![]() |
|
Register | FAQ | Blowout Cards Shop | My iTrader | Forum Rules | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
BASKETBALL Post your Basketball Cards Hobby Talk |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#451 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: TX
Posts: 685
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#452 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2024
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 53
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#453 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: TX
Posts: 685
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#454 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: GA
Posts: 108
|
![]()
Well, Is HellCat right on the Star101 Jordan? Thoughts?
Based on this current Probstein auction (PSA7 )currently reaching 30K https://www.ebay.com/itm/37540618328...3Avlp_homepage (i only bring this up, as i have interest in this card myself) I dont collect basketball, but i like the older guys like Kareem above^^^
__________________
WTB: 1916-20 UNC Big Heads Need: PING BODIE |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#455 | |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 6,492
|
![]() Quote:
As for the Jordan 101, it's like it should be treated as a separate topic from Star generally. Star's presentation quality varies (although the design doesn't), namely in terms of photo quality and cropping. The 101 is rather stereotypical of what people find disappointing in some of the Star releases. The Olajuwon RC meanwhile has no such issues, it is the grail Olajuwon card |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#456 | |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 6,492
|
![]() Quote:
I would assume that the best-condition 101s in BGS slabs are going to move over to PSA ones over time |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#457 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: GA
Posts: 108
|
![]()
Probstein PSA 7 fetched $30,099
Some sales that ended on 5/16: PWCC BGS 8.5 fetched 45.6K (WOW???) PWCC PSA 6 fetched 17.4K PWCC BGS 7.5 fetched 18K meanwhile in Heritage: BGS 8 fetched 27.6K BGS 8.5 fetched 28.8K Currently PWCC has another BGS 8.5 currently @ 29.5K ending next week My conclusion that a BGS 7.5 seems to be in-line with a PSA 6??? I do not know to justify the PWCC 8.5 sale 45.6K tho???
__________________
WTB: 1916-20 UNC Big Heads Need: PING BODIE |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#458 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Wake Forest, NC
Posts: 213
|
![]() Quote:
The first (and maybe only, haven’t checked pop reports in a while) PSA 9 was a crossover from a BGS 8.5. The 8.5s vary a lot in presentation. Maybe the 8.5 you are referencing was one that the bidders thought appeared undergraded. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#459 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,296
|
![]()
Crickets on the 950K PSA 9 101 sale?! Man guys just keep doubting my insight. I told you long ago to grab one now most of you are priced out in this thread.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#460 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 7,630
|
![]()
When this thread was created, BGS 8.5's were selling for $40-50K. Most recent BGS 8.5 sales are around 30K. PSA 8's were selling for 85K-115K. Most recent PSA 8 sales are around 70K. PSA 7's were selling for 30K and they are still selling for the same price. Are we going to start recommending 1986 Fleer PSA 10's again if a BGS 10 fetches a million plus in a private sale, i.e. based on one isolated private sale of a low pop copy?
__________________
Jealousy is a form of hatred built on Insecurity. It's the unhappy and insecure people who show hatred, jealousy and try to bring others down. Instagram:icollector23, Flickr:https://www.flickr.com/photos/144335251@N08/albums |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#461 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,296
|
![]()
Rising tides lift all boats it's just starting PCP! Enjoy the ride! Alot of anxiety with collectors scrambling to secure a nice copy of the 101 they have been picked through.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#462 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 7,630
|
![]()
The record $12.6 million sale of Mantle 1952 Topps SGC 9.5 did not do anything to the lower grade copies. They have dropped in value since then. I can see the Star 101 PSA 9 copies retaining their value since there are only three of them. I am not optimistic on BGS 8.5 (pop 260), BGS 9 (pop 73), PSA 7 (pop 69) and lower grade copies.
__________________
Jealousy is a form of hatred built on Insecurity. It's the unhappy and insecure people who show hatred, jealousy and try to bring others down. Instagram:icollector23, Flickr:https://www.flickr.com/photos/144335251@N08/albums Last edited by pcptrade; 05-21-2024 at 05:54 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#463 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,296
|
![]()
It's early in the game! The script has recently flipped where the Star 101 is his only rookie. It will continue to increase steadily over the years.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#464 | |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 6,492
|
![]() Quote:
the 101 has gotten plenty of attention at least ever since Beckett began pricing basketball, does your "script" leave this fact out? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#465 |
Member
|
![]()
Has PSA officially said that they won't ever grade the 1985-86 Star base set? Would really enjoy seeing the Jordan #117 in a PSA slab.
__________________
Collecting Julius Peppers. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#466 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 1,894
|
![]() Quote:
But dont say that too loud as PCP will call you a pumper I will say for certain that if PSA never graded the 101 these prices would never have seen the light of day. People don't realize how much legitimacy it added to the card. Nat Turner stepped forward and admitted Star XRC 101 is MJs true rookie, something I changed my mind about 10 years ago after educating myself and not Becketts sentimental bias baloney regarding the Fleer and what "should define" a rookie card I find it laughable people think Star 101 is a high pop card in lower grades yet remain silent on the ridiculous 86 Fleer population reports I'm gonna grab an 86 Fleer eventually but not at these prices with that pop. Imo the 86 Fleer all factors considered remains the "pumped" card. Yes not as much as 2021 prices but still pumped compared to 2019 prices. PSA 10 included. That's why the card keeps getting dumped Last edited by Starman101; 05-23-2024 at 10:20 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#467 | |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 6,492
|
![]() Quote:
is it some kind of pump that explains the 52 Mantle hobby supremacy even though the 51B is the RC? I can't imagine collectors spurning the 101 if it had a photo as good as on the 57 someone suggested the company brand, but that doesn't explain jack. Many of the Star cards are desirable on their merits and I've never heard of people collecting for brand per se (unless the brand per se signified greater production values, which it only partly does in this instance since Star had a small budget but still produced some nice product which in Star's case comes down essentially to selection of image to put on the card, it's pathetic that the image they have for the 101 is the best they could do) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#468 | |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 6,492
|
![]() Quote:
Unless you're an idiot, you know that a 950K sale on a PSA 9 101 is due to the rarity. Given the condition sensitivity of the 101, a 9 is probably like a 10 for many other cards. PSA grades tougher, etc. But presumably you're not an idiot, so what does explain your pump above which - to be the pump that it is - disregards all kinds of context? It's not like the context hasn't been brought up to you countless times |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#469 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,296
|
![]()
Stop with these stupid if they could have done a better job on the photo of the 101! That what makes it so special! No one knew what MJ would do! That in itself makes the photo that much more legit! Fleer had the luxury of having a 3 year sample on their photo choice!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#470 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 6,492
|
![]()
101 for/against:
For - no skimping on the colors/ink, so you get the nice deep red hue on the Bulls cards e.g. Rarity Against - awful (not merely mediocre) photo when one focuses in on MJ's face I don't even have an issue with the selection of MJ in some more ordinary basketball motion; it's the blotches and blurs on his face that ruin it 57 for/against: For - memorable photo, one of the most iconic in the hobby Against - skimping on the ink, in some cases photo slightly out of register and often coupled with ink more orange than red Not all that rare with reportedly well over 100K made I wouldn't credit either company for better design; I don't think design has anything to do with this comparison I don't think collectors even care all that much about the border sizes/centering on the Star card, the it isn't like you have photos offset against a white border to accentuate off-centeredness to the eyes. If anything, Fleer should be knocked for making so many off-centered 57s (but somehow having all cards reasonably well-centered back in those days was too much to ask). |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#471 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,296
|
![]()
The 57 is a great 3rd year card nothing wrong with that! 57 fan boys flip over the card tell me what you see on the back! When you have to explain to someone out of the hobby how it's his rookie with 2 years of stats on the back! Lmfao
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#472 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 2,733
|
![]()
The photo is arguably the most important part of trading cards. If the photos were reversed the Star card would be WAY more desirable and valuable.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#473 | |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 6,492
|
![]() Quote:
the 101 is the true Mantle 52 Topps of basketball! haha! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#474 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,296
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#475 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 2,733
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|