![]() |
|
|||||||
| FOOTBALL Post your Football Cards Hobby Talk |
| View Poll Results: What will the 49ers do with the #3 pick? | |||
| Mac Jones |
|
51 | 28.98% |
| Justin Fields |
|
67 | 38.07% |
| Trey Lance |
|
34 | 19.32% |
| Zach Wilson |
|
8 | 4.55% |
| Trade out of the spot |
|
16 | 9.09% |
| Voters: 176. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#76 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 999
|
easy to look good in Alabama offense when you play with all 1st round O-linemen, Heisman WR, etc.. if Shanahan wants a Kirk Cousins type just go get Cousins..
|
|
|
|
|
|
#77 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Cali baby!
Posts: 21,861
|
Alabama's 3rd stringers would be starting on 99% of other D1 colleges. I guess people see Tom Brady with the unathletic body and pale skin.
__________________
There are the intangibles that set someone apart from the pack.So the blur isn't your inability to see his greatness, it's merely the inability to measure it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#78 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,452
|
The mobile QB is so massively over rated
Is it awesome to have that in your back pocket. For sure But you don’t need to be super athletic to win in the NFL The last 20 years has proved that. The 2 best QBs could not move at all THings have not changed since 2010 or 2015. People are not faster Hell Aaron Rodgers ran for 149 yards last year And ran away with the mvp 3 of the best pocket passers in the league are Wilson Watson mahomes They are mvps if they never ran for a 3rd and 8 again It’s nice to have. But terribly over rated. And if you do it to much it leads to injury I will take intellectual player with above average arm talent over fast runner |
|
|
|
|
|
#79 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 10,405
|
Quote:
also, Shanahan has known Fields for a while. and don't forget that the 49ers drafted Solomon Thomas, who went to college with John Lynch. so yeah, there's that too.
__________________
"got em, got em, need em, got em, got em, need em, got em" - Little Monsters |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#80 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 3,931
|
At this point, I am just grasping at anything trying to make sense out of all of it. I'm still thinking they will pick Trey but I hope it will be Justin and will be left shaking my head in disbelief if it is Mac. I love the NFL off-season!
__________________
They see what they have been told to see. |
|
|
|
|
|
#81 |
|
Member
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#82 |
|
Member
|
Today the sports talk shows are all reporting that the 49ers have narrowed it down to Mac Jones or Trey Lance and aren't considering Justin Fields. Some are suggesting that people within the organization could be split between which one to pick.
__________________
Collecting: Topps Chrome parallels of Minnesota Twins Maybe the real gem mint 10s were the friends we made along the way... |
|
|
|
|
|
#83 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 17,095
|
I will laugh if they draft Mac Jones at 3. Trading up that high for a guy who probably ceiling would be the guy they are replacing in Jimmy G. Mac Jones has the 2nd least likely chance to bust behind Lawrence but I think out of the 5 1st round QBs he has the lowest celing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#84 | ||
|
Member
|
Quote:
Quote:
We do know the 49ers are in win now mode and not in a rebuild situation. By most accounts Mac is the most pro ready QB not named TL. I’ve read several draft “experts” and comments from GMs who think he can/will be a very good NFL QB. If Kyle thinks Mac is most ready and capable to step in and run his offense at a high level then he had reason to think Mac wouldn’t make it to 12 and 3 was the pick he could be certain he’d get who he wanted. Now I’m not saying I think paying what he did for the pick was the right move if he picks Mac. But Fields nor Lance are guaranteed hits either obviously and if he takes either one of them and they turn into Ryan Leaf or Vince Young then the trade is still going to go down as a massive over pay.
__________________
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#85 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 611
|
This has to be the most talked about projected pick in the history of projecting picks and I can't wait until the 49ers finally just pick their guy and the media shuts up about it.
3 straight weeks of talking heads on ESPN and elsewhere saying how Shannahan and Lynch aren't making the right decision, even though no one has any idea what decision they are making. Doesn't matter to them, they're not making the right move. This guy's falling, that guy's falling, they're reaching for this other guy. No. No one has fallen anywhere.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#86 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Detroit
Posts: 16,147
|
Quote:
It's pretty much standard in the NFL these days that teams that are well put together and have a QB on a rookie contract, have a better chance at competing for a title than those who spend top dollar on an average QB.
__________________
PC: Carolina Panthers and University of Arizona players, especially in UofA uniform Jonathan Stewart PC: http://sportscardalbum.com/u/zonacats8/a/jonathan-stewart-pc Star Lotulelei PC: http://sportscardalbum.com/u/zonacats8/a/star-lotulelei-pc |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#87 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Cali baby!
Posts: 21,861
|
Quote:
__________________
There are the intangibles that set someone apart from the pack.So the blur isn't your inability to see his greatness, it's merely the inability to measure it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#88 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#89 |
|
Member
|
Whoever they draft will go into the best situation for a first round QB since Mahomes, and I think they'll be at least moderately successful no matter what. A Shanahan offense with a solid OL, plus Kittle/Deebo/Aiyuk - they're going to be just fine.
That said, as a Packers fan, I sure do hope they opt for McCorkle. The fact that Fields may well be QB4 or QB5 in this draft is absurd.
__________________
I collect Packers, former Ohio State Buckeyes, Blue Jackets, and Cleveland Indians/Guardians. |
|
|
|
|
|
#90 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Cali baby!
Posts: 21,861
|
Quote:
__________________
There are the intangibles that set someone apart from the pack.So the blur isn't your inability to see his greatness, it's merely the inability to measure it. Last edited by Archangel1775; 04-27-2021 at 11:38 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#91 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Cali baby!
Posts: 21,861
|
And just like that: https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl...?ocid=msedgdhp
__________________
There are the intangibles that set someone apart from the pack.So the blur isn't your inability to see his greatness, it's merely the inability to measure it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#92 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Fayetteville
Posts: 2,835
|
I'm coming around on Lance, fields is DnD with that seizure info, any added risk is a no no at this spot. mac would seem like such a reach.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#93 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 744
|
fields, lance or trade #3 pick for a stock dropping watson
2/3 of those would be the right move |
|
|
|
|
|
#94 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 12,589
|
I'm warming up to Lance if Jimmy stays/plays this year.
Shanahan's "I cannot tell you who will be alive on draft day" comment might just be smoke but if Jimmy is getting shipped out I'd prefer Mac Jones who seems pro-ready.
__________________
Will MASSIVELY overpay for: 2002 Fleer Authentix #180, 181 Derek Smith & Zack Bronson AND 2007 Upper Deck Target Exclusive Rookies Autographs #261 Joe Staley #'d to /5 |
|
|
|
|
|
#95 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,098
|
They will take Mac Jones, but should take Fields but the better QB between them all will end up being Trey Lance.
__________________
http://s1271.photobucket.com/user/bwalter22/library/ Currently working on 2017 Topps Heritage Blue Refractor /68 set. Pm me if you have any for sale/trade |
|
|
|
|
|
#96 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Cali baby!
Posts: 21,861
|
Quote:
Jimmy G back to the Patriots for their second round pick #46? It would still be a terrible draft to trade all that to move up for Mac Jones. I dont see him better than Jimmy G the next 2 years. Of course injuries are the question mark. I just dont see the Niners finishing at the top of the NFC West without Jimmy G at QB the next 2 years(his contract). Sure they can give the Seahawks and Rams a challenge but I dont think they would be good enough. Then you have the Cardinals.
__________________
There are the intangibles that set someone apart from the pack.So the blur isn't your inability to see his greatness, it's merely the inability to measure it. Last edited by Archangel1775; 04-28-2021 at 10:31 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#97 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 3,931
|
If the 49ers can get a 2nd round pick for Jimmy it would be a huge win. After seeing Bridgewater go for a 6th I think they will struggle to get a 6th. Although he is 22-8 when on the field he has only been able to play in 30 of the 64 possible regular-season games in the last 4 years. When you make $27 million a year it takes up so much cap room that it is nearly impossible to keep a quality backup QB so you just pile up the L's when your starter is out. Nobody is going to want to take on that contract.
__________________
They see what they have been told to see. |
|
|
|
|
|
#98 |
|
Member
|
reports are they tried to trade the 3rd pick, jimmy g, and more picks to the packers for A-Aron...and were denied
__________________
SUPPORT #BostonStrong The One Fund & Parkinson's Research http://sportlots.com/dealers/?dealer=AzPats10 RIP Mom-2009, Dad-2021, Grandma-2018, PAPAJIM 11/22/10 ![]() Patriots 6 time Champs catching up to johnmabry47: are you on my ignore list too? 76 and counting |
|
|
|
|
|
#99 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 17,095
|
Stupid rumor that has zero truth into it because there is zero way the Packers could do that trade due to the cap hit of Rodgers going out and Jimmy G coming in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#100 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Rose Bowl
Posts: 18,107
|
I am basically resigned to the fact the Niners are getting Mac. I'm not gonna sit here and say I know better than Lynch or Shanny either, so I just hope they are right. It just didn't seem necessary to be so aggressive to move up if that was their guy. Moving up in the 7-9 range, sure, but not all the way up to 3.
__________________
IG: sixouttafivestars https://www.flickr.com/photos/197914865@N08/albums/72177720306943188 |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|