View Single Post
Old 09-02-2020, 01:19 PM   #23
glen87
Member
 
glen87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: VERMONT
Posts: 73,913
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hypostatic View Post
I purchased a $500+ raw rookie card recently and just received the package. I don't want to get into the details of the player or card in case the seller is a member here.

The seller had listed two photos of the front of the card in a sleeve and another two of the back of the card in a sleeve. There were no apparent surface issues on the card and I assumed any visible dots and lines were lint and smudges. Fortunately, after gently wiping the card down, all of the dots and lines disappeared and the card looks pristine other than a single "pit" near the center front of the card that wasn't in the pictures and wasn't disclosed.

Based on my inspection, but for that pit, this card might have graded a PSA 9 or 10, but now I'm not sure if it would even get an 8.

Is this something the seller should have disclosed? If so, is this a legitimate reason to return the card? I don't have buyer's remorse. I love the card and I'm happy to keep it for my PC, but I can't help but feel that the issue should have been identified in the description given how prominent it is.
if you really want help, give us ALL the info so we can see what you were seeing when you bought the card. otherwise we are just making speculations.
__________________
collecting James Madison University players of all sports
JMU cards: https://www.flickr.com/photos/jmucards/

other cards: https://www.flickr.com/photos/glen87/albums
glen87 is offline   Reply With Quote