2020 version of new vintage acquisitions - Page 10

irv · 05-18-2020, 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oplum29

honestly, i don't get how that was graded a one, that's insane.

i've seen 1's that were horrible, creased like crazy, corners are bad, etc, but these two look really good.

It's easy to see the horizontal creases on the Mays card but the Mantle is a lot tougher.
Either way, I think that is the best looking 53 Mantle "1" I have ever seen.

Great pick ups, Illustrious. Congrats.

dboll20 · 05-18-2020, 03:35 PM

Checked another one off of my Yankees vintage wish list - this one becomes the oldest card in the collection!

IMG_3209 by Dylan Boll, on Flickr

IMG_3210 by Dylan Boll, on Flickr

oplum29 · 05-18-2020, 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by irv

It's easy to see the horizontal creases on the Mays card but the Mantle is a lot tougher.
Either way, I think that is the best looking 53 Mantle "1" I have ever seen.

Great pick ups, Illustrious. Congrats.

yeah man, that Mantle looks too good to be a 1, unless the photo isn't showing certain defects, idk. that's crazy.

the way that card looks from the picture, it looks like a 4 at worst.

Illustrious · 05-19-2020, 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by irv

It's easy to see the horizontal creases on the Mays card but the Mantle is a lot tougher.
Either way, I think that is the best looking 53 Mantle "1" I have ever seen.

Great pick ups, Illustrious. Congrats.

Quote:

Originally Posted by oplum29

yeah man, that Mantle looks too good to be a 1, unless the photo isn't showing certain defects, idk. that's crazy.

the way that card looks from the picture, it looks like a 4 at worst.

Here's a different angle where the creases are apparent:

oplum29 · 05-19-2020, 01:52 PM

honestly, even then, at a 1, that's insanely pretty and still seems low. idk exactly how PSA grades vintage cards.

irv · 05-19-2020, 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oplum29

honestly, even then, at a 1, that's insanely pretty and still seems low. idk exactly how PSA grades vintage cards.

I've always believed/thought that SGC has graded tougher than PSA but I think, likely due to the scandal, PSA has toughened things up lately?

Maybe its always been any creases deem a card a 1, I'm not sure, and although I am not a fan of creases at all, I'd gladly purchase that Mick any day of the week.

VanLingoMungo46 · 05-19-2020, 02:57 PM

I realize there have been a million threads on the various grading companies, but put me in SGC's corner. I like their new slabs. I realize PSA carries maybe a slight premium in vintage, but maybe that gap is narrowing. I have bought mostly PSA and the differences between good PSA 4s and bad 4s is amazing.

As for the Mantle, it's a great looking card. You can see some amazing differences in cards graded poor. I saw a '57 Spahn at the last show I attended that was a '1' and it looked like a 7. Turned out it had a pinhole that you couldn't see without a microscope and I guess they have to give it a one. Not all 'poors' are created equal that's for sure and that's why you see such a tremendous variance in prices on them especially with highly sought after vintage cards.

VanLingoMungo46 · 05-19-2020, 03:43 PM

Here's a recent Goudey I picked up. Love the colors on this one. I only need 236 cards to complete this all-time great set....

VanLingoMungo46 · 05-19-2020, 03:46 PM

I got this card a couple of months ago on the Vintage Buy/Sell thread of this very forum. It might have been the best deal I have gotten on a card anywhere. The upper left has some scratches that indent but don't penetrate the surface. You can't see it at all, but the guy told me about it because he's a straight shooter. Anyway, I still can't believe I own this card. That yellow totally pops in the SGC holder IMO.

irv · 05-19-2020, 03:51 PM

Very nice cards, VLM46.

oplum29 · 05-19-2020, 03:58 PM

added the 1.5

so here's what they look like now:

the 1.5 has a better surface and corners, but a little off centered from top to bottom compared to the 1.

RW3FAN · 05-19-2020, 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Illustrious

Up until now, my oldest card was a '68 Topps Ryan rookie, but I've decided to completely switch my focus over to vintage, and these two are my first purchases:

Is the left side of that mantle trimmed?

oplum29 · 05-19-2020, 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RW3FAN

Is the left side of that mantle trimmed?

if it was, wouldn't PSA catch it?

oh wait...hahaha

hxcmilkshake · 05-19-2020, 06:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RW3FAN

Is the left side of that mantle trimmed?

I think its ok

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

vintg · 05-19-2020, 06:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VanLingoMungo46

I realize there have been a million threads on the various grading companies, but put me in SGC's corner. I like their new slabs. I realize PSA carries maybe a slight premium in vintage, but maybe that gap is narrowing. I have bought mostly PSA and the differences between good PSA 4s and bad 4s is amazing.

As for the Mantle, it's a great looking card. You can see some amazing differences in cards graded poor. I saw a '57 Spahn at the last show I attended that was a '1' and it looked like a 7. Turned out it had a pinhole that you couldn't see without a microscope and I guess they have to give it a one. Not all 'poors' are created equal that's for sure and that's why you see such a tremendous variance in prices on them especially with highly sought after vintage cards.

I agree.

give me an identical graded sgc at a lesser price, with better eye appeal
any day of the week.

I too, love the new holders, they make the card "pop" to me.

mchenrycards · 05-20-2020, 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vintg

I agree.

give me an identical graded sgc at a lesser price, with better eye appeal
any day of the week.

I too, love the new holders, they make the card "pop" to me.

I am in the SGC camp as well. I have found their grades to be a bit tighter than PSA but the prices they bring are much cheaper than PSA's which makes it great for a collector like me.

Here is my latest pick up which leaves me just 65 cards short of this set with Mantle being the only HOFer that I need.

shayscards79 · 05-20-2020, 04:21 PM

Just picked up this 55 Bowman Mays. Pretty sweet copy for an EX condition card.

oplum29 · 05-20-2020, 10:41 PM

that's a really nice Mays...wonder what he's looking at when they took the photo.

oplum29 · 05-22-2020, 02:19 AM

added a couple of Eddie Mathews cards

and then this Aaron 1957- reverse error card. really like the centering on it.

shayscards79 · 05-22-2020, 09:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oplum29

added a couple of Eddie Mathews cards

and then this Aaron 1957- reverse error card. really like the centering on it.

Nice Aaron. That's an uncorrected error right?

Bretsky · 05-22-2020, 10:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dboll20

Checked another one off of my Yankees vintage wish list - this one becomes the oldest card in the collection!

IMG_3209 by Dylan Boll, on Flickr

IMG_3210 by Dylan Boll, on Flickr

Great looking card!

oplum29 · 05-22-2020, 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shayscards79

Nice Aaron. That's an uncorrected error right?

yep, the reverse negative. funny how about 30 years later they did the same thing with a Brave but it was Dale Murphy in the Upper Deck set.

dboll20 · 05-28-2020, 09:08 AM

Couple new ones over the last week or so

IMG_3281 by Dylan Boll, on Flickr

VanLingoMungo46 · 05-28-2020, 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dboll20

Couple new ones over the last week or so

IMG_3281 by Dylan Boll, on Flickr

I really like that '54 Bowman Reese card and am poking around for one.

fulltritty · 05-28-2020, 12:38 PM

Picked these two up to fill in 2 year holes in my collection. I now have at least one card from every year 1949 - 2020.

05-19-2020, 01:52 PM	#230
oplum29 Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: Texas Posts: 10,405	honestly, even then, at a 1, that's insanely pretty and still seems low. idk exactly how PSA grades vintage cards. __________________ "got em, got em, need em, got em, got em, need em, got em" - Little Monsters

05-19-2020, 03:51 PM	#235
irv Member Join Date: Dec 2016 Location: Ontario, Canada. Posts: 1,035	Very nice cards, VLM46. __________________ My 52 Topps collection: https://www.flickr.com/photos/144160280@N05/

05-19-2020, 03:58 PM	#236
oplum29 Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: Texas Posts: 10,405	added the 1.5 so here's what they look like now: the 1.5 has a better surface and corners, but a little off centered from top to bottom compared to the 1. __________________ "got em, got em, need em, got em, got em, need em, got em" - Little Monsters

05-20-2020, 04:21 PM	#242
shayscards79 Member Join Date: Oct 2012 Location: San Diego Posts: 3,876 shayscards79	Just picked up this 55 Bowman Mays. Pretty sweet copy for an EX condition card. __________________ Cubs and Colts fan!!! Collecting all vintage stars... especially Ernie Banks Collecting any and all Indianapolis Colts cards

05-20-2020, 10:41 PM	#243
oplum29 Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: Texas Posts: 10,405	that's a really nice Mays...wonder what he's looking at when they took the photo. __________________ "got em, got em, need em, got em, got em, need em, got em" - Little Monsters

05-18-2020, 03:35 PM	#227
dboll20 Member Join Date: May 2013 Location: sinking spring, PA Posts: 2,601 yanksfandboll20	Checked another one off of my Yankees vintage wish list - this one becomes the oldest card in the collection! IMG_3209 by Dylan Boll, on Flickr IMG_3210 by Dylan Boll, on Flickr

05-19-2020, 02:57 PM	#232
VanLingoMungo46 Member Join Date: Aug 2019 Posts: 723	I realize there have been a million threads on the various grading companies, but put me in SGC's corner. I like their new slabs. I realize PSA carries maybe a slight premium in vintage, but maybe that gap is narrowing. I have bought mostly PSA and the differences between good PSA 4s and bad 4s is amazing. As for the Mantle, it's a great looking card. You can see some amazing differences in cards graded poor. I saw a '57 Spahn at the last show I attended that was a '1' and it looked like a 7. Turned out it had a pinhole that you couldn't see without a microscope and I guess they have to give it a one. Not all 'poors' are created equal that's for sure and that's why you see such a tremendous variance in prices on them especially with highly sought after vintage cards.

05-19-2020, 03:43 PM	#233
VanLingoMungo46 Member Join Date: Aug 2019 Posts: 723	Here's a recent Goudey I picked up. Love the colors on this one. I only need 236 cards to complete this all-time great set....

05-19-2020, 03:46 PM	#234
VanLingoMungo46 Member Join Date: Aug 2019 Posts: 723	I got this card a couple of months ago on the Vintage Buy/Sell thread of this very forum. It might have been the best deal I have gotten on a card anywhere. The upper left has some scratches that indent but don't penetrate the surface. You can't see it at all, but the guy told me about it because he's a straight shooter. Anyway, I still can't believe I own this card. That yellow totally pops in the SGC holder IMO.

05-22-2020, 02:19 AM	#244
oplum29 Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: Texas Posts: 10,405	added a couple of Eddie Mathews cards and then this Aaron 1957- reverse error card. really like the centering on it. __________________ "got em, got em, need em, got em, got em, need em, got em" - Little Monsters

05-28-2020, 09:08 AM	#248
dboll20 Member Join Date: May 2013 Location: sinking spring, PA Posts: 2,601 yanksfandboll20	Couple new ones over the last week or so IMG_3281 by Dylan Boll, on Flickr

05-28-2020, 12:38 PM	#250
fulltritty Member Join Date: Jun 2013 Location: King George, VA Posts: 81,171	Picked these two up to fill in 2 year holes in my collection. I now have at least one card from every year 1949 - 2020.