View Single Post
Old 07-15-2025, 06:25 PM   #158
88horsepower
Member
 
88horsepower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Somewhere In Time
Posts: 23,607
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mc1 View Post
I’ve been using COMC to submit to PSA. Got back another sub… Im not sure Im going to be grading anything anymore. People had been complaining about PSA being stricter for a couple years now but I was still doing well until the last few months. I’ve said that before. They are grading tougher or damaging cards somewhere along the whole process. If this is the new “normal”, I wont be wasting my time or money.
The damaging cards thing is a real concern. It wouldn't shock me if, in the process of trying to move cards in bulk through the assembly line, some cards inevitably get damaged due to lack of carefulness. I've had cards come back that were absolutely not in the condition I sent them in. Some cards have come back with corner dings that, if I saw those during my initial assessment, would never have been sent to begin with. But other than taking my own high-resolution scans prior to sending them, there's no recourse. And since I'm a collector and not a flipper, the cards I'm sending aren't worth the money to complain about, but the hours of work it took to find the right looking copy of a given card is what hurts more than the potential financial loss.
__________________
https://www.psacard.com/psasetregistry/showcase/rookies/88horsepower-childhood-baseball-rookies-collection/imagegallery/15549
88horsepower is offline   Reply With Quote