Quote:
Originally Posted by pewe
What are the "both ways"? There looks like only one RC definition, yet again.
All you've said is: everyone agreed on what the hobby believes is a RC. And MLB/MLBA didn't always like when Topps issued a RC before they were ready for the player to have one.
So they made an agreement, that
a) memorialized what the hobby considers a RC
b) said "Topps you can't issue something that the hobby will consider a RC without our approval."
|
I've posted the agreement before so I know you have access to it. So why do you keep saying this? The agreement specifically says a player is a "prospect" and can't be in a major league set if they aren't on the 40 man roster. How exactly is that memorializing the "traditional" RC definition?
06-08-2022, 01:31 PM
Threaded Mode