Quote:
Originally Posted by Asian62150
Just having a scribbly version and a loopy Lulu version would give me pause. It's one thing to have someone's signature evolve over the years (i.e. MJ) or even flat out change (LeBron).
I think it's healthy to question things and have discussion on them. That's a big reason for these forums. I also appreciate LUCKY's analysis videos and the amount of digging he went through to find some of the Lulu variations (like the Petrovic and President signings).
As many have said at this point, speak with your wallet and buy what you think is best for you.
I have zero loopy Lulus and zero interest in ever having one long term.
|
I guess my problem with this thread was it was treated with the same kind of objective nature as the trimming threads, where the jury was there was clear cut proof Luka was not signing Lulu autos. That has obviously been proven to be subjective, and he clearly has the ability to sign in separate ways. I don’t think OP or initial doubters had ulterior motives, and were in their minds doing the right thing to question it. The silence has (for the most part) been deafening when more and more evidence has come out that Luka does sign this way as well. It seems pretty stubborn for the original doubters to not say “maybe I was wrong” at this point.