2005 Bowman Chrome A-Rod Throwback Autographs #94AR 1994 SF #1/1 - Page 12

bulljh · 02-02-2013, 05:47 PM

Where is this "proof" that the card in question was in Beckett?

davepeters239 · 02-02-2013, 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bulljh

Where is this "proof" that the card in question was in Beckett?

It was in the readers writes section of the December 2005 Baseball Beckett.

bulljh · 02-02-2013, 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by davepeters239

It was in the readers writes section of the December 2005 Baseball Beckett.

Show us....

mjbuchanan80 · 02-02-2013, 06:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by davepeters239

So let me understand this.

You think I am wrong and this is not a 1/1 card?

You think Beckett and BGS are wrong and it is not a 1/1 card?

You think Beckett is wrong and it is not a 1/1 card?

Now how is it that the person who owns the card, the company who made the card and the company who grades cards are all wrong about this?

I have proved time and time again in this thread what card it is.

1. Yes (based on no 1/1 stamp and no mention of a non-superfractor 1/1 in the checklist)

2. Yes (Nothing about this card should have prompted them to label it a Superfractor (SF) or a 1/1 (/1)).

3. Didn't you just ask this in #2?

4. Now how is it that the person who owns the card (delusional, crazy, stubborn, I dunno...)
the company who made the card (They have not said you are holding a 1/1 at all...nothing even close)
and the company who grades cards (They mislabeled it)

With Topps making no mention at all that you have some error 1/1 card, that leaves Beckett mislabeling and you running with it. I blame Beckett in all this really.

And just to throw this out there. If I send in a 1/100 Arod to Beckett and some guy there typos it and labels it 1/10 - it doesn't mean I magically have a 1/10.

death2redemptions · 02-02-2013, 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by davepeters239

It was in the readers writes section of the December 2005 Baseball Beckett.

Prove it and if you can't please never post here again Mr. scam artist

AlphaNOmega06 · 02-02-2013, 06:09 PM

Dave Peters your in the running for Idiot of the Year 2013.

death2redemptions · 02-02-2013, 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AlphaNOmega06

Dave Peters your in the running for Idiot of the Year 2013.

He is contending with IMac but I think Dave Peters may win if he continues to keep posting

MetDude · 02-02-2013, 06:22 PM

A man had just moved from his big apartment in NYC, to a big farm way out in the country side.
Just days after he moved, he realized he was out of chicken feed, so he went down to the nearest store. (a good 2-hour drive away). "Can I get me some chicken feed?" the man asked. "Yup, but ya can't have none unless you can prove to me you actually got chickens. Don't want no one eatin' it or nothin' an' gettin' sick," the clerk responded. He argued with her a bit, but finally gave in and took a two hour drive back and forth once again, this time with the chicken. "Here's my chicken. Now get me the chicken feed." He got his feed and drove home.
The next day he ran out of dog food for his dog. Once again, he drove down to the store, foolishly not thinking about bringing his dog. It was the same case. He had to present his dog to the stubborn clerk. He went back home and retrieved his dog, and got his dog food.
The next day, he went down to the store again, this time with a shoe box with a lid on it that had a hole in the top. He walked into the store and said to the clerk, "Smell this."
"That smells like... crap!" she said with a look of surprise on her face. "Oh... toilet paper."

MetDude · 02-02-2013, 06:26 PM

“Stubborn and ardent clinging to one's opinion is the best proof of stupidity”
Michel de Montaigne quotes (French Philosopher and Writer. 1533-1592)

VWBUS1978 · 02-02-2013, 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MetDude

“Stubborn and ardent clinging to one's opinion is the best proof of stupidity”
Michel de Montaigne quotes (French Philosopher and Writer. 1533-1592)

The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over expecting different results. - Albert Einstein

MetDude · 02-02-2013, 06:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VWBUS1978

The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over expecting different results. - Albert Einstein

Quote:

Originally Posted by VWBUS1978

The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over expecting different results. - Albert Einstein

Quote:

Originally Posted by VWBUS1978

The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over expecting different results. - Albert Einstein

Quote:

Originally Posted by VWBUS1978

The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over expecting different results. - Albert Einstein

Quote:

Originally Posted by VWBUS1978

The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over expecting different results. - Albert Einstein

Quote:

Originally Posted by VWBUS1978

The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over expecting different results. - Albert Einstein

Quote:

Originally Posted by VWBUS1978

The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over expecting different results. - Albert Einstein

Quote:

Originally Posted by VWBUS1978

The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over expecting different results. - Albert Einstein

"D'oh!" - Homer Simpson

WilsonValdez · 02-02-2013, 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AlphaNOmega06

Dave Peters your in the running for Idiot of the Year 2013.

Everyone who has posted in this thread is in the running for idiot of the year. I can't believe some people allow themselves so easily to get suckered in by David's willful ignorance trolling.

davepeters239 · 02-02-2013, 08:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mjbuchanan80

1. Yes (based on no 1/1 stamp and no mention of a non-superfractor 1/1 in the checklist)

2. Yes (Nothing about this card should have prompted them to label it a Superfractor (SF) or a 1/1 (/1)).

3. Didn't you just ask this in #2?

4. Now how is it that the person who owns the card (delusional, crazy, stubborn, I dunno...)
the company who made the card (They have not said you are holding a 1/1 at all...nothing even close)
and the company who grades cards (They mislabeled it)

With Topps making no mention at all that you have some error 1/1 card, that leaves Beckett mislabeling and you running with it. I blame Beckett in all this really.

And just to throw this out there. If I send in a 1/100 Arod to Beckett and some guy there typos it and labels it 1/10 - it doesn't mean I magically have a 1/10.

Maybe I am explaining it wrong?

I will try one more time the best I can because I really want everyone to understand.

This card is from 2005 and there would be no foil machine numbered 1/1 stamp on it designating it a 1/1. Instead it would have had a triangle hologram sticker affixed to the back of the card with a 1/1 printed on the hologram sticker.

As I have repeatedly said over and over in this thread it is not a superfractor and there was no superfractor made for the autograph throwback version. There may be a superfractor card for the non autographed version but I cannot say.

I have also repeatedly said that the SF they have listed in a lot of the checklists online was simply a typo. I don't know what happened or why it was listed like that but it was an obvious mistake and I really am not understanding why people are having such a hard time grasping this. Has there never been a mistake or typo in a checklist before?

I am very stubborn on this because I know I am right. Topps doesn't have to say its a 1/1 because again it is what it is. The card is a 2005 Bowman Chrome A-Rod Throwback Autographs 94A-AR card and the odds to pull it were 1:614,088 packs. There was only one of these cards inserted into the product.

Also I think you are mistaken in saying that Beckett made an error with numbering as they did not. Again the only error in the checklist is the SF designation and not the /1 part.

Again all this can be verified with Topps and with Beckett if you choose to contact them and ask. This can also be verified by anyone at any time just by going to the Beckett website and looking up the population report and also looking up the serial number right off the BGS case.

Card Serial Number: 0004133288

Set Name : 2005 Bowman Chrome A-Rod Throwback Autographs
Player Name : A.Rodriguez 1994 SF/1
Date Graded : Tuesday, February 28, 2006
Centering Grade : 9.5
Corner Grade : 9.5
Edges Grade : 9.5
Surfaces Grade : 8.5
Autograph Grade : Not Available
Final Grade : 9.0

natbornkiller · 02-02-2013, 08:51 PM

VWBUS1978 · 02-02-2013, 09:02 PM

This whole thread reminds me of something my grandfather used to tell me:

"Never trust anyone with two first names"

californiakron · 02-02-2013, 09:03 PM

So let me get this straight. You're saying Beckett messed up in the population report by having the "SF" designation listed by this card. You're basically admitting that Beckett has the card listed incorrectly.........yet you're sure the /1 part is correct???????

Did you not create this thread with the SF in your title??? Wrong and wrong and wrong and wrong and wrong again.......................

You sir are a complete and utter genius!!!!!!!!!!!!!

CAN A MOD PLEASE MAKE THIS THREAD GO POOF ALREADY????

death2redemptions · 02-02-2013, 09:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by davepeters239

Maybe I am explaining it wrong?

I will try one more time the best I can because I really want everyone to understand.

We all understand you are a moron, everything you say is irrelevant. You believe your right which means you must be right and you will ignore any logical response saying otherwise. I am starting to believe you are slightly retarded

davepeters239 · 02-02-2013, 09:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by californiakron

So let me get this straight. You're saying Beckett messed up in the population report by having the "SF" designation listed by this card. You're basically admitting that Beckett has the card listed incorrectly.........yet you're sure the /1 part is correct???????

Did you not create this thread with the SF in your title??? Wrong and wrong and wrong and wrong and wrong again.......................

You sir are a complete and utter genius!!!!!!!!!!!!!

CAN A MOD PLEASE MAKE THIS THREAD GO POOF ALREADY????

Asked and answered in previous posts.

death2redemptions · 02-02-2013, 09:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by davepeters239

Asked and answered in previous posts.

It has been answered that you are a scam artist

VWBUS1978 · 02-02-2013, 09:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by davepeters239

Asked and answered in previous posts.

How much do you pay for the card?

davepeters239 · 02-02-2013, 09:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VWBUS1978

How much do you pay for the card?

Asked and answered in this thread.

VWBUS1978 · 02-02-2013, 09:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by davepeters239

Asked and answered in this thread.

No, it was not answered.

Saying "I'd rather not say" is not an answer.

davepeters239 · 02-02-2013, 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VWBUS1978

No, it was not answered.

Saying "I'd rather not say" is not an answer.

That is the answer I choose to give so I say again asked and answered.

VWBUS1978 · 02-02-2013, 09:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by davepeters239

That is the answer I choose to give so I say again asked and answered.

That's a clown answer, bro.

natbornkiller · 02-02-2013, 09:19 PM

02-02-2013, 06:22 PM	#283
MetDude Member Join Date: May 2011 Location: Brooklyn NY Posts: 4,751	A man had just moved from his big apartment in NYC, to a big farm way out in the country side. Just days after he moved, he realized he was out of chicken feed, so he went down to the nearest store. (a good 2-hour drive away). "Can I get me some chicken feed?" the man asked. "Yup, but ya can't have none unless you can prove to me you actually got chickens. Don't want no one eatin' it or nothin' an' gettin' sick," the clerk responded. He argued with her a bit, but finally gave in and took a two hour drive back and forth once again, this time with the chicken. "Here's my chicken. Now get me the chicken feed." He got his feed and drove home. The next day he ran out of dog food for his dog. Once again, he drove down to the store, foolishly not thinking about bringing his dog. It was the same case. He had to present his dog to the stubborn clerk. He went back home and retrieved his dog, and got his dog food. The next day, he went down to the store again, this time with a shoe box with a lid on it that had a hole in the top. He walked into the store and said to the clerk, "Smell this." "That smells like... crap!" she said with a look of surprise on her face. "Oh... toilet paper." __________________ 2008 Topps Chrome Red Refractor SET #'d/25 98.8% complete! NEED THESE 4 - PLEASE LMK!!! 55 Orlando Hudson,150 Homer Bailey,191 Edinson Volquez, MHRC536 Mantle HR #536

02-02-2013, 06:26 PM	#284
MetDude Member Join Date: May 2011 Location: Brooklyn NY Posts: 4,751	“Stubborn and ardent clinging to one's opinion is the best proof of stupidity” Michel de Montaigne quotes (French Philosopher and Writer. 1533-1592) __________________ 2008 Topps Chrome Red Refractor SET #'d/25 98.8% complete! NEED THESE 4 - PLEASE LMK!!! 55 Orlando Hudson,150 Homer Bailey,191 Edinson Volquez, MHRC536 Mantle HR #536

02-02-2013, 08:51 PM	#289
natbornkiller Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: bkNY Posts: 22,789	__________________ HAH HAH I STILL HAS THE RIGHT TO EDIT THIS !:eatit:

02-02-2013, 09:02 PM	#290
VWBUS1978 Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: SOUTH JERSEY Posts: 5,820 Vwbus1978 Vwbus1978	This whole thread reminds me of something my grandfather used to tell me: "Never trust anyone with two first names" __________________ the fact that we exist, in a universe of sheer randomness, is scientific proof that there are aliens. we are the aliens. i can say that with 100% accuracy.

02-02-2013, 09:19 PM	#300
natbornkiller Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: bkNY Posts: 22,789	__________________ HAH HAH I STILL HAS THE RIGHT TO EDIT THIS !:eatit:

02-02-2013, 05:47 PM	#276
bulljh Member Join Date: Nov 2011 Location: Sparks, NV Posts: 6,233 bulljh	Where is this "proof" that the card in question was in Beckett?

02-02-2013, 06:09 PM	#281
AlphaNOmega06 Member Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: Detroit, MI Posts: 383	Dave Peters your in the running for Idiot of the Year 2013.

02-02-2013, 09:03 PM	#291
californiakron Member Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: NorCal Posts: 957	So let me get this straight. You're saying Beckett messed up in the population report by having the "SF" designation listed by this card. You're basically admitting that Beckett has the card listed incorrectly.........yet you're sure the /1 part is correct??????? Did you not create this thread with the SF in your title??? Wrong and wrong and wrong and wrong and wrong again....................... You sir are a complete and utter genius!!!!!!!!!!!!! CAN A MOD PLEASE MAKE THIS THREAD GO POOF ALREADY????