Quote:
Originally Posted by Hess687
In my opinion, essentially if the 1% would share their wealth with the people below them, you would start to see a trickle down effect of people passing it on, leaving no one left to be hungry or just trying to get by.
Unfortunately, greed and selfishness come into play where when you're at the top you could not care less about the people below you which leads to famine and death.
It pretty much reminds me of the graphic I once saw of some birds sitting on different levels of a telephone pole. At the top of the pole is the owner, right below him is the CEO's and below them is the middle managers and then below them is the regular employees.
The top bird sh*ts on everyone below them and then the next bird sh*ts on the people below them and so forth and so on. So when the top bird looks down all he sees are pieces of sh*t while the bottom people look up all they see are as$holes.
Hence when in the movie, the main character tells the people below them to only eat what is laid out for them or he will sh*t on their food, it starts to work, but when the lady tells him now we just need to get the people above us to do the same and he says in return, "That won't happen.....because I can't sh*t upwards."
|
I got all that . but I just don't need to see a movie with all that repetitiveness . te platform comes down they eat , repeat , etc.etc. then the end was lame . it's nothing I would watch again .