Quote:
Originally Posted by grade
CSG also did change the grading standards and it has been proven, Go look at multiple sub groups on Facebook. I even posted results i found here.
Just because you dont agree with someone, does not mean it is not true.
I subbed with csg/cgc and just post my reviews and opinions of those subs. What pertains to me last year and to the recent new users this year may differ. But for the time i subbed last year, it is exactly as i post.
|
You're stating this as fact which it is not. You can speculate that CSG got more lenient on grading based on a small amount of subs that people shared publicly.
Personally I haven't seen any changes. I've received 2 bulks back since the label change that had resubs in them - I had some 9s jump up to 9.5s and that makes sense because a 9.5, by definition, is "a card that displays premium eye appeal for a Mint card". Since the 9.5 didn't exist when I first graded, it makes sense that my better 9s (9s with solid subgrades) got a 9.5.
I had a few 9s jump to a 10. I also had a few 9s go down to an 8.5. I had plenty of 9s that stayed the same.
I also had a new bulk come back to me today with only two 10s and a handful of 9.5s.
All of this suggests no change in grading standards and instead we're just seeing the addition of a 9.5 grade along with standard human grader variance.