Quote:
Originally Posted by MavsRChamps
Haven’t really heard a good answer to this question.
Why doesn’t psa pay their employees better? Would obv lead to more competent graders, less turnover etc etc
Maybe my math isn’t adding. But their profit must be huuuuuggge. Charging $20+ to put a piece of cardboard in plastic casing.
Psa myst solve their training dilemma of having inconsistent graders too. Don’t understand how this is still an issue.
If they kept their employees they wouldn’t have to keep on hiring and hiring and hiring as they seem to be doing. The fact a company as large as Psa can’t forsee staffing issues is ridiculous and just blatant lies. They can, but they just want to use the “we’re short staffed” as an excuse to not grow, not improve their training, and to raise their profit per employee but not maximize their profit overall (meaning if they expand and meet grading demand they’d profit way more)
|
I guarantee Nat and his team have all the staffing, ROI, raw materials cost down to the profit per minute. You don't want to pay graders a ton to grade the 60% TCG and however much ultra modern stuff. PSA is not in the accuracy business, it is to get as much product out the door with good margins as possible.