LeBron - Intentions of finishing career in Cleveland haven't changed

[johnyensmith123]

Originally Posted by HP7163

Lol you don't gotta throw the "google" reference bro. I believe u. I actually do know these players but didn't watch many Celtic games. IT is not better than Kyrie if "better" isn't in the context discussing the trade without the pick. ESPwhen no one has a clue what IT is till January. The cavs won the trade if they land Bagley, Porter etc. I also have a shortlist when saying "superstar" an neither kyrie or IT are IMO. Kyrie could potentially be one but IT is about to be 30 with a suspect hip.

And Lebron absolutely needs an AD coming into his prime type.. there are only so many players you can put with Lebron that are both attainable and good enough to beat the Warriors. Lebron has stated he wanted PG13, Melo.. he's not looking to get to the finals and lose to the Dubs so it's OBVIOUS what he wants and the solutions aren't abundant. So telling me he doesn't need "x" or "y" or ABCD is just kinda non sense when he absolutely does considering the options that are quality enough to beat Golden State. Dude isn't hanging around in Cleveland to win 55-60 games then lose to GS & hype his brand with stats or his hot takes. I say all of this nicely btw

IT is NOT better than Kyrie. Agree with you. The TRADE, not IT replacing Kyrie. Especially, considering the fact that Cavs don't know if LeBron's staying. So the TRADE potentially made them better, not IT > Kyrie.

You said the ONLY way LeBron's staying is if Cavs get "CP3 and PG13". And I just said that's not the ONLY way. So me telling you LeBron doesn't need "x" or "y" or ABCD is just kinda NOT non sense. I'm literally quoting what you said. You said CP3 and PG13 were the only way he's staying, which I said was not true.

And also Anthony Davis isn't the only way LeBron can win a championship. Again, you said LeBron "needs Anthony Davis". The reason I say that is because Anthony Davis to Cavs is a hypothetical and if you're going to make up trades, you might as well make up a trade of Westbrook or Butler or someone, although they're less likely to be traded. But who says NO is willing to trade away AD anyway? There were trade rumors, but that's just the media making up hypotheticals, without taking into account if NO is even considering trading away a talent like AD (not Cousins).