Quote:
Originally Posted by hermanotarjeta
Here is a list of the top college programs with the most alumni who have won NBA championships through the 2024 season. No Dookie won a ring in 2025:
1 UCLA 23
2 UNC 19
3 Kentucky 18
4 Kansas 16
5 Arizona 11
5 Ohio State 11
5 Oregon State 11
8 Florida 10
8 Louisville 10
8 Texas 10
8 Villanova 10
12 Indiana 9
12 Minnesota 9
14 Michigan 8
14 Michigan State 8
16 Cincinnati 7
16 Duke 7
16 Houston 7
16 Iowa 7
16 Marquette 7
We know Duke has great athletes with impeccable individual talent and toolboxes, they have arguably had the best recruiting classes since the 1980's, yet have only 7 rings to show for it in their school history.
What's wrong with these Dookies?
You figure it out.
I would have expected Duke players to have 20+ rings if they were so great. Fanz must have the Bron homer disease logic ..... so you can jump higher, run faster and shoot better than everyone else. Yet you can't win a ring. Hmmm, something is wrong there.....
|
Duke will gradually climb the list of NBA rings over the next 10 years, especially since close to none of the traditional college blueblood basketball powers - including UCLA, UNC, Kansas, Kentucky - are currently producing elite NBA players at Duke's level. UCLA has been done as a basketball power for close to a decade, and Kentucky is now done now that John Calipari is long gone and that he's also currently irrelevant as a one-and-done future NBA player recruiter.
So your one-dimensional and outdated analysis for evaluating Duke's CURRENT prowess as an NBA talent producer is weak at best.
And it figures that you would also be a LeBron James hater troll. You're a joke.