Can someone please explain why these two 1/1 are identical?
 

I own both copies and submitted the one that is in the PSA holder. I just don’t get it as they seem identical to me. Notably in border color as well. Thanks

[IMG]https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/pcqusmal08qdeebg5ti5n/2023-09-17-07.26.48.jpg?rlkey=axw0eruykq15dwtt63ae91nvh&dl=0[/IMG]

pictures not working for me

[QUOTE=MarsAttacks;19052261]I own both copies and submitted the one that is in the PSA holder. I just don’t get it as they seem identical to me. Notably in border color as well. Thanks


[IMG]https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Mk8zDeUrlvn1ijrekPKiP_cRMduL5W3t/view?usp=drivesdk[/IMG]

[IMG]https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FNxDYSKhbgpBVgL6f8AGgHF4tuWYZSvX/view?usp=drivesdk[/IMG][/QUOTE]

Can't see the pics. Don't have access to your Google Drive.

Sorry, having trouble with uploading pics. Should see thumbnails now.

Answer: Manufactured scarcity is fake scarcity.

Could be that a second card is produced in case of damage and instead of disposing, the card Backdoored its way into the market?

I had a rookie card of Heath Schuler that had 0001/???? That had to be caught in proofing but it reached the market. It was the only error card in a large print run that reached the market. People don’t want to dispose cards that are created because they are unique.

If you have both copies, it’s a good chance that one of them was suppose to be disposed of.

Considering Topps is up to 3 copies of 1/1 in Bowman this year I take all these 1/1 cards with a grain of salt