Quote:
Originally Posted by rats60
Same old pathetic response from you, insulting people because they disagree with you. There is no screwing anyone. Two chances at the HOF Veterans Committee. If you can't get more than 25% once, you are off the ballot. Do you not like playing by the rules?
|
Wow, typical pathetic response from you. I didn't insult anyone. I guess reading isn't your strong suit either. Saying it's a shame you can't see something isn't an insult.
Maybe you aren't aware just how many worthy hall of famers took more time than that to get elected. Ironically, my response was directly regarding your claim of a list of players you would like to get consideration. A list of players who this rule will forever prevent from getting enshrined.
And you also can't comprehend how changing the rules to keep out someone you don't like isn't "playing by the rules." It's literally the opposite of it. What a joke.
Allowing your personal bias against Bonds to screw over a bunch of worthy players who might take a few ballots to get the appreciation they deserve is the most pathetic thing of all. You are a sad old man who is controlled by your hatred for Bonds leaving Pittsburgh. It shows in every post you make.
THERE'S your insult.
