposing Trump for the liar he is it needs to be ignored.

I wonder if The Onion were to run a bunch articles attacking Clinton how many extremists would eat it up.

This is how it works, right?

ssbledsoe · 10-14-2016, 07:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Davesportscards

What I learned in this thread:
If it's from an article that is attacking Trump it must be true.
If it's from an article discrediting above article it's false.
If it it's an article exposing Clinton for the liar she is it needs to be ignored.

I wonder if The Onion were to run a bunch articles attacking Trump how many liberals would eat it up.

Isn't that what Facebook memes are for???

Davesportscards · 10-14-2016, 07:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ssbledsoe

Isn't that what Facebook memes are for???

View Poll Results: 2016 Election
Hillary Clinton	81	19.19%
Donald Trump	188	44.55%
Neither	153	36.26%
Voters: 422. You may not vote on this poll

10-14-2016, 05:07 AM	#8640
pac213up Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 8,268	I am just curious to see what happens to the Republican Party after this election. You lose to Hillary Clinton after 2 beatdowns from Obama. Will they adjust the platform to account for demographic shifts or are they going to continue down this path and give themselves such a small margin of error in a national election. It is only going to get more difficult for them. __________________ "Show me a good loser and I'll show you a loser." - Red Auerbach

10-14-2016, 07:00 AM	#8646
Davesportscards Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: Michigan Posts: 10,837	What I learned in this thread: If it's from an article that is attacking Trump it must be true. If it's from an article discrediting above article it's false. If it it's an article exposing Clinton for the liar she is it needs to be ignored. I wonder if The Onion were to run a bunch articles attacking Trump how many liberals would eat it up. __________________ In search of 2017 Max Scherzer 1987 Red Refractor /5

10-14-2016, 07:06 AM	#8647
oldgoldy97 Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 52,937	Some more breaking articles. Posted online so it must be true! Trump speaks about his worst enemy __________________ Truly riveting discussion: that’s what your wife/girlfriend/sheep said.

10-13-2016, 11:51 PM	#8632
coltsnsox07 Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Posts: 22,433	There's an article on MSN '14 Photos of U.S. Presidents Before And After The White House', I wonder if JFK is in there..

10-14-2016, 04:53 AM	#8639
babyfaceposey Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Pensacola, Florida Posts: 8,332 Babyfaceposey	Sorry meant to post this last night. BUSTED: @NYTimes Trump Accuser #RachelCrooks Is LYING According To Family Friend - GotNews