Blowout Cards Forums
AD Heritage

Go Back   Blowout Cards Forums > BLOWOUTS HOBBY TALK > HOCKEY

Notices

HOCKEY Post your Hockey Cards Hobby Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-02-2025, 06:03 PM   #1
ThatGuyPal
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 4,107
Default Top 25 Sets Of The Last 25 Years (According To Beckett)

1. 2005-06 The Cup
2. 2015-16 Upper Deck Tim Hortons (Not joking)
3. 2015-16 The Cup
4. 2001-02 SP Authentic
5. 2001-02 Private Stock Titanium
6. 2006 ITG Going For Gold Women's National Team
7. 2012-13 Fleer Retro
8. 2001-02 Between The Pipes
9. 2012-13 ITG Draft Prospects
10.2020-21 Regina Pats Team Set
11. 2001-02 UD Premier Collection
12. 2001-02 Fleer Greats Of The Game
13. 2003-04 Parkhurst Original Six
14. 2004-05 Upper Deck All-World Edition
15. 2017-18 Upper Deck Synergy
16. 2011-12 ITG Enforcers
17. 2008-09 Upper Deck Montreal Centennial
18. 2010-11 Score
19. 2007-08 In The Game O Canada
20. 2004-05 Upper Deck Legendary Signatures
21. 2004-05 ITG Heroes And Prospects
22. 2019-20 OPC Platinum
23. 2002-03 Upper Deck Artistic Impressions
24. 2000-01 Topps Heritage
25. 2001-02 Pacific Mcdonalds

Thoughts?
ThatGuyPal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2025, 07:08 PM   #2
slightlyrounded
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 230
Default

trash list...at least they got number 1 right.
slightlyrounded is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2025, 07:17 AM   #3
odjickfan
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,501
Default

UD Legends 2000-01 should have been on the list, the first year of ITG Ultimate too.
__________________
Tradelist: https://docs.google.com/document/d/11IdFTXBFFoAaX6H2aVivPkQ53Eh4XI5g/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=106577311251479576706&rtpof=true&sd=true
Wantlist: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1p25DD9-ZdSr5PobQTfdArgcqS3Ixon4x/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=106577311251479576706&rtpof=true&sd=true
odjickfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2025, 07:59 AM   #4
rizzeedizzee
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 339
Default

Some baffling inclusions, and exclusions. It's like they tried to be obscure in several instance just for the sake of doing so.
rizzeedizzee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2025, 12:35 PM   #5
ZappBrannigan
Member
 
ZappBrannigan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Biafra
Posts: 2,375
Default

I mean it's the state of the hobby. Nobody knows f'all anymore.
ZappBrannigan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2025, 04:58 PM   #6
rohara99
Member
 
rohara99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Canada, eh!
Posts: 985
Default

2001-02 Private Stock Titanium was a sick set!
rohara99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2025, 12:07 AM   #7
anusinha
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 13,661
Default

Nothing from Panini I see
anusinha is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2025, 01:31 AM   #8
TheVolta
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 4,997
Default

Is 2010-11 score only included because of the joke card?
__________________
NO STICKERS!
Cuts > Stickers… even if they’re alive
TheVolta is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2025, 02:03 AM   #9
ThatGuyPal
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 4,107
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheVolta View Post
Is 2010-11 score only included because of the joke card?
Taro? It's mentioned along with the fact it was a throwback to 90-91 "when everyone was collecting cards" and the 559-card base set being good for the next generation of set-builders and for being a complete representation of a critical hobby season.
ThatGuyPal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2025, 07:17 AM   #10
rizzeedizzee
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 339
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ThatGuyPal View Post
Taro? It's mentioned along with the fact it was a throwback to 90-91 "when everyone was collecting cards" and the 559-card base set being good for the next generation of set-builders and for being a complete representation of a critical hobby season.
If that's Beckett's explanation, then I am reminded of one of my favorite all time adages: Those who justify don't convince.
rizzeedizzee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2025, 08:08 AM   #11
Satan
Member
 
Satan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: NL
Posts: 620
Default

lmfao
Satan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2025, 09:57 AM   #12
creasecollector
Member
 
creasecollector's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,586
Default

Where was this list published? In their recent magazine issue?
__________________
Collecting: Jhonas Enroth
View my Collections, Traders & Wantlist: creasecollector.weebly.com
Co-Host of the Center Ice Card Cast - A Hockey Card Podcast
Instagram/Twitter: @creasecollector
creasecollector is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2025, 10:14 AM   #13
ThatGuyPal
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 4,107
Default

I mean as someone said it's like they tried to go obscure places so you're not gonna have much of an explanation. Personally I find it weird including the Regina Pats Team set which wasn't even pack-pulled just cause of Bedard, it's like because they put his YG in the top 25 rookies they didn't want to double up the same sets for this. Like why this over S2? People who don't watch hockey wanted S2, people who don't watch hockey likely don't know the Pats set exists.

Yeah it's the latest issue of Beckett.
ThatGuyPal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2025, 12:06 PM   #14
discostu
Member
 
discostu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 7,990
Default

2001-02 Fleer Greats Of The Game should be higher than 12 to me.
__________________
Every day I start to ooze.
discostu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2025, 01:53 PM   #15
DCUnited96
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 26
Default

The inclusion of 2010-11 Score probably falls in the Dallas area self-love category.

Al Muir and at least one other former writer left Beckett to head up Panini's entry in the hockey card market. They has a decent outlook on what hockey cards should be, including 2010-11 Score, the Pinnacle releases, and others. Their vision apparently did not match with the higher ups at Panini, as they were let go somewhere around year two. There were non-disclosure agreements, so the details will probably never be known.

Muir was rehired by Beckett later in the decade and is currently the Senior editor.

Last edited by DCUnited96; 04-04-2025 at 01:53 PM. Reason: grammar
DCUnited96 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2025, 08:01 PM   #16
odjickfan
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,501
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DCUnited96 View Post
The inclusion of 2010-11 Score probably falls in the Dallas area self-love category.

Al Muir and at least one other former writer left Beckett to head up Panini's entry in the hockey card market. They has a decent outlook on what hockey cards should be, including 2010-11 Score, the Pinnacle releases, and others. Their vision apparently did not match with the higher ups at Panini, as they were let go somewhere around year two. There were non-disclosure agreements, so the details will probably never be known.

Muir was rehired by Beckett later in the decade and is currently the Senior editor.
In my opinion, the line-up from Panini was average in their first couple of years. Things improved a lot with Classic Signatures in 12-13 and some great 13-14 products like Contenders, Prime and National Treasure.
__________________
Tradelist: https://docs.google.com/document/d/11IdFTXBFFoAaX6H2aVivPkQ53Eh4XI5g/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=106577311251479576706&rtpof=true&sd=true
Wantlist: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1p25DD9-ZdSr5PobQTfdArgcqS3Ixon4x/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=106577311251479576706&rtpof=true&sd=true
odjickfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2025, 08:53 PM   #17
ThatGuyPal
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 4,107
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DCUnited96 View Post
The inclusion of 2010-11 Score probably falls in the Dallas area self-love category.

Al Muir and at least one other former writer left Beckett to head up Panini's entry in the hockey card market. They has a decent outlook on what hockey cards should be, including 2010-11 Score, the Pinnacle releases, and others. Their vision apparently did not match with the higher ups at Panini, as they were let go somewhere around year two. There were non-disclosure agreements, so the details will probably never be known.

Muir was rehired by Beckett later in the decade and is currently the Senior editor.
Cool info never knew that
ThatGuyPal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2025, 03:40 AM   #18
Seahawks fan
Member
 
Seahawks fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 7,876
Default

I'm surprised 20/21 SP Signature Legends didn't make the cut. It sold out pretty fast and was well loved/holds value.
__________________
Always looking for Kam Chancellor and Rare Marcus Trufant cards. I will buy or trade just message me.
Seahawks fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2025, 03:09 PM   #19
DCUnited96
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 26
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by odjickfan View Post
In my opinion, the line-up from Panini was average in their first couple of years. Things improved a lot with Classic Signatures in 12-13 and some great 13-14 products like Contenders, Prime and National Treasure.
Certainly possible the 90s throwback efforts may have played a part in the Beckett guys getting let go, but I've got no idea really.

The one thing Panini did not do over the four years was establish a "flagship" release, nothing to center their brand on. Four years is not really enough to judge them on, but apparently the NHL/NHLPA had seen enough.
DCUnited96 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2025, 02:17 PM   #20
mallowciraptor
Member
 
mallowciraptor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Maine
Posts: 718
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rohara99 View Post
2001-02 Private Stock Titanium was a sick set!
It's a shame this set had such an awful rookie class outside of Kovalchuk/Datsyuk.
mallowciraptor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2025, 07:08 PM   #21
JohnnyAppleseed
Member
 
Join Date: May 2022
Posts: 720
Default

Really missing 21/22 Black Diamond, 17/18 Compendium, and 22/23 Ovation.

But seriously, every single person in here looking at that list can name a mildly obscure set that's better than 80% of what's on here. 03/04 Bowman Draft. 08/09 Masterpieces. 19/20 Chronology. Hell even 14/15 Series 2.
JohnnyAppleseed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2025, 07:12 PM   #22
dherm360
Member
 
dherm360's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 5,427
Default

2005-06 UD had Crosby and OVI and Lunquivst--pretty good set
dherm360 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2025, 10:19 AM   #23
mfw13
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 17,479
Default

Lists like these are pretty useless, since everyone has different preferences....

My list would include:

2001-02 and 2002-03 Topps Heritage Hockey (the classic 1954-55 and 57-58 designs)

2008-09 UD Masterpieces Brushstrokes...great looking cards and one of the best auto checklists out there

2009-10 OPC Retro inserts....the classic 1979-80 design

The multi-year Upper Deck Heroes subsets and autos

2013-14 Prizm
mfw13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2025, 12:29 PM   #24
PatchSentinel
Member
 
PatchSentinel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,251
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DCUnited96 View Post
The inclusion of 2010-11 Score probably falls in the Dallas area self-love category.

Al Muir and at least one other former writer left Beckett to head up Panini's entry in the hockey card market. They has a decent outlook on what hockey cards should be, including 2010-11 Score, the Pinnacle releases, and others. Their vision apparently did not match with the higher ups at Panini, as they were let go somewhere around year two. There were non-disclosure agreements, so the details will probably never be known.

Muir was rehired by Beckett later in the decade and is currently the Senior editor.
Pinnacle was a good, cheap break; I broke a lot of 10/11 and 11/12 Pinnacle because of the price point alone. As far as their high-end effort, 2010-11 Dominion was amazing. It had a great mix of legends and newer players with nice card designs as well as a slew of bonus cards per box-pack, although there were some gimmicky cards like huge mem and auto booklets, etc. I guess there isn't a big rookie to chase for that set, though, with maybe Bobrovsky and P.K. Subban probably being the biggest ones. The next few years of Dominion releases never matched the feel of 10/11 IMO. 10/11 Dominion rarely gets mentioned; it's an under-the-radar gem. Loved breaking that product!

Also 2013-14 Panini National Treasures, the main appeal which is the RPAs, including MacKinnon's RPA.
PatchSentinel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2025, 01:14 PM   #25
cbeauch87
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: Washington
Posts: 1,071
Default

The Regina Pats team set being on there is absolutely insane. A PSA 10 of that card can be had for $200 now. I had a buddy sell a few PSA 10's after his last World Juniors appearance for $3000 each.
cbeauch87 is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © 2019, Blowout Cards Inc.