Blowout Cards Forums
2025 Black Friday

Go Back   Blowout Cards Forums > BLOWOUTS HOBBY TALK > FOOTBALL

Notices

FOOTBALL Post your Football Cards Hobby Talk

View Poll Results: Does this card warrant a PSA 9?
Yes 8 61.54%
No - PSA 8 3 23.08%
No - PSA 7 1 7.69%
Other 1 7.69%
Voters: 13. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-25-2023, 08:56 PM   #1
ReggieBush22
Member
 
ReggieBush22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,604
Default Do you think this 1986 Topps Rice deserves a PSA 9?

At first glance, this looks like an absolute blazer but look at "49ers". How much does this factory defect affect your opinion of this card?

https://www.ebay.com/itm/35498012848...mis&media=COPY
ReggieBush22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2023, 09:03 PM   #2
Grave252
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Posts: 561
Default

Grading is subjective, doesn’t really matter. It graded a 9, so it’s a 9. Weve all seen 10s that “deserve” an 8 or worse, but people have such an obsession with PSA slabs and buying the grade, the number is all the matters, even if the condition doesn’t agree.
Grave252 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2023, 09:06 PM   #3
ReggieBush22
Member
 
ReggieBush22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,604
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grave252 View Post
Grading is subjective, doesn’t really matter. It graded a 9, so it’s a 9. Weve all seen 10s that “deserve” an 8 or worse, but people have such an obsession with PSA slabs and buying the grade, the number is all the matters, even if the condition doesn’t agree.
That's kind of why I am asking for opinions LOL.
ReggieBush22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2023, 09:20 PM   #4
MarsAttacks
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 316
Default

Combination of nice front and decent back centering on this card is really though. Given that and overall sharp corners, I think a 9 is perfectly fine.
MarsAttacks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2023, 09:34 PM   #5
ReggieBush22
Member
 
ReggieBush22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,604
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarsAttacks View Post
Combination of nice front and decent back centering on this card is really though. Given that and overall sharp corners, I think a 9 is perfectly fine.
Kind of my thinking too. I've never been a big haggler for a minor, factory defect on the surface. Always been much more about corners, edges and centering for me.
ReggieBush22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2023, 09:46 PM   #6
MarsAttacks
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 316
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ReggieBush22 View Post
Kind of my thinking too. I've never been a big haggler for a minor, factory defect on the surface. Always been much more about corners, edges and centering for me.
Yes. I value the importance of centering and corners greater than a print defect. 86 Topps has lots of print defects, so it’s not like it’s unusual. I recently got back 3 86 Rice that were PSA 8. Overall solid looking examples. No complaints given current grading standards. Yet I think this is example graded years ago is nicer overall.
MarsAttacks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2023, 10:54 PM   #7
jplarson
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 15,578
Default

It's a veritable goldmine.
jplarson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2023, 03:25 PM   #8
RustyDawg37
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 1,048
Default

it probably got a 9 because of the print defect
__________________
Football Set Needs Below: Turkey Red, Magic, Mayo, Gridiron Kings, Refractors, Topps Gold
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1i7C-OoiAGOh9ZYdJsyC4uq7OfRuZNlOD3kf5d1MDqJg/edit?usp=sharing
IG: rustyshobbies
RustyDawg37 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2023, 03:38 PM   #9
oplum29
Member
 
oplum29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 10,405
Default

this is an old school PSA grade. i think in a more current PSA mode, it's a PSA 9 "PD" for "print defect" on it.
__________________
"got em, got em, need em, got em, got em, need em, got em" - Little Monsters
oplum29 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2023, 03:44 PM   #10
49erRCCollector
Member
 
49erRCCollector's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 12,619
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jplarson View Post
It's a veritable goldmine.
Well done.

I would not have personally given that card a 9. But check the serial #, that's borderline dot matrix font on that label. That had to be an early example.
__________________
Will MASSIVELY overpay for: 2002 Fleer Authentix #180, 181 Derek Smith & Zack Bronson AND 2007 Upper Deck Target Exclusive Rookies Autographs #261 Joe Staley #'d to /5
49erRCCollector is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2023, 04:57 PM   #11
ReggieBush22
Member
 
ReggieBush22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,604
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RustyDawg37 View Post
it probably got a 9 because of the print defect
Yeah, i think it's that nice too. I mean everything else looks pretty much PSA 10 material. It's a blazer in my eyes.
ReggieBush22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2023, 06:26 PM   #12
daveyc1
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: maine
Posts: 2,022
Default

that card looks perfectly fine in a psa 9 holder.
daveyc1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2023, 01:01 AM   #13
JWBlue
Member
 
JWBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 9,650
Default

I actually think it does.
JWBlue is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © 2019, Blowout Cards Inc.