2005 Bowman Chrome A-Rod Throwback Autographs #94AR 1994 SF #1/1 - Page 13

californiakron · 02-02-2013, 09:19 PM

I would love to see the results of a psychological analysis of David Peters.......

death2redemptions · 02-02-2013, 09:21 PM

Dave Peters paid $1 for the card

BostonNut · 02-02-2013, 09:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by death2redemptions

Dave Peters paid $1 for the card

I think I've seen three or four of these "error" A-Rod cards in the $1.00 bin at my LCS...

davepeters239 · 02-02-2013, 09:24 PM

What is wrong with some of you?

VWBUS1978 · 02-02-2013, 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BostonNut

I think I've seen three or four of these "error" A-Rod cards in the $1.00 bin at my LCS...

Go f'n buy them for me so I can shut this clown up.

I'll pay you $20 to get them.

death2redemptions · 02-02-2013, 09:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by davepeters239

What is wrong with some of you?

This is a classic Imac question

mjbuchanan80 · 02-02-2013, 10:04 PM

Mr. Peters. I will be receiving an email sometime very soon that is going to cause a bit of embarrassment for you. My apologies, but you said we should go to the source and I did...

AlphaNOmega06 · 02-02-2013, 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by davepeters239

What is wrong with some of you?

Your ignorance

jlzinck · 02-02-2013, 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mjbuchanan80

Mr. Peters. I will be receiving an email sometime very soon that is going to cause a bit of embarrassment for you. My apologies, but you said we should go to the source and I did...

Now I'm subscribed

But if you showed Mr Bong Selling porno star a video of a Topps Employee sealing the card he would still not believe it.

Cuz you know BECKETT says it's a 1/1 Suoerfractor

davepeters239 · 02-02-2013, 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mjbuchanan80

Mr. Peters. I will be receiving an email sometime very soon that is going to cause a bit of embarrassment for you. My apologies, but you said we should go to the source and I did...

I am unsure what this means exactly but I have nothing to hide or be embarrassed about with this card.

If you contacted Topps and or Beckett I welcome you to post whatever they have to say.

thpozr · 02-02-2013, 11:21 PM

I'm not quite sure what the big deal is on this card. I've got the same one. How do I know mine isn't a 1/1 of some sort? Not trying to be rude or anything, I just don't understand why yours is different than mine.

Sorry for the crappy scans. I was too lazy to get up and go to my scanner.

screamingdc · 02-02-2013, 11:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thpozr

I'm not quite sure what the big deal is on this card. I've got the same one. How do I know mine isn't a 1/1 of some sort? Not trying to be rude or anything, I just don't understand why yours is different than mine.

Sorry for the crappy scans. I was too lazy to get up and go to my scanner.

but yours isn't the autograph version. so dave must be right!

davepeters239 · 02-02-2013, 11:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thpozr

I'm not quite sure what the big deal is on this card. I've got the same one. How do I know mine isn't a 1/1 of some sort? Not trying to be rude or anything, I just don't understand why yours is different than mine.

Sorry for the crappy scans. I was too lazy to get up and go to my scanner.

i am unsure what that card is but I think it is the non autographed version.

The autograph version has a like clear spot down towards his glove and where his feet are on mine. That is where he would have signed it I guess.

Then on the back of the card there is a little square and a little triangle that says valid without sticker. This is where a serial numbered square sticker would go a 1/1 triangle sticker.

If you ever do get a chance for a better scan I would like to see the back of yours to compare to mine.

Oh also above the Bowman logo on the front thats hard to see in my scan it says autograph issue.

luck15hope · 02-02-2013, 11:58 PM

. . . . . . .

Mrpokey · 02-03-2013, 12:04 AM

I'd be interested in any new info

Quote:

Originally Posted by luck15hope

I have some insight into this situation if anybody, mainly davepeters, would like to see it. Please repsond that you would like to see it and I will do so. It may take me a few minutes to include everything that I would like to include so be patient.

luck15hope · 02-03-2013, 12:08 AM

. . . . . . .

davepeters239 · 02-03-2013, 12:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by luck15hope

OK, Thank you. I think it will clear a few things up and at least lead you all into the mind of Dave Peters. First and foremost, does everybody agree that this Checklist listed in the Beckett magazine is completely accurate pertaining to the print run of the cards?

That looks to be a Beckett price guide and I guess it is accurate. It shows the 94 card which is limited to 1 and it doesn't mention it as a superfractor.

dbackschamp2001 · 02-03-2013, 12:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by luck15hope

OK, Thank you. I think it will clear a few things up and at least lead you all into the mind of Dave Peters. First and foremost, does everybody agree that this Checklist listed in the Beckett magazine is completely accurate pertaining to the print run of the cards?

You know everyone agrees that is the checklist from Beckett.

luck15hope · 02-03-2013, 12:19 AM

. . . . . . .

VWBUS1978 · 02-03-2013, 12:25 AM

It does say all cards are refractors. The ops card is just chrome

luck15hope · 02-03-2013, 12:27 AM

. . . . . . .

babyfaceposey · 02-03-2013, 12:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by luck15hope

I will get to all of that soon. We have to take it step by step, so that there is a CLEAR understanding of these particular cards. Can we agree that BOTH checklists are 100% accurate pertaining to the print run of these cards?

Yes. Checklists are good. Next step please.

uberfatty · 02-03-2013, 12:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by luck15hope

I will get to all of that soon. We have to take it step by step, so that there is a CLEAR understanding of these particular cards. Can we agree that BOTH checklists are 100% accurate pertaining to the print run of these cards?

yes. It's late let's get cracking here.

davepeters239 · 02-03-2013, 12:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by luck15hope

You are correct sir. So then you will agree that this checklist is also correct as well (minus your opinion on the "SF" part), correct? Also notice that this checklist lists the cards as being CH, RF, and XF as well. Can we agree on this as well?

2005 Bowman Chrome Baseball Box - Complete Set Checklist (bottom of page)

2005 Bowman Chrome Baseball - A-Rod Throwback Exclusives Checklist
Base Cards - 4 Per Box
Parallel Cards: Refractor #/499 - X-Fractor #/99
- SuperFractors #1/1 -

A-Rod Throwback Base #94AR 1994
A-Rod Throwback Base #95AR 1995
A-Rod Throwback Base #96AR 1996
A-Rod Throwback Base #97AR 1997

Autograph Parallel Cards
- All Cards Are Refractors - Print Run Shown Below -

A-Rod Throwback Autographs #94AR 1994 SF #1/1
A-Rod Throwback Autographs #95AR 1995 XF #/25
A-Rod Throwback Autographs #96AR 1996 RF #/50
A-Rod Throwback Autographs #97AR 1997 CH #/99

i am unsure this checklist is accurate because it says All Cards Except Alex Rodriguez Throwbacks Are Found in These Parallels and am unsure if that part is accurate?

luck15hope · 02-03-2013, 12:32 AM

. . . . . . .

02-02-2013, 11:21 PM	#311
thpozr Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Location: Western Kansas Posts: 337 duncanmerchandise	I'm not quite sure what the big deal is on this card. I've got the same one. How do I know mine isn't a 1/1 of some sort? Not trying to be rude or anything, I just don't understand why yours is different than mine. Sorry for the crappy scans. I was too lazy to get up and go to my scanner. __________________ Just living life

02-02-2013, 11:58 PM	#314
luck15hope Banned Join Date: Nov 2011 Posts: 1,070	. . . . . . . Last edited by luck15hope; 02-12-2013 at 08:25 PM.

02-03-2013, 12:08 AM	#316
luck15hope Banned Join Date: Nov 2011 Posts: 1,070	. . . . . . . Last edited by luck15hope; 02-12-2013 at 08:26 PM.

02-03-2013, 12:19 AM	#319
luck15hope Banned Join Date: Nov 2011 Posts: 1,070	. . . . . . . Last edited by luck15hope; 02-12-2013 at 08:26 PM.

02-03-2013, 12:25 AM	#320
VWBUS1978 Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: SOUTH JERSEY Posts: 5,820 Vwbus1978 Vwbus1978	It does say all cards are refractors. The ops card is just chrome __________________ the fact that we exist, in a universe of sheer randomness, is scientific proof that there are aliens. we are the aliens. i can say that with 100% accuracy.

02-02-2013, 09:19 PM	#301
californiakron Member Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: NorCal Posts: 957	I would love to see the results of a psychological analysis of David Peters.......

02-02-2013, 09:21 PM	#302
death2redemptions Banned Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Creeping in mama's cellar Posts: 59,303 ddavisaz	Dave Peters paid $1 for the card

02-02-2013, 09:24 PM	#304
davepeters239 Banned Join Date: Aug 2011 Posts: 455	What is wrong with some of you?

02-02-2013, 10:04 PM	#307
mjbuchanan80 Member Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: Ocala FL Posts: 378 mjbuchanan80	Mr. Peters. I will be receiving an email sometime very soon that is going to cause a bit of embarrassment for you. My apologies, but you said we should go to the source and I did...

02-03-2013, 12:27 AM	#321
luck15hope Banned Join Date: Nov 2011 Posts: 1,070	. . . . . . . Last edited by luck15hope; 02-12-2013 at 08:26 PM.

02-03-2013, 12:32 AM	#325
luck15hope Banned Join Date: Nov 2011 Posts: 1,070	. . . . . . . Last edited by luck15hope; 02-12-2013 at 08:26 PM.