![]() |
|
|||||||
| FOOTBALL Post your Football Cards Hobby Talk |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Texan in AZ
Posts: 44,115
|
When Alabama and Clemson destroyed Oklahoma and Notre Dame, the popular opinion was that this represented an argument against expanding the college football playoffs
Yet since 2002, only 6 of the 136 NFL Wild Card teams have made it to the Super Bowl. NFL has 32 teams and almost no one bats an eye when they allow nearly half their teams to compete in the postseason despite the serious lack of Wild Card successes. The NCAA has almost 130 teams and yet many are adamantly against the idea of having more than 4 teams compete in the postseason. Is there a compelling argument that harmonizes these seemingly incongruent positions? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 7,040
|
No......
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 4,071
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
|
No, it is needed. Teams like the Chargers this year would have had three more wins then several playoff teams, and would be setting at home.
(Instead they acted like they were at home.)
__________________
Always looking for low numbered Tony Gonzalez cards. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Texan in AZ
Posts: 44,115
|
*wonders if people are reading the post or just the title*
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
|
Nope!
__________________
Looking for Celtic on card autos and Paul Pierce cards. IG-marylandcards42 |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 1,751
|
Nope I think it is fine the way it is and the rarity of a wild card team making a run is what makes it so special when it happens.
I am definitely against playoff expansion though which I know has been talked about here and there.
__________________
http://s577.photobucket.com/user/Cyphon25/library/?sort=3&page=0 |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 5,995
|
since when is 12 nearly half of 32?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Texan in AZ
Posts: 44,115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
BODA
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 9,400
|
6 of 136 teams is a misleading statistic, no? Even so, that seems good to me.
ETA: You can never have more than 2 wild card teams in the SB. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Meandering the matrix code that the hobby/forum overlords spit out
Posts: 17,791
|
Eli Manning votes no
__________________
@shortslabs I'VE WITNESSED HOW THE SAUSAGE IS MADE HERE...IT'S ROTTEN
https://www.youtube.com/c/TylerShort |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
Likewise, I don't care how CFL, Arena, Division II, or any other league does their postseason.
__________________
Always looking for low numbered Tony Gonzalez cards. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 5,995
|
Quote:
in the NFL it's an even distribution based on your ability to evaluate talent..... that would stand to reason the level of play should be similar across the board also...... in the NFL your top 2 seeds have bye rounds..... i bet you would see more lower seeds go further if you had 16 teams and nobody had a bye also... in college those games are neutral field.... play the NFL games with 16 teams on a neutral field too....... the outcomes would be a lot different i think everything is set up against the wild card..... so when you take "lesser" teams in terms of regular season performance; then tell them to go on the road 3 times against "better" teams... is it really a surprise they don't make the super bowl very often? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
Another way to look at it is that 1/3 of the time, a wild card team makes the Super Bowl. Why would you get rid of that? EDIT: And now that I think about it, it's not possible. There haven't been 136 wild card teams in 17 years. There were already 4 divisions per conference by 2002, so that's 68 in 17 years.
__________________
Always looking for more George Brett stuff. Need more rookies, low numbered inserts/parallels and on-card autos (no Panini). Last edited by no10pin; 01-13-2019 at 08:47 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 10,132
|
No.
On any Sunday (or multiple Sundays). |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
BODA
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: From a table in McDonalds, with lovely fake flowers on it.
Posts: 18,112
|
Yo. ..........
__________________
He has no rival, He has no equal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Texan in AZ
Posts: 44,115
|
Quote:
8 x 17 = 136. Only 6 of the 136 teams that have participated in the Wild Card round since 2002 have made it to the Super Bowl. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Texan in AZ
Posts: 44,115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Texan in AZ
Posts: 44,115
|
Quote:
And to tie it back to the original question, if fans of football are ok with having playoffs broad enough to include essentially fodder teams, then why do so many have a problem with the idea of expanding the college playoffs. This thread isn't to argue for or against anything, only to try to parse out the reasoning behind supporting statistically irrelevant playoff rounds in the NFL and opposing similar inclusions on the college level. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Banned
|
Too much money involved they'll never downsize. If anything they'll add more teams. I personally like the current format with wildcard weekend.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
BODA
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 9,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Member
|
Eliminating the wild card teams or the wild card round would be two different things.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|