2020 Politics Thread - Enter At Your Own Risk - RULES IN OP

[rman112]

Originally Posted by Lonewolf

You can't lie without intent, which I did not have. Why would I purposefully provide the name, article, link AND disclaimer in my later post that it had not been confirmed yet, as I thought it had been?

Can we use that with Trump now?

[rman112]

Originally Posted by Lonewolf

Yes, the lying and deceit is typical with Trump and his administration.

Oh well. Guess not.

[rman112]

Originally Posted by techtre2003

Biden - June 30
"I’ve been tested and I’m constantly tested,” he says. "All you’ve got to do is watch me, and I can hardly wait to compare my cognitive capability to the cognitive capability of the man I’m running against."


Biden - August 5
"No, I haven't taken a test. Why the hell would I take a test? C'mon man. That's like saying you, before you got in this program, if you take a test where you're taking cocaine or not, what do you think huh? Are you a junkie?"

Well, to be fair.. "He doesn't remember" is a valid reason.

[Jopeal]

Originally Posted by mike1498

He has no reason do defend me. Unlike you I’ve challenged my own party (he’s Canadian but would most likely be conservative in America) on multiple occasions. The difference is although we disagree I can at least defend my point and so can he.

What point do I need to defend? And to whom do I need to defend myself to now?

Yeah, I needle people in this thread because the thread itself is funny to me.
I'm trying to tone it down a bit since Frenzy's request, but you guys tee me up too often.

I've blankly stated that I'm here posting to observe the responses and mental/emotional biases of political conservatives.
*This is not a joke*

[rman112]

Originally Posted by Jopeal

I should sincerely hope so. I'm glad you are holding the President to a higher standard than posters on a card forum Jerm.

Not just a poster. One with the HIGHEST of understandings.

[mike1498]

Originally Posted by Jopeal

What point do I need to defend? And to whom do I need to defend myself to now?

Yeah, I needle people in this thread because the thread itself is funny to me.
I'm trying to tone it down a bit since Frenzy's request, but you guys tee me up too often.

I've blankly stated that I'm here posting to observe the responses and mental/emotional biases of political conservatives.
*This is not a joke*

What was unreasonable?

You say Trump doesn’t understand the constitution while you went on for five pages trying to understand the electoral college? Can dems only be protected when they go on the attack? See all you really have on me is the fact I’m 19. I can’t even give you the Covid/systemic racism blog thing cause I asked you to elaborate on the authors statement and you couldn’t. If you actually had an answer you would’ve proved that you knew what you read. Imagine if all I had to do in college is send stupid blogs to my teacher to show my understanding

[jdandns]

Originally Posted by tpeichel34

Anyone that followed Q rather than the MSM has been much better informed.

Originally Posted by tpeichel34

Still living in the Trump as Russian Agent fairy tale? 300 dead Russians and knowing that President Trump isn’t a pushover is more likely the reason that Russia is behaving.

Still pushing this nonsense, huh?
What are the names of these dead Russians?

[tpeichel34]

Originally Posted by TheFrenzy

He certainly had that grassroots populist support.

Setting aside Trump's personality and ideology, maybe you would agree with me that this presidency has really revealed just how much presidents depend on all the hundreds of other administration staffers.

My takeaway at this point is that upending the establishment is ultimately going to take more than a single extravagant personality (whether you think that personality is extravagantly good or bad) to do it. It's going to take an outsider with an established network of capable people so that they don't sweep into the White House following Election Night and immediately find themselves saddled with the standard DNC or GOP staffers.

Put another way, maybe Trump has or has not "drained the swamp"—but we might agree that there just isn't enough "clean water" at the present to take the place of all the mud and crud that has built up.

You are absolutely correct. The swamp in DC is massive. President Trump had no option but to work with swamp creatures.

I think that we are going to find out that the Trump Administration did appoint and keep some people in place on purpose to gather evidence on illegal activities, then flip people to go after bigger fish.

[rman112]

Originally Posted by hairysasquatch

@Lonewolf: are you a junkie?

Headline if Trump said that:

'Trump: Black people are junkies'

[Clark]

Originally Posted by Jopeal

The second a 19-year old decides to change me on his own misperception, you jump on the bandwagon Clark. Yet two posts previous you thanked me for my response.

I don't jump on bandwagons.

Yes I thanked you and Frenzy for providing some direction on Gabby. You did not provide opinion on whether her position was right or wrong. My stating that I will do some research is hardly an endorsement.

[rman112]

Originally Posted by Clark

I don't jump on bandwagons.

Yes I thanked you and Frenzy for providing some direction on Gabby. You did not provide opinion on whether her position was right or wrong. Stating that I will do some research is hardly an endorsement.

Welcome to Jopealville.

[hairysasquatch]

Originally Posted by rman112

Headline if Trump said that:

'Trump: Black people are junkies'

Biden racking em up today!

[tpeichel34]

Originally Posted by jdandns

Still pushing this nonsense, huh?
What are the names of these dead Russians?

Russians and the US State Department have both confirmed the battle. I guess MSNBC hasn't been keeping you up to date?

[rman112]

Originally Posted by hairysasquatch

Biden racking em up today!

It took me too long to realize the irony of saying "Why the hell would I take a (cognitive) test?", after saying in June that he's been "Constantly tested".

I need some coffee. BRB.

[TheHeel]

Why are Republicans working to get Kanye on the Wisconsin ballot?

Hmmmm

[mike1498]

Originally Posted by TheHeel

Why are Republicans working to get Kanye on the Wisconsin ballot?

Hmmmm

Probably the same 10k people who voted for harmbe

[Onions]

Originally Posted by jdandns

Still pushing this nonsense, huh?
What are the names of these dead Russians?

Vladimir

[blackbears86]

Originally Posted by tpeichel34

Russians and the US State Department have both confirmed the battle. I guess MSNBC hasn't been keeping you up to date?

Not sure why you keep hanging on this "battle" tpeichel.


Yes, the US kicked some russian "paramilitary" ass---which I personally love.


Saying trump was responsible/authorized/knew about this? Seriously?---the guy was probably asleep or golfing. He likely heard about it 18 hours after it actually happened in one of his famous intelligence "briefings"


Let's give the props to the REAL person who authorized the counter strike during the skirmish, likely someone on the front lines.

[jdandns]

Originally Posted by Siberian13

The one annoying thing about these masks is they have become the new cigarette butt. I see hundreds of them on the ground daily. Stop being lazy pieces of crap people. Dispose of them properly.

Maybe they can somehow make them out of that Fruit Roll-up material so we can just eat them when we're done wearing them.

Originally Posted by pingbling23

Interesting angle. I can’t be critical on what I haven’t seen. I would tell President Trump the same thing if he was spreading false information in this thread.

Due to his continual use of hate speech, the over/under for Trump getting banned from this Forum would be around 25 posts.
He's also the kind who would do a couple of trades and not fulfill his end of the bargain.
Bottom line: Yosemite Don might last a week here, tops.

Originally Posted by Clark

I have seen Rogans interview with Yang and thought it was positive. I like what Gabbard said in this interview. What was the turning her back controversy?

Gabbard wouldn't vote for Trump's impeachment (she voted "present" instead). In addition, her candidacy was hyped by known Russian bots, which led some to believe that she may be a Russian asset like Trump himself is.

[blackbears86]

here's a good article regarding the details of the skirmish that occurred




https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/24/w...ies-syria.html

[tpeichel34]

Originally Posted by blackbears86

Not sure why you keep hanging on this "battle" tpeichel.


Yes, the US kicked some russian "paramilitary" ass---which I personally love.


Saying trump was responsible/authorized/knew about this? Seriously?---the guy was probably asleep or golfing. He likely heard about it 18 hours after it actually happened in one of his famous intelligence "briefings"


Let's give the props to the REAL person who authorized the counter strike during the skirmish, likely someone on the front lines.

The COC would have to delegate the authority for that type of response, which is how it should be. And if the 40 American Marines fighting the Russians had been slaughtered instead of the Russians, President Trump would have been crucified by the MSM, so he gets credit for the victory too. Think about it, the owner of the Super Bowl champion is the first one to raise the trophy even though the coaches and players were making the on field decisions.

On the other hand, I think there’s no way General Suleimani gets taken out without the President’s approval.

[tpeichel34]

Originally Posted by jdandns

Maybe they can somehow make them out of that Fruit Roll-up material so we can just eat them when we're done wearing them.




Due to his continual use of hate speech, the over/under for Trump getting banned from this Forum would be around 25 posts.
He's also the kind who would do a couple of trades and not fulfill his end of the bargain.
Bottom line: Yosemite Don might last a week here, tops.




Gabbard wouldn't vote for Trump's impeachment (she voted "present" instead). In addition, her candidacy was hyped by known Russian bots, which led some to believe that she may be a Russian asset like Trump himself is.

Mueller and his army of investigators couldn’t find any evidence of Russian Collusion, the IC had the most intrusive spying technology trained on everyone in Trumps Administration but they came up with nothing and the Steel Dossier was a farce. They were so empty handed that they resorted to the BS Ukrainian call to try and impeach him.

How can anyone still possibly believe that Trump is a Russian asset? Has the MSM brainwashed you that thoroughly?

[blackbears86]

Originally Posted by tpeichel34

The COC would have to delegate the authority for that type of response, which is how it should be. And if the 40 American Marines fighting the Russians had been slaughtered instead of the Russians, President Trump would have been crucified by the MSM, so he gets credit for the victory too. Think about it, the owner of the Super Bowl champion is the first one to raise the trophy even though the coaches and players were making the on field decisions.

On the other hand, I think there’s no way General Suleimani gets taken out without the President’s approval.

Correct me if I'm wrong---hillary is the one who got the lion's share of blame for Benghazi (which she should have) not Obama




I stand by what I said. The guy who should get credit is Jim Mattis who gave permission for the airstrikes on the russian paramilitary force. trump was likely clueless about the whole thing.






I do agree with you on Suleimani----trump likely signed off on that.

[Jopeal]

Originally Posted by mike1498

What was unreasonable?

You say Trump doesn’t understand the constitution while you went on for five pages trying to understand the electoral college? Can dems only be protected when they go on the attack? See all you really have on me is the fact I’m 19. I can’t even give you the Covid/systemic racism blog thing cause I asked you to elaborate on the authors statement and you couldn’t. If you actually had an answer you would’ve proved that you knew what you read. Imagine if all I had to do in college is send stupid blogs to my teacher to show my understanding

Do you believe undergraduate studies are difficult?

Frenzy did not like me using a wikipedia link partially because he knows that one can easily get by with using source links from Wikipedia to build a bibliography on an undergrad paper and rarely would a professor be any the wiser.

Your age is irrelevant to your misunderstanding of the premise of the article, but it is good fodder for pot shots.

You seem to still be misunderstanding the overarching reason for my posts here, despite me laying out my plain-as-day motivation in my last post and at other times previously.

This is fascinating stuff. Please continue to respond. I'm learning a lot.

[JeremyNick]

Originally Posted by rman112

Not just a poster. One with the HIGHEST of understandings.

The best poster. Just an amazing poster.