2016 Politics Thread - Enter At Your Own Risk - All Politics & Dumb Opinions Here

[NeedChapmans]

Originally Posted by cruiserdaddy7

Goldman Sachs Bans Employees from Donating to Trump

There is a good read for all the crooked Hillary fans. Clearly, the big banks like ole Hillary.

I love how they spent the time to detail their policy, when they could have just as easily said "Don't donate to Trump".

[cruiserdaddy7]

All the people in here now bashing our military spending.

Ever wonder why our planes are rarely shot down while flying thousands of missions?

Lower spending will equal lower efficiency.

The same liberals crying for less military will be the FIRST crying when something hits the homeland. No guns, no military. I get it, but I don't.

[Siberian13]

Originally Posted by cruiserdaddy7

All the people in here now bashing our military spending.

Ever wonder why our planes are rarely shot down while flying thousands of missions?

Lower spending will equal lower efficiency.

The same liberals crying for less military will be the FIRST crying when something hits the homeland. No guns, no military. I get it, but I don't.

What flying missions are you referring to? Are they needed?

[jarrodsalas]

Originally Posted by Siberian13

What flying missions are you referring to? Are the needed?

Um. That little war we are fighting right now in the middle east. Also, these jets don't sit idle for months waiting for something to happen.

[Astros19]

Originally Posted by GeechQuest

Renting in Austin, TX it is 100% required. You can't get an apartment/condo without it. They won't even give you your keys until you submit the policy.

That may be true but there are literally millions of renters across America who do not utilize renters insurance.
I'd bet there are more uninsured renters than there are insured renters.
Don't tell the dems that though or they'll force everyone to purchase renters insurance and force those responsible people like myself to help pay for it.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

[IndySportsCards]

[NeilCO]

Originally Posted by jarrodsalas

While I do agree with winning the race of being on top as far as military is concerned...check this stat out...crazy. That is ONE type of aircraft.

The Pentagon now plans to spend $391.2 billion on 2,443 aircraft, with each plane costing a staggering $160 million. When taking into account the cost of flying and maintaining the F-35 over the course of its life, the program could surpass a trillion dollars, according to the Government Accountability Office.

Is this a bipartisan issue, then? Do we all agree (except cd7) that there is room for some cutbacks on military spending?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[jarrodsalas]

Originally Posted by NeilCO

Is this a bipartisan issue, then? Do we all agree (except cd7) that there is room for some cutbacks on military spending?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I do think there is a lot of fat that could be trimmed and dollars could be spent more efficiently. I have no doubt spending is reckless just like with most of our government. The F35 is 165 billion over budget for gods sake. One. hundred. and. sixty-five. billion.

[Siberian13]

Originally Posted by jarrodsalas

Um. That little war we are fighting right now in the middle east. Also, these jets don't sit idle for months waiting for something to happen.

We are at war? Could of fooled me

[cruiserdaddy7]

Originally Posted by Siberian13

We are at war? Could of fooled me

Well..... I agree we should be doing more.

[jdandns]

Originally Posted by ssbledsoe

And yet, ladies and gentlemen, he wants to "expand" the ACA... He blames big pharma for buying off the GOP, but the candidate he's voting for has the most pharma donations: Clinton tops 2016 field in drug industry donations | TheHill

I mean, you can't make this stuff up. Keep thinking that "progressive platform" is what you're voting for. I'm sure she'll follow the platform and not the will of her donors

Expand it. Replace it. Whatever.
Beats anarchy.

[jdandns]

Originally Posted by cruiserdaddy7

The same liberals crying for less military will be the FIRST crying when something hits the homeland. No guns, no military. I get it, but I don't.

Normally, I'd be skeptical, but you do know crying.
I'll give it a second look.

[trixstar]

Trumps thoughts on cyber terrorism are so informative

[Davesportscards]

Originally Posted by trixstar

Trumps thoughts on cyber terrorism are so informative

Hillary is really good at cyber.

[Siberian13]

Originally Posted by cruiserdaddy7

Well..... I agree we should be doing more.

If we are at war, we definitely should be doing more. But who is the war against currently? I'm not trying to be a smartass or anything. That is a serious question. This thread is helping me learn both sides of arguments for things like this. This thread also brings me a few good laughs from time to time too.

[babyfaceposey]

Originally Posted by Davesportscards

Hillary is really good at cyber.

True. I heard she was hacking???? No maybe that was hacked. Hmmm I don't know.

[ssbledsoe]

Originally Posted by jdandns

Expand it. Replace it. Whatever.
Beats anarchy.

Very effusive and informative. I'd love to hear more

I see you have no response to Killary having double the pharma donations of any other candidate


And, for the Repubs: https://alibertarianfuture.com/2016-...on-than-trump/

So much for that, a vote for Gary is a vote for Hillary

[jdandns]

I don't think "effusive" means what you think it means.

Beyond that, "Killary"?
For real-ary?

As for big Pharma, they know to back the winner.
Doesn't mean they'll get anything out of it, just like those Wall Street guys who paid her all that money to make those speeches won't either. Bernie has moved her well to the Left, whether she wanted to go that far or not. She'll need that constituency's support not only in November, 2016, but in November 2020 as well.

Nice poll from May, by the way. Cutting edge stuff...

[Davesportscards]

Originally Posted by babyfaceposey

True. I heard she was hacking???? No maybe that was hacked. Hmmm I don't know.

Ha

[37Jetson]

Originally Posted by pac213up

Obamacare really is not what Obama wanted to begin with. Not sure if his actual plan would have been better or worse. The positive in all of it (I hope) is that at some point here Congress is going to have to step up and address the issue of Healthcare. It was a failing system before Obamacare and no one had the guts to really tackle the issue. I have a feeling when it is all said and done this will be a step back to take two steps forward type of thing. Unfortunately it may be many years before taking those steps forward as Congress is unable to really do anything meaningful with the current leadership in both parties.

You are a reasonable guy, how would you envision fixing this awful legislation? Do you really think that Congress is going to straighten it out when they are bought and paid for on both sides of the aisle?

[ssbledsoe]

Originally Posted by jdandns

I don't think "effusive" means what you think it means.

Beyond that, "Killary"?
For real-ary?

As for big Pharma, they know to back the winner.
Doesn't mean they'll get anything out of it, just like those Wall Street guys who paid her all that money to make those speeches won't either. Bernie has moved her well to the Left, whether she wanted to go that far or not. She'll need that constituency's support not only in November, 2016, but in November 2020 as well.

Nice poll from May, by the way. Cutting edge stuff...

It's ok if you don't get sarcasm. I'm well aware of the definition of effusive. It's kind of cute how you've clearly gotten a little irritated. Your post wasn't informative either, but you seemingly chose to ignore that part

You don't mind Drumpf do you? What's wrong with Killary? I don't care for either moron repping the big parties.

It's funny how you seem to think the dems aren't crooks and won't bow to their corporate masters. Cute. Kind of like an older puppy that doesn't understand how big it really is... Funny to watch it start to run, but then stumble and turn into a tumbling pile of ears, snout, and tail

I'd love to see something more relevant if you can find the time.

[jdandns]

Originally Posted by ssbledsoe

It's ok if you don't get sarcasm. I'm well aware of the definition of effusive. It's kind of cute how you've clearly gotten a little irritated. Your post wasn't informative either, but you seemingly chose to ignore that part

You don't mind Drumpf do you? What's wrong with Killary? I don't care for either moron repping the big parties.

It's funny how you seem to think the dems aren't crooks and won't bow to their corporate masters. Cute. Kind of like an older puppy that doesn't understand how big it really is... Funny to watch it start to run, but then stumble and turn into a tumbling pile of ears, snout, and tail

I'd love to see something more relevant if you can find the time.

I get sarcasm, but it helps if you tell me when you're using it and who towards.

I'm far from irritated, and rather amused from watching you go all over the map, aimlessly. Monster, bro? 5HE, bro? Jolt Cola, bro?

Drumpf is his father's real name, but I'm ambivalent to it. I'm not sure how it's an insult in any event. I'll bet his Alt-Right backers dig it, oi?
Killary, however, is just sill-ary. Do better. Do much, much better.

Wild one here, other middle-aged dudes, so watch out. I'll bet this fella don't even sort his cards out. He just keeps 'em in a big box, in different sized piles not even all facing the right way, with the different sports mixed up in there, too.

C'mon, man.
You like order as much as the next guy.
Admit it.
Vote Hillary.
No one will know.
No one will ever know.

[TheHeel]

Obama said knock you out.

[CrownCollector]

Originally Posted by TheHeel

Obama said knock you out.

Attachment 345894

What is - why Russia, China, Japan, and North Korea laugh at our country.

[jdandns]

Hey, there, outspoken members of Blowout's own "Is This Something, Please Let This Be Something Brigade", all of your planting may at last be bearing fruit. A candidate seeking to become the first female President is indeed in trouble with the law:

North Dakota police issue arrest warrant for Jill Stein - AOL

Ok, ok, so not exactly the one you want, but baby steps, amiright?