Exquisite RPA vs other Exquisite rookie cards

[Totalpackage]

if LeBron's best rookie cards are the 2003 Exquisite rookie patch auto numbered to 99, what about the Emblems of Endorsements, Limited Logos or Scripted Swatches? Do people respect those cards as much as the rookie patch auto/99?

[Deadshot]

Some people like the Limited Logos better because of the bigger patch AND they're game worn.

[Totalpackage]

Originally Posted by Deadshot

Some people like the Limited Logos better because of the bigger patch AND they're game worn.

For example, if his RPA sold for $100, what about the Limited Logos? Do they carry the same value?

[Deadshot]

Originally Posted by Totalpackage

For example, if his RPA sold for $100, what about the Limited Logos? Do they carry the same value?

I think it depends a lot on condition, quality of patch, etc. These are the kind of cards people might target for fractional ownership, too, so that's going to change pricing some. You'll have to poke around a little bit on Heritage and Goldin to see what's ended recently.

[verona]

Rookies are always higher valued than others inserts rookie year. And in my opinion 2003 Exquisite is great design and the best RPA of every year. Maybe the EoE limited to only /15 and great design and patch can reach the RPA level.

Inviato dal mio Redmi Note 7 utilizzando Tapatalk

[Totalpackage]

Originally Posted by verona

Rookies are always higher valued than others inserts rookie year. And in my opinion 2003 Exquisite is great design and the best RPA of every year. Maybe the EoE limited to only /15 and great design and patch can reach the RPA level.

Inviato dal mio Redmi Note 7 utilizzando Tapatalk

I think rules are same for the following years' Exquisite sets. EoE is the rarest of them all, but the limited logos are the best looking ones in my opinion even though they don't valued as much as rookies and EoE.

[verona]

Originally Posted by Totalpackage

I think rules are same for the following years' Exquisite sets. EoE is the rarest of them all, but the limited logos are the best looking ones in my opinion even though they don't valued as much as rookies and EoE.

Well LL is great design of course and jumbo Patch, but sincerely as design only 2003 is my favorite and usually I prefer EoE or Number Pieces.

Inviato dal mio Redmi Note 7 utilizzando Tapatalk

[gomiamigo]

I mean for a great BGS 9 LL of Durant goes for like $18-20k before his return from injury, so people do recognize the value.

[bmf]

Originally Posted by Totalpackage

if LeBron's best rookie cards are the 2003 Exquisite rookie patch auto numbered to 99, what about the Emblems of Endorsements, Limited Logos or Scripted Swatches? Do people respect those cards as much as the rookie patch auto/99?

people will always highly prefer the /99 rpa. and pay even more (much more) for the far more limited gold variant.

[forgiven1]

His Limited Logos are actually game used. 👍👍👍

[yaoming]

I love limited logos, best auto patch set ever made
My fav of all
RPA will still be higher value though


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Archangel1775]

The base set numbered RPA will trump any other insert set RPA with the exception of a 1/1 Logoman Auto of said insert RPA(s). The bas e set numbered Logoman 1/1 RPA trumps all.

[Totalpackage]

Thank you, guys. The replies are so helpful. BTW, if the original Exquisite RPA worth $100, what will the other insert rookies under same condition in the set worth? Is there any scale that I can use as a reference?