Quote:
Originally Posted by k13
Trout is not worth talking about.
At Bats Per Home Run
1. Barry Bonds (36) 6.52 2001 L
2. Mark McGwire (34) 7.27 1998 R
3. Mark McGwire (35) 8.02 1999 R
4. Mark McGwire (32) 8.13 1996 R
5. Barry Bonds (39) 8.29 2004 L
6. Babe Ruth+ (25) 8.48 1920 L
7. Barry Bonds (38) 8.67 2003 L
8. Barry Bonds (37) 8.76 2002 L
9. Babe Ruth+ (32) 9.00 1927 L
10. Sammy Sosa (32) 9.02 2001 R
11. Babe Ruth+ (26) 9.15 1921 L
12. Jim Thome+ (31) 9.23 2002 L
13. Mark McGwire (33) 9.31 1997 R
14. Mickey Mantle+ (29) 9.52 1961 B
15. Hank Greenberg+ (27) 9.59 1938 R
16. Roger Maris (26) 9.67 1961 L
17. Luke Voit (29) 9.68 2020 R
18. Sammy Sosa (29) 9.74 1998 R
19. Barry Bonds (35) 9.80 2000 L
20. Sammy Sosa (30) 9.92 1999 R
21. Babe Ruth+ (33) 9.93 1928 L
22. Ryan Howard (26) 10.02 2006 L
23. Jimmie Foxx+ (24) 10.09 1932 R
24. Giancarlo Stanton (27) 10.12 2017 R
25. Ralph Kiner+ (26) 10.17 1949 R
26. Mickey Mantle+ (24) 10.25 1956 B
27. Jeff Bagwell+ (26) 10.26 1994 R
28. Kevin Mitchell (32) 10.33 1994 R
David Ortiz (30) 10.33 2006 L
30. Matt Williams (28) 10.35 1994 R
31. Aaron Judge (25) 10.42 2017 R
32. Mike Trout (27) 10.44 2019 R
|
You use a list that includes Sammy Sosa as evidence and you expect to be taken seriously? Yes, Bonds' steroid years were statistically impressive, and outmatched by anyone (juiced or not), that was his reason for juicing, my point was that Trout's numbers would possibly match Bonds' if he were also on the juice. You seem to be missing the point.