Quote:
Originally Posted by pgisback
It's mind boggling you guys can't grasp the difference between making a team that can compete with the best versus joining the best and making them better. Mind boggling for sure.
|
The best team last year were the Cavs. They won the championship. I dont understand why the argument changes every time on who is the best. If someone says GS was the best team because they won 73 games some homer comes along and argues 'yea well they it means nothing if they dont win the championship". But then when Cavs win the championship they are the best team all of a sudden.
Which is it? Who was the best team last year? The team that won the championship or not? Dont keep changing the criteria for the best team to form fit Lebron. Just quit it.
THe best team last year were the Cavs. So if Durant joined the Cavs, it would have been like Lebron joining the Celtics. In both cases the team that won the championship the previous year (this is how you calculated the best team right?> right? right?)
But since Durant didnt join the champions, he joined a team that would compete against the champions?? Just like Lebron didnt join the champions, he joined a team that would compete against the champions. Thats the premise here. You seem to keep chaning foots for both players to give the advantage to Lebron all the time.