Quote:
Originally Posted by salthill
True. I’d be much more concerned with what their training data is.
If they’ve just used a bunch of images of PSA and BGS graded cards, then congrats, they’ve just built a system that - at its best - can only equal the performance of PSA/BGS.
|
I think that’s their goal, to use the PSA or BGS standard but to just be consistent with it and take market share that way. That’s a big complaint a lot of people have with BGS and PSA is that there isn’t consistency with what’s mint vs gem mint, etc. Being a “tough grade” doesn’t mean anything. A lot of people consider SGC the toughest grade, what has that done for resale value? Resale value is the point at the end of the day. Like 90% of people grade with the primary goal being to increase value of cards, not PC slabs. I personally think they probably should have done 3 different 10 grades (gem mint, pristine, flawless) instead of the BGS route 9.5 gem mint with 2 10’s and think it will be a huge mistake at the end of the day. As of now they’re doing great, though, and I’m looking forward to getting my cards back from them.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk