Blowout Cards Forums
AD Heritage

Go Back   Blowout Cards Forums > BLOWOUTS HOBBY TALK > BASEBALL

Notices

BASEBALL Post your Baseball Cards Hobby Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-19-2021, 05:04 PM   #476
Cam Brady
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 497
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by babybull View Post
They can't do this without Topps people.

Narrator: They will absolutely do this without Topps employees
Cam Brady is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2021, 05:04 PM   #477
JRX
Member
 
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 16,065
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by slambam View Post
Ding ding ding. Just stupid. No license for the company who's been producing cards for decades. Complete BS that they only allow 1 licensee.
They don't care, its about how much money they can squeeze out of their license over the short term. Fanatics could also probably just eat it if the market collapses. If anything this is just a way to funnel money to the owners and players. Much like ticket paying fans, they don't care about you. "Where else you gonna go, now buy this product"
JRX is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2021, 05:05 PM   #478
smanzari
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: N/A
Posts: 10,697
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by whitmm View Post
I hate to say it, but I think you underestimate how many people already buy it. There's still more in the collecting community than what you see on blowout. And if it's the only thing, people will still flock to it. Anything to make a quick buck.
MLBPA also signed with Fanatics meaning no more Panini or Non-Logo'ed cards of current players unless they're not in MLBPA
smanzari is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2021, 05:05 PM   #479
Glowbug27
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 164
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by slambam View Post
Ding ding ding. Just stupid. No license for the company who's been producing cards for decades. Complete BS that they only allow 1 licensee.
They allow 1 licensee because the licensee paid a ton of dough for exclusivity.
Glowbug27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2021, 05:06 PM   #480
jayjay0122
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,169
Default

So is this basically the beginning of the end for companies like Blowout and Dave & Adams?
jayjay0122 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2021, 05:07 PM   #481
Cam Brady
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 497
Default

Paying $200 million (10 times what Topps paid the MLBPA in 2020) for the rights doesn't make sense. Thats an entire quarter of Topps current sales.
Cam Brady is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2021, 05:07 PM   #482
JRX
Member
 
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 16,065
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jayjay0122 View Post
So is this basically the beginning of the end for companies like Blowout and Dave & Adams?
They'll be replaced with a Fanatics shop run by people making minimum wage.
JRX is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2021, 05:08 PM   #483
JRX
Member
 
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 16,065
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cam Brady View Post
Paying $200 million (10 times what Topps paid the MLBPA in 2020) for the rights doesn't make sense. Thats an entire quarter of Topps current sales.
Was it a legitimate business plan or was it just a way to funnel money to the players and the league? Based on what they paid, it doesn't seem like they could make it back.
JRX is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2021, 05:08 PM   #484
smanzari
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: N/A
Posts: 10,697
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jayjay0122 View Post
So is this basically the beginning of the end for companies like Blowout and Dave & Adams?
Depends on the Distribution plans of Fanatics and the specifics of the contract with MLB, could also have implications on current distributors
smanzari is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2021, 05:08 PM   #485
Doublexthebeast
Member
 
Doublexthebeast's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Midland, TX
Posts: 8,806
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by smanzari View Post
MLBPA also signed with Fanatics meaning no more Panini or Non-Logo'ed cards of current players unless they're not in MLBPA
That’s a big part of this deal which makes it even worse. Essentially, a dual license which allows for only 1 manufacturer like NBA.
__________________
Shane McClanahan Super Collector. Always Buying.
Doublexthebeast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2021, 05:08 PM   #486
Aston14
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 59
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cam Brady View Post
Paying $200 million (10 times what Topps paid the MLBPA in 2020) for the rights doesn't make sense. Thats an entire quarter of Topps current sales.
Probably factors in the ownership stake that the MLBPA is getting in the venture. In addition to the license fee they will get a percentage of profits.
Aston14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2021, 05:09 PM   #487
Glowbug27
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 164
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cam Brady View Post
Paying $200 million (10 times what Topps paid the MLBPA in 2020) for the rights doesn't make sense. Thats an entire quarter of Topps current sales.
That is called big business. Read the stories about how Walmart would sell milk so cheap at its stores when it would move into a new neighborhood that the Mom and Pop stores would buy their inventory at Walmart's stores to sell in their stores with the idea that Walmart would ultimately drive them out of business.
Glowbug27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2021, 05:09 PM   #488
IntergalacticSp
Member
 
IntergalacticSp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 184
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JRX View Post
Was it a legitimate business plan or was it just a way to funnel money to the players and the league? Based on what they paid, it doesn't seem like they could make it back.
Fanatics is buying at the top of the market. More than likely they justified their bid using optimistic projections of growth that will not materialize in the future. Happens all the time in the business world to supposedly smart people.
IntergalacticSp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2021, 05:10 PM   #489
redauto5
Member
 
redauto5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,308
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JRX View Post
2 years without fully licensed cards could also sink the baseball card hobby.
Naa, we will get an 86-87 Fleer like set in 2025 and everyone will clamor for it. Meanwhile, hobbiests get bored without anything to rip for 2 years and singles prices go through the roof!

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
redauto5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2021, 05:10 PM   #490
imbluestreak23
Member
 
imbluestreak23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Meandering the matrix code that the hobby/forum overlords spit out
Posts: 17,950
Default

Where did it say that Fanatics paid 10X what Topps paid in 2020?

If Fanatics did that we are all doomed. That essentially means that for Fanatics to make a profit, sales need to 10X from Topps 2020 baseline number which means:
-10x more product and/or
-10x higher print run when print runs are already stuipd high and/or
-10x less autographs because yah know those cost money and/or
-10x less REAL GAME USED items because yeah, yah know those cost money too and Fanatics has an endless supply of replica swatches from jerseys to gloves, helmets, balls, etc. Endless supply of worthless junk to insert into cardboard.
__________________
@shortslabs
I'VE WITNESSED HOW THE SAUSAGE IS MADE HERE...IT'S ROTTEN
https://www.youtube.com/c/TylerShort
imbluestreak23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2021, 05:11 PM   #491
mcwildcats
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Big Blue Nation
Posts: 5,255
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by imbluestreak23 View Post
Chrome refractors and Topps flagship rare will increase substantially in value over the next 5 years.

Happened with Topps basketball, it will happen again. If there is a superstar rookie class in 2022 or 2023, those cards will become iconic if it's a deep RC logo class or Bowman Chrome class.
IF?! Wander says hello.
mcwildcats is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2021, 05:11 PM   #492
possaw
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 416
Default

So crazy. I cannot imagine a world without topps baseball


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Collecting: University of Arizona Alum, Nick Foles, Mark Buehrle, any Green Bay
possaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2021, 05:11 PM   #493
Glowbug27
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 164
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IntergalacticSp View Post
Fanatics is buying at the top of the market. More than likely they justified their bid using optimistic projections of growth that will not materialize in the future. Happens all the time in the business world to supposedly smart people.
Way simpler than that. Fanatics paid to clear the competition out of their new business venture, trading cards. If you have the resources to pay to do it, you can do that.
Glowbug27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2021, 05:11 PM   #494
pewe
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 26,643
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by imbluestreak23 View Post
Where did it say that Fanatics paid 10X what Topps paid in 2020?

If Fanatics did that we are all doomed. That essentially means that for Fanatics to make a profit, sales need to 10X from Topps 2020 baseline number which means:
-10x more product and/or
-10x higher print run when print runs are already stuipd high and/or
-10x less autographs because yah know those cost money and/or
-10x less REAL GAME USED items because yeah, yah know those cost money too and Fanatics has an endless supply of replica swatches from jerseys to gloves, helmets, balls, etc. Endless supply of worthless junk to insert into cardboard.

Is it 10x / year?

BTW remember they also take out Panini with this move, so they already gain some benefit there


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
pewe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2021, 05:12 PM   #495
Aston14
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 59
Default

There was a memo to players from the head of the MLBPA explaining the deal. Again, I assume the number includes the ownership stake that the union is getting in the new venture.
Aston14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2021, 05:12 PM   #496
Southpaw73
Member
 
Southpaw73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 326
Default

2025 I believe… brutal


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Southpaw73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2021, 05:12 PM   #497
Cam Brady
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 497
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by imbluestreak23 View Post
Where did it say that Fanatics paid 10X what Topps paid in 2020?

If Fanatics did that we are all doomed. That essentially means that for Fanatics to make a profit, sales need to 10X from Topps 2020 baseline number which means:
-10x more product and/or
-10x higher print run when print runs are already stuipd high and/or
-10x less autographs because yah know those cost money and/or
-10x less REAL GAME USED items because yeah, yah know those cost money too and Fanatics has an endless supply of replica swatches from jerseys to gloves, helmets, balls, etc. Endless supply of worthless junk to insert into cardboard.
Gotta find an article that Tony Clark is quoted in.
Cam Brady is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2021, 05:13 PM   #498
pewe
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 26,643
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glowbug27 View Post
Way simpler than that. Fanatics paid to clear the competition out of their new business venture, trading cards. If you have the resources to pay to do it, you can do that.

They’ve become the US Steel or Standard Oil of the trading card world


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
pewe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2021, 05:13 PM   #499
redauto5
Member
 
redauto5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,308
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ThoseBackPages View Post
my body is not ready
Mine either buddy, mine either. Super sad day but it seems like us OG types have been grieving what was for a year or 2 now. This just cements that. We will adjust and can still have fond memories of 1991 Fleer Chris Sabos.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

Last edited by redauto5; 08-19-2021 at 05:23 PM.
redauto5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2021, 05:13 PM   #500
imbluestreak23
Member
 
imbluestreak23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Meandering the matrix code that the hobby/forum overlords spit out
Posts: 17,950
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pewe View Post
Is it 10x / year?

BTW remember they also take out Panini with this move, so they already gain some benefit there


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Good question, I wasn't sure if those quoting 10x meant $200 million/year or $200 million for life of license (presumably < 10 years because if it was $200 million/10 years, that's what Topps was paying on a per year basis)
__________________
@shortslabs
I'VE WITNESSED HOW THE SAUSAGE IS MADE HERE...IT'S ROTTEN
https://www.youtube.com/c/TylerShort
imbluestreak23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © 2019, Blowout Cards Inc.