Blowout Cards Forums
AD Heritage

Go Back   Blowout Cards Forums > BLOWOUTS HOBBY TALK > FOOTBALL

Notices

FOOTBALL Post your Football Cards Hobby Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-03-2016, 10:12 AM   #26
Siberian13
Member
 
Siberian13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 78,118
Default

Yeah this tells you that Teddy is out all of next year or half the year. Can't waste AP and the defense they have now so it was going to happen.
__________________
O say, does that star-spangled banner yet wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave
Siberian13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2016, 10:13 AM   #27
nickha2
Member
 
nickha2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Lambeau Field
Posts: 6,907
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cnewby View Post
GB fans feeling some pressure.
haha not at all. We will still win the division. In fact I think more agree we would rather have Bradford come in and start without knowing the playbook than have someone like Hill who knows the playbook star the season.

Besides Bradford is made of glass and wont make it past week 3
nickha2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2016, 10:13 AM   #28
chitownbears22
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 8,689
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CC_123 View Post
Teddy is expected to make a full recovery with it being a 9-12 month recovery time. This trade has to deal with Teddy likely not making it back next season until week 6-8.
You are not a doctor, or his doctor! You have no idea if that is accurate. There are probably only a handful of people who know the true scope of this situation, and I promise you, Teddy hasn't been giving you any updates.

A trade for this year makes absolutely no sense, he has never played in a Norv style offense. He is an immobile QB playing behind a terrible OL (and he also has an injury history). There is no way that Bradford is fully game ready for a couple months, and being partially game ready has worked out GREAT for other teams who have been forced to trade for a stop gap QB late in the offseason. You don't mortgage a first round draft pick for a QB who is completely new to a system, unless you are thinking long-term.
chitownbears22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2016, 10:14 AM   #29
CC_123
Member
 
CC_123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: United States
Posts: 21,388
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nickha2 View Post
haha not at all. We will still win the division. In fact I think more agree we would rather have Bradford come in and start without knowing the playbook than have someone like Hill who knows the playbook star the season.

Besides Bradford is made of glass and wont make it past week 3
Bradford will make it past week 3 because he likely won't take the field until week 5 or after our bye week. He needs time to learn the playroom. Hill will likely start the first 4 weeks of the season
__________________
ALWAYS LOOKING FOR RARE ERIC DECKER (NFL), BOBBY JACKSON (NBA), AMIR COFFEY (NBA). ALSO VIKINGS CONTENDERS AUTOS!
CARDS FT/FS
https://www.flickr.com/photos/150768054@N07/albums/with/72157680856431204

Last edited by CC_123; 09-03-2016 at 10:19 AM.
CC_123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2016, 10:14 AM   #30
cnewby
Member
 
cnewby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: MI
Posts: 18,337
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nickha2 View Post
haha not at all. We will still win the division. In fact I think more agree we would rather have Bradford come in and start without knowing the playbook than have someone like Hill who knows the playbook star the season.

Besides Bradford is made of glass and wont make it past week 3
Quoted.

Bradford > Rodgers.
__________________
#ALLRISE - THE ORIGINAL HASHTAG - ALL OTHERS ARE CUTE IMITATIONS
cnewby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2016, 10:18 AM   #31
arott23
Member
 
arott23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 2,198
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nickha2 View Post
haha not at all. We will still win the division. In fact I think more agree we would rather have Bradford come in and start without knowing the playbook than have someone like Hill who knows the playbook star the season.

Besides Bradford is made of glass and wont make it past week 3
If he made it through most of last year behind that Eagles line he'll be alright this year. This is just a lot to bet on a guy who hasn't played two full seasons back to back.
__________________
PC: Randy Moss, Travis Hafner, Carson Wentz,
and Easton Stick
*Looking for another 1998 Contenders Randy Moss auto*
*Always buying Travis Hafner game used items*
arott23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2016, 10:19 AM   #32
CC_123
Member
 
CC_123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: United States
Posts: 21,388
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chitownbears22 View Post
You are not a doctor, or his doctor! You have no idea if that is accurate. There are probably only a handful of people who know the true scope of this situation, and I promise you, Teddy hasn't been giving you any updates.

A trade for this year makes absolutely no sense, he has never played in a Norv style offense. He is an immobile QB playing behind a terrible OL (and he also has an injury history). There is no way that Bradford is fully game ready for a couple months, and being partially game ready has worked out GREAT for other teams who have been forced to trade for a stop gap QB late in the offseason. You don't mortgage a first round draft pick for a QB who is completely new to a system, unless you are thinking long-term.
You know all, don't you? The estimated recovery time right now has been stated as 9-12 months. Obviously that can change but it's what I've heard to this point. But obviously someone woke up on the wrong side of the bed and feels like jumping down someone's throat in the early AM.

Also, I don't like this trade. Bradford is injury prone like crazy but to say we have a terrible OL is pretty ridiculous and you obviously haven't seen them play this preseason. Our offensive line is meshing and has looked very solid and has created nice time in the pocket this preseason.

Also, Bradford isn't going to be starting right off the bat. He likely will sit behind Hill until week 5 or after the Bye Week. The Vikings aren't going to toss him out there in a weeks time without knowing any of the playbook and having no connection with the receivers
__________________
ALWAYS LOOKING FOR RARE ERIC DECKER (NFL), BOBBY JACKSON (NBA), AMIR COFFEY (NBA). ALSO VIKINGS CONTENDERS AUTOS!
CARDS FT/FS
https://www.flickr.com/photos/150768054@N07/albums/with/72157680856431204
CC_123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2016, 10:20 AM   #33
Postman
Member
 
Postman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,191
Default

Cant believe they gave up a 1st and 4th rounder for Bradford. Crazy!!!!!!!!!
Postman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2016, 10:22 AM   #34
pejc300
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 10,757
Default

ESPN Fail...

Minnesota Vikings trade for Philadelphia Eagles QB Sam Bradford

Quote:
The Vikings had inquired about Bradford after Bridgewater's injury earlier this week, sources told ESPN, but the Eagles were said to be very happy with Bradford's progress this preseason.

Instead, with Bradford's exit, Chase Daniel will start the regular season as the starting quarterback for Chip Kelly and the Eagles with rookie Carson Wentz waiting in the wings. The No. 2 overall pick in this year's draft, Wentz missed the last three preseason games after breaking his ribs.
pejc300 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2016, 10:22 AM   #35
JMarchand1981
Member
 
JMarchand1981's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 34,438
Default

Bradford will be injured by week three.
JMarchand1981 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2016, 10:23 AM   #36
CC_123
Member
 
CC_123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: United States
Posts: 21,388
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Postman View Post
Cant believe they gave up a 1st and 4th rounder for Bradford. Crazy!!!!!!!!!
I'm not happy about the 1st rounder but what it does show me is the Vikings are committed to winning right now and aren't willing to throw this season away. That, I can at least appreciate. If Bradford stays healthy, it'll be a solid deal to have a successful season, but that is an incredibly big if.
__________________
ALWAYS LOOKING FOR RARE ERIC DECKER (NFL), BOBBY JACKSON (NBA), AMIR COFFEY (NBA). ALSO VIKINGS CONTENDERS AUTOS!
CARDS FT/FS
https://www.flickr.com/photos/150768054@N07/albums/with/72157680856431204
CC_123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2016, 10:24 AM   #37
CC_123
Member
 
CC_123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: United States
Posts: 21,388
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JMarchand1981 View Post
Bradford will be injured by week three.
Like I said above, he probably wont even be on the field for the first 3 weeks. I could see him sitting for the first 4 weeks to learn the playbook and mesh with the receivers.
__________________
ALWAYS LOOKING FOR RARE ERIC DECKER (NFL), BOBBY JACKSON (NBA), AMIR COFFEY (NBA). ALSO VIKINGS CONTENDERS AUTOS!
CARDS FT/FS
https://www.flickr.com/photos/150768054@N07/albums/with/72157680856431204
CC_123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2016, 10:24 AM   #38
chitownbears22
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 8,689
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CC_123 View Post
You know all, don't you? The estimated recovery time right now has been stated as 9-12 months. Obviously that can change but it's what I've heard to this point. But obviously someone woke up on the wrong side of the bed and feels like jumping down someone's throat in the early AM.

Also, I don't like this trade. Bradford is injury prone like crazy but to say we have a terrible OL is pretty ridiculous and you obviously haven't seen them play this preseason. Our offensive line is meshing and has looked very solid and has created nice time in the pocket this preseason.

Also, Bradford isn't going to be starting right off the bat. He likely will sit behind Hill until week 5 or after the Bye Week. The Vikings aren't going to toss him out there in a weeks time without knowing any of the playbook and having no connection with the receivers
I am calling you out for acting like the opinion of a beat writer is factual. No doctor has given a timetable, the team has not issued a statement, and anything being said is pure speculation with the basis being a comparison to other players with similar injuries.
chitownbears22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2016, 10:28 AM   #39
jason122883
Member
 
jason122883's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Colorado
Posts: 20,343
Default

If Minnesota gave up a 1st round pick for a QB, I don't see him riding the pine for the first 4 games to learn the offense. I'd assume he will be under center week 1. Week 2 if he really isnt getting it. No way he sets for the first few weeks though
__________________
If you can not ship within 48 hours, please let me know before I pay
jason122883 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2016, 10:32 AM   #40
HBMC
Member
 
HBMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Missouri
Posts: 16,396
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by freethrowtommy View Post
2017 1st round and 2018 4th round?

Minnesota got FLEECED!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Postman View Post
Cant believe they gave up a 1st and 4th rounder for Bradford. Crazy!!!!!!!!!
Honestly, if the First round pick is bottom half of the first round, it was a good deal, especially after they only have to pay $7m this season for a starting caliber QB. The 4th Rounder two years from now doesn't help. Minnesota had plenty of leverage on this situation to dictate not paying $11m in bonus money.

Quote:
Originally Posted by CC_123 View Post
I have no clue what Spielman was thinking with this trade. Get an injury prone QB for a 1st round pick? Hell, you could've gotten Mike Glennon, AJ McCarron, and Mark Sanchez for way cheaper. I hate giving up a 1st. A completely desperate and horrible move. One of the very few he has made as the GM
Bradford is unacceptable but Sanchez is? Do you read what you type? Sam Bradford may always be very underwhelming, but he is exactly what Minnesota needs at QB, sure armed, accurate and he has the best RB he's ever played with behind him now. He will also stretch the field with receivers, something Bridgewater has struggled with. He's also got a lot more experience than McCarron and Glennon.

Also, you're assuming that McCarron & Glennon were/are available for less.
__________________
I PC: Dallas Cowboys Arkansas Razorbacks StL Cards KC Chiefs
Tyron Smith, Travis Frederick and Zack Martin PC'er
HBMC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2016, 10:33 AM   #41
bbplaya11
Member
 
bbplaya11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: boston, MA
Posts: 4,690
Default

A 1 and a 4? Jezz I wonder what they would of gave up for a good qb
__________________
http://bbplaya.webs.com
Carolina Panthers
Boston Celtics
Courtney Lee
bbplaya11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2016, 10:35 AM   #42
Pot Roast
Member
 
Pot Roast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Best state evahhh
Posts: 2,311
Default

Calling it now, Matt Kalil blows an assignment leading to a Broken body for Bradford.
__________________
"Tell me Superman, do you bleed? You will."- Von Miller
Super Bowl 50 CHAMPS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Currently looking for:
Shane Ray Prizm 1/1, Demaryius Thomas 2015 prizm /10
Pot Roast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2016, 10:36 AM   #43
arott23
Member
 
arott23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 2,198
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pot Roast View Post
Calling it now, Matt Kalil blows an assignment leading to a Broken body for Bradford.
And no one would be surprised haha
__________________
PC: Randy Moss, Travis Hafner, Carson Wentz,
and Easton Stick
*Looking for another 1998 Contenders Randy Moss auto*
*Always buying Travis Hafner game used items*
arott23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2016, 10:37 AM   #44
chansen10
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: illinois
Posts: 4,857
Default

Wow.. Poor Teddy.. His long term future must be in serious doubt.. The Vikings had to make some sort of move.. Too good of a team... Looks like I shouldn't have dropped Stefon Diggs
__________________
ALWAYS BUYING RENATO NUNEZ BC AUTOS
chansen10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2016, 10:38 AM   #45
chitownbears22
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 8,689
Default

Vikings looked elsewhere for a QB it seems. Ian Rap is saying the Chiefs were contacted for Foles and the Ravens were contacted about a backup in their system. Bradford they felt was the best deal. I think this continues to give credence to the idea that Teddy may not be coming back in 2017 either (or at least there is a strong possibility).
chitownbears22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2016, 10:38 AM   #46
tolrobb
Member
 
tolrobb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,846
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cnewby View Post
GB fans feeling some pressure.
well, some laughter anyways
__________________
Bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/69440988@N05/albums
tolrobb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2016, 10:39 AM   #47
Coug46n2
Member
 
Coug46n2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Washington State
Posts: 6,151
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CC_123 View Post
I'm not happy about the 1st rounder but what it does show me is the Vikings are committed to winning right now and aren't willing to throw this season away. That, I can at least appreciate. If Bradford stays healthy, it'll be a solid deal to have a successful season, but that is an incredibly big if.
This is how I feel as well. Not a huge fan of Bradford, and the two picks were a lot to give up, but no risk no reward. The Vikes are good right now, let's do what we can to make the most of the window of opportunity. I don't love the move, but I do respect it as a fan.
Coug46n2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2016, 10:43 AM   #48
CC_123
Member
 
CC_123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: United States
Posts: 21,388
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HBMC View Post
Honestly, if the First round pick is bottom half of the first round, it was a good deal, especially after they only have to pay $7m this season for a starting caliber QB. The 4th Rounder two years from now doesn't help. Minnesota had plenty of leverage on this situation to dictate not paying $11m in bonus money.

Bradford is unacceptable but Sanchez is? Do you read what you type? Sam Bradford may always be very underwhelming, but he is exactly what Minnesota needs at QB, sure armed, accurate and he has the best RB he's ever played with behind him now. He will also stretch the field with receivers, something Bridgewater has struggled with. He's also got a lot more experience than McCarron and Glennon.

Also, you're assuming that McCarron & Glennon were/are available for less.
I'm fine with Bradford, just not at the price tag. I'm no fan of Sanchez but he would've been a ton cheaper. I like Bradford more then Sanchez obviously and Bradford is better then all the options out there but I feel we gave up a little too much. I respect what they are doing in the sense of keeping a winning team on the field, I just would've liked to keep the 1st round pick. And I would've rather given a 1st for McCarron or Glennon but I have to believe we could've offered a 2nd and 4th and snagged one of them
__________________
ALWAYS LOOKING FOR RARE ERIC DECKER (NFL), BOBBY JACKSON (NBA), AMIR COFFEY (NBA). ALSO VIKINGS CONTENDERS AUTOS!
CARDS FT/FS
https://www.flickr.com/photos/150768054@N07/albums/with/72157680856431204
CC_123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2016, 10:44 AM   #49
CC_123
Member
 
CC_123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: United States
Posts: 21,388
Default

Adrian Peterson is excited about the deal
__________________
ALWAYS LOOKING FOR RARE ERIC DECKER (NFL), BOBBY JACKSON (NBA), AMIR COFFEY (NBA). ALSO VIKINGS CONTENDERS AUTOS!
CARDS FT/FS
https://www.flickr.com/photos/150768054@N07/albums/with/72157680856431204
CC_123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2016, 10:44 AM   #50
HBMC
Member
 
HBMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Missouri
Posts: 16,396
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CC_123 View Post
I'm fine with Bradford, just not at the price tag. I'm no fan of Sanchez but he would've been a ton cheaper. I like Bradford more then Sanchez obviously and Bradford is better then all the options out there but I feel we gave up a little too much. I respect what they are doing in the sense of keeping a winning team on the field, I just would've liked to keep the 1st round pick. And I would've rather given a 1st for McCarron or Glennon but I have to believe we could've offered a 2nd and 4th and snagged one of them
Price of doing business, that 1st won't be missed if the Vikings get to the NFCCG.
__________________
I PC: Dallas Cowboys Arkansas Razorbacks StL Cards KC Chiefs
Tyron Smith, Travis Frederick and Zack Martin PC'er
HBMC is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © 2019, Blowout Cards Inc.