Quote:
Originally Posted by asujbl
Define match? I know you are just using those 3 as the barometer so I get your definition...
Would you rather have 24.5, 7.5, and 5.4 or 27.5, 13.6, and 3.7? Or 36.1, 6.6, and 7.5?
I understand what you are trying to say but you know it's cherry picking, which is fine as we all do it, because you can say "only LeBron and Giannis" were better.
I do think Blake is probably still a Top 15 player... but not because of just looking at stats.
|
well yea Hardens stat line is better but it did not qualify...i wasnt saying he is better than others that didnt get there...but simply showing that his stat line is rare and only 2 of the top 5 guys in the game also hit on those 3 numbers...
and to include him in the same list as guys like w.matthews/c.parsons and some of the others was just flat insulting lol
and ive learned from the many instances of Giannis fans using random stats/numbers/groupings to make him seem like a once in a lifetime thing that its acceptable...lol
but is it cherry picking? to a degree yea i guess...but it is simply his classic slash line of pts/reb/ast...