![]() |
|
|
#6326 |
|
Member
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6327 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
I had heard the same thing, but this superfractor rule is proving to be rather questionable. A 2018 Sapphire superfractor of Pujols is currently on ebay, and I believe I’ve seen a 2018 Devers Sapphire super, as well. In both cases, the Sapphire features the same picture as the regular Topps and Topps Chrome cards. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6328 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
What about code on the bottom - is it any different? 100% know this card came out of a box of Sapphire, but I don’t have the TC Super to compare to. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6329 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
Code is different, and also TC will be card #201. He is card #340 in Sapphire. Congrats again if I haven’t already said it enough Peyton!!! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6330 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Chicago
Posts: 5,537
|
Yours has Sapphire product code. So strange. I thought the no repeat card supers in Sapphire was a known fact.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6331 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
This is definitely the Sapphire, and they are two separate cards. I was just speaking to the theory that there’s no Sapphire superfractors for Sapphires that share photos with regular Topps Chromes. That appears to be a bunk theory...which, going on a tangent, means there are around 400 Acuna Sapphires, rather than the 285 some some claim. I don’t know—this may need to explored more deeply (or maybe it already has been), and it’s a total tangent from the glory of your Vlad pull. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Last edited by eye4talent; 05-11-2020 at 09:03 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6332 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Chicago
Posts: 5,537
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6333 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
Thank you. I felt guilty for robbing a moment of glory from this pull. This card is the glowing object in that Pulp Fiction briefcase. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Last edited by eye4talent; 05-11-2020 at 09:11 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6334 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Chicago
Posts: 5,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6335 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 241
|
First Sapphire card I have ever owned...man are they ever stunning in person!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6336 |
|
Member
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6337 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,469
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6338 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,201
|
Happy to land this. I think these Update Refractors /250 have a lot of room to grow...
__________________
Wanted Dead or Alive! 1. 1997 Bowman's Best Jose Cruz, Jr Atomic Refractor Autograph 2. 1997 SPx Jose Cruz, Jr. Grand Finale /50 |
|
|
|
|
|
#6339 |
|
Member
|
Nice addition! And yes they do...
__________________
-IG: @nice_cardboard |
|
|
|
|
|
#6340 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 241
|
Will be interesting to see how Chrome Update refractors do vs the regular Chrome refractors. Chrome Update is #'d to 250 with the photo matching Topps Update while Chrome is non numbered but matches the NNO SP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6341 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,469
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6342 |
|
Member
|
Just got this in and it is my first 3D card. I have to say I'm impressed by the depth of space the 3d effect creates. Pictures definitely do not do them justice.
[/url]
__________________
Flickr (In Progress):https://www.flickr.com/photos/noleinjax/albums Looking for rare Jameis Winston rookies (Prizm White Sparkle, Gold Vinyl, etc), 1/1's and jersey #'d stuff. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6343 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,201
|
Topps did an amazing job on those 3D cards.
__________________
Wanted Dead or Alive! 1. 1997 Bowman's Best Jose Cruz, Jr Atomic Refractor Autograph 2. 1997 SPx Jose Cruz, Jr. Grand Finale /50 |
|
|
|
|
|
#6344 |
|
Member
|
Arrived yesterday
![]() Have also updated showcase to include this one and other recent adds https://www.psacard.com/psasetregist...gegallery/5833
__________________
Collecting Tony Perez cards, baseball rookies and Ohio State football rookies |
|
|
|
|
|
#6347 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,072
|
Thoughts on value? Condition should be a 10 on initial inspection.
![]() ![]() Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
|
#6349 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,072
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6350 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,469
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|